D) Jenny and Sam's wedding was joyful is the correct way to use apostrophes to show joint ownership. Using it this way makes the readers understand that "their" wedding was joyful. The other options use grammar incorrectly and make the sentence less clear to the reader. The apostrophe must be placed before the S on the last persons name to correctly show joint ownership in this sentence.
rebirth
tragedy
quest
Answer: your answer is D: quest
Explanation:
B.share memories with the audience.
C.inspire the audience to take action.
D.give hope to the audience....
WOULD LIKE HELP THANKS
The correct answer and the reason the author repeats the phrase "turn off your television" is C. inspire the audience to take action.
That sentence is extracted the "I Have a Dream" speech delivered by Martin Luther King Jr. in August 28, 1963. Contextualized in that speech, Martin Luther King Jr is asking the audience to turn off the television and talk to their families and learn what they have to say, to talk to their communities and connect with the world around them, inspiring them to take action.
C.
the author here is is inspire the audience to take some positive action he is repeating this phrase .
B. "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States."
C. "Only a few of the 18,000 students in the school system wore the black armbands. Only five students were suspended for wearing them. There is no indication that the work of the schools or any class was disrupted."
D. "In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate."
The correct answer is B. The excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines that shows how precedent helps support an argument is: "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States".
This excerpt shows how the Supreme Court uses decisions of other cases already resolved to support arguments within cases in decision at the moment.
In the present case, the Court uses the precedent West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the doctrine of "reasonableness" of McReynolds is not admitted, to apply it to the case Tinker v. Des Moines.