Which sentence correctly uses apostrophes to show joint ownership?A) Jennys and Sams’ wedding was joyful.
B) Jenny’s and Sam’s wedding was joyful.
C) Jenny’s and Sam wedding was joyful.
D) Jenny and Sam’s wedding was joyful.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: I am assured that option ‘’D. Jenny and Sam’s wedding was joyful.’’ of course is the right one, because according to the basic grammar rules, when we have an example where the main object ( the wedding) belongs to several pronouns (Jenny and Sam), we need to put possessive "s" ONLY after the last pronoun (in that case after the second).
Answer 2
Answer:

D) Jenny and Sam's wedding was joyful is the correct way to use apostrophes to show joint ownership. Using it this way makes the readers understand that "their" wedding was joyful. The other options use grammar incorrectly and make the sentence less clear to the reader. The apostrophe must be placed before the S on the last persons name to correctly show joint ownership in this sentence.


Related Questions

Sssssh, listen! said terry."i can hear her coming down the hallway." what word gives the reader a clue that what is happening is going to be funny.
Where did St. Hilda die?
Which of these represents the final step in the writing process?
Please Help!!!!! Identify the correctly punctuated sentence in each group. A: The detective said Time is of the essence. B: The detective said, "Time is of the essence". C: The detective said "Time is of the essence". D: The detective said "Time is of the essence." Why must a research paper always include a Works Cited page? A: to convince readers that common knowledge is valid B: to give proper credit to original source material C: to explain in detail why quotations are used in the paper D: to list all authors' names correcty
Roosevelt says this inaugural address is "preeminently the time" to speak the truth to the American people. Why would this instance be different than any other time?

A theme is the______conveyed in the text

Answers

The theme is the message. I always used to think the theme and then you make the me and then you make the message. 

What happens when the group reaches the Oklahoma bar

Answers

The answer is they find the establishment dramatically changed.

Hope this helps.

Which sentence best explains the statement "Writing is rewriting

Answers

Writing is rewriting is best explained by saying that every time you write something, you at first prepare drafts. These drafts then get rewritten so as to improve them, which in turn means that your writing is actually rewriting.

The book The Lord of the Rings by J. R. R. Tolkien, in which the main character must go on a journey to destroy a magic ring, is an example of which plot archetype?comedy
rebirth
tragedy
quest

Answers

This is a perfect example of an archetypal quest. The main character is a hero has an important mission that brings him into a different world. In a quest, the hero is an ordinary fellow that the reader can relate to, but who has hidden strengths that make him ideally suited. It is usually stated or implied that he is fated to complete this quest. He fights against obstacles and there may be loss and tragedy along the way, but in the end, goodness and his cause always prevail.

Answer: your answer is D: quest

Explanation:

The author repeats the phrase "turn off your television” toA.offer criticism of the audience.
B.share memories with the audience.
C.inspire the audience to take action.
D.give hope to the audience....

WOULD LIKE HELP THANKS

Answers

The correct answer and the reason the author repeats the phrase "turn off your television" is C. inspire the audience to take action.

That sentence is extracted the "I Have a Dream" speech delivered by Martin Luther King Jr. in August 28, 1963.  Contextualized in that speech, Martin Luther King Jr is asking the audience to turn off the television and talk to their families and learn what they have to say, to talk to their communities and connect with the world around them, inspiring them to take action.

Answer

C.

Explanation

the author here is is inspire the audience to take some positive action he is repeating this phrase .


Which excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines shows how precedent helps support an argument?A. "I, for one, am not fully persuaded that school pupils are wise enough, even with this Court's expert help from Washington, to run the 23,390 public school systems [n4] in our 50 States."
B. "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States."
C. "Only a few of the 18,000 students in the school system wore the black armbands. Only five students were suspended for wearing them. There is no indication that the work of the schools or any class was disrupted."
D. "In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate."

Answers


In my opinion, the most reasonable way of supporting an argument reveals in the second statement B. "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States." This one makes the speaker’s position apprehensible for us.

The correct answer is B. The excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines that shows how precedent helps support an argument is: "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States".

This excerpt shows how the Supreme Court uses decisions of other cases already resolved to support arguments within cases in decision at the moment.

In the present case, the Court uses the precedent West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the doctrine of "reasonableness" of McReynolds is not admitted, to apply it to the case Tinker v. Des Moines.