If an idea is restated in a nonfiction article, what does this most likely signal for the reader?What the author expects the reader to misunderstand
The least important but most complex detail
An error the author needs to correct for clarity
Something the reader should think, feel, or do

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

I believe that the answer is "something that the reader should think, feel, or do". I believe this because it makes the most sense for one and two when an author is restating an idea it means it is important and they want the reader to feel that it is important too. The author also might want the reader to have emotions toward the idea depending on what it is. I hope I am not too late to answering this question.

Answer 2
Answer:

If an idea is restated in a nonfiction article the most likely signal is something the reader should think, feel, or do

What is nonfiction article?

Nonfiction writing are literature or writing that are true.

They can written from a true story or an individual biography.

Therefore, If an idea is restated in a nonfiction article the most likely signal is something the reader should think, feel, or do

Learn more on nonfiction below

brainly.com/question/1152788

#SPJ2


Related Questions

All of the following are true statements about Abraham Lincoln early life EXCEPT which of the following?a. His mother died when he was only nine years old.b. He married Mary Todd.c. He had very little formal education.d. He attended Harvard College.
Construct a timeline of events in Europe between 1871 and 1917 that affected the balance of power
What region of the United States is the Dust Bowl associated with?
In the late 18th century, the king of England sent representatives to China in hopes of opening it to increased trade. Which of the following best describes the Qing emperor Qianlong's response to the king's request?
Which statement best describes the American economy in the 1920s?a. Wages decreased and the economy appeared weak. b. Unemployment was at an all-time high. c. Stock prices rose and the economy appeared healthy. d. Small businesses dominated American industry. Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D

in the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decidedA. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states. B. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. C. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. D. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south

Answers

Answer:

A. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott decision was a legal case in which the U.S. Preeminent Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7– 2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had lived in a free state and region (where subjection was precluded) was not in this way qualified for his opportunity; that African Americans were not and would never be natives of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820), which had pronounced free all domains west of Missouri and north of scope 36°30′, was illegal. The choice added fuel to the sectional controversy and pushed the country closer to civil war.

A. the Compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.

Under the Compromise of 1850, western states were allowed to vote whether or not territories would allow slavery. The compromise also created a dividing line for existing states between free and slave states.

The Dred Scott case was decided in 1857 after Scott's master had moved him into free states. He argued that by being moved into free states, declared after the Compromise of 1850, changed his status. The Court declared slaves were not people but were property. Due to their status as property, the property could not be taken away just because the master moved.

How did mutinies affect the French and Russian army?

Answers

Mutinies in both the French and Russian armies (and navies) set each nation back significantly because it diminished their fighting force and decreased soldier moral.
I'm assuming you're referring to mutinies by soldiers that occurred during The Great War, which later became known as World War I.  

Men of the French army essentially decided to stop obeying orders and would not participate in any more futile attacks on the enemy.
An especially costly assault was launched by General Robert Nivelle, Commander of the French Army, in April 1917.  120,000 French soldiers lay dead after ten days and no ground had been gained.  After that, various regiments of the French army began to refuse to obey orders for further attacks.  About half of the French army ultimately participated in the mutiny.

In Russia, soldiers mutinied by participating in the Russian Revolution that toppled Tsar Nicholas II from power. 
In February, 1917, the Cossack cavalry refused to shoot (as ordered) on protesting workers in Petrograd.  The tsar's military governor in Petrograd issued orders to other military regiments to shoot any protesters who would not disperse, but many of the other soldiers refused such orders also, and mutiny spread.  By March 2, 1917, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate his position as ruler of Russia.

What is the melting pot theory

Answers

Correct answer:

it's a metaphor

The term melting pot is a metaphor to describe a heterogeneous society that is becoming more homogeneous, as they merge into a single common culture. The metaphor of fusion was used in the 1780s.

The melting pot theory, also known as cultural assimilation, refers to the idea that people from different cultures and backgrounds come together and meld into a single, unified society, adopting the dominant culture of that society.

This concept suggests that immigrants and their descendants should shed their original cultural practices and identities in favor of embracing the values, customs, and language of their host country.

The melting pot theory implies that cultural diversity is less important than creating a homogeneous society. While the term originated in reference to the United States, it has been applied to other countries as well. However, critics argue that the melting pot theory may overlook the value of preserving cultural traditions and promoting multiculturalism.

To know more about cultural practices visit:

brainly.com/question/28321937

#SPJ6

What was one way the passage of the Factory Acts (1844–1847) affected labor?

Answers

The primary way in which the passage of the Factory Acts (1844–1847) affected labor was that it restricted the working hours in factories to 10 hours a day, which cut back on worker injury and fatigue.

Answer:

Labor’s work hours were limited.

Which is true of commercial producers in developed countries?

Answers

Which is true of commercial producers in developed countries?

A. They suffer from greatly decreased yields.

B. They must plant fallow crops per government regulations.

C. They rarely receive government subsidies.

D. They control prices by adjusting their output.

E. They face stagnant demand in domestic markets.

Answer:

D. They control prices by adjusting their output

Explanation:

Considering the question is relating to commerical producers of agricultural products.

Commercial Agricultural producers in developed countries tend to control prices by adjusting their output. This is due to following reasons:

1. Instability of prices

2. Instability of income

3. Government intervention: such as levies and tarrifs

4. Cost of production.

Hence, the correct answer is that, they control prices by adjusting their output in order to combat the aforementioned issues.

Which war was described as a "splendid little war" by Secretary of State John Hay?

Answers

The Spanish american war.