Answer:
A) an inflationary bias to monetary policy.
Explanation:
Inflationary bias refers to a situation where monetary policy results in a higher inflation rate.
If the executive branch of the government was responsible for setting monetary policy, then they could be tempted to act according to electoral pressures like lowering unemployment rates or increasing the nominal growth of the GDP. The problem with this happening is that nothing is for free and if the monetary base is artificially increased for short term benefits, in the long run the whole economy will suffer due to higher inflation rates.
Answer: -3,300Nm or -3,300 Joules
Explanation:
Work = F X d
Where:
F = force = 1,500 N
d = distance = 2.20m
We will be taking into consideration that the work that the tension force on the rope does to Magnus is negative because the force goes against Magnus.
This is in accordance with Newton' third law, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Therefore, we have:
W = F X d
W = 1,500 X 2.20
W = 3,300Nm
Since we are not calculating the work done by Magnus, but rather the opposite work done by the rope, our answer will be negative.
We therefore have:
-3,300Nm or -3,300 Joules.
b. $50
c. $500
d. $400
With _______ insurance, the insured agrees to pay a specific premium each year until death.
a. whole-life
b. endowment life
c. limited-payment
d. half life
Answer:
1
Explanation:
a market is a place is the point of interaction between buyers and sellers
Answer: compromise
Explanation:
Compromise refers to a scenario whereby a deal is made between different parties and in such scenario, each party gives up part of their demand. It simply means finding agreement through communication.
Since despite the need of the marketing team and the research team, both teams decided to split the company's funds so that both teams could use them, but not optimally. This is referred to as compromise.
Answer:
Compromise
Explanation:
When agreement is made or a conclusion is reached between tow different parties or wings, such that each of the agreeing parties has to shelve a certain part of its plans or demand in other to reach a reasonable conclusion. This idea shelving or cutting down on intention or projects by each party is called compromise. In the scenario, both the marking and research and development teams needed funds, however, due to inadequate provision, they had to agree on rationing what is available even though an optimal usage would be very unlikely.
Answer:
No financial statement revision.
Explanation:
Financial statements are a snap shot of the performance of a business within a given period. The period is always defined and can be a month, a quarter, biannual, or a year.
In this instance the financial statements for the previous year has already been prepared, and Advertiser Co.’s directors voted immediately after year end to double the advertising budget for the coming year and authorized a change in advertising agencies.
There will be no revision of financial statement as this activity happened after the year the financial statement is reporting for.
2) Willis materially breached the contract.
3) Willis substantially breached the contract.
4) Willis breached the contract, but the breach was not material.
5) Willis committed an anticipatory breach of the contract.
Answer:
4) Willis breached the contract, but the breach was not material.
Explanation:
Willis made a mistake when he was installing the floor and faucets in the powder room. But the mistake was not substantial, if you consider that the contract for building the house was worth $300,000 and it costs only $3000 to fix the mistake (that is only a 0.1%).
Under the substantial performance doctrine, we can consider that Willis performed his part of the contract and Robert must pay him for building the house. Substantial performance refers to a situation where a contact is not 100% complete, but almost 100% complete. In this case the contract is 99.9% complete, so Robert cannot use the powder room as an excuse to not pay Willis for his work.