Political instability in the emerging Latin American countries was due in part to

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Conflicting perspectives on government is the main reason of the political disorder in the issuing Latin American countries. There are many other reasons as well as inequality, weak political institution.

What factors contributed to Latin America's insecurity after independence?

The constitution of the Latin America has vouched equality before law, but the application of this law has not seen in any part of the America.

Religious views are considered higher values, Catholic Church, landowner and political leaders has dominated the country and Mexicans politics.

Thus, Conflicting perspectives on government is the main reason.

For more details about Latin America's insecurity after independence, click here:

brainly.com/question/7539507

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer:

conflicting views on government.


Related Questions

A CEO is to a company as a general is to a/an:A. Solider B. Company C. Military D. Militant
Which of the grievances do you think are important to the colonist and why
Which describes German engineer Charles William Siemens's best-known innovation? a. a device to send wireless signals through the airb. a process for making steel in a gas furnacec. the first practical internal combustion engined. an instrument to detect icebergs using echoes
What was one reason that South Carolina decided to secede
The civil rights act of 1875 did for nearly 100 years before it was declared as unconstitutional

The founding of the nation of israel happened in?

Answers

Creation of Israel, 1948

Which is one way that economies in southern and eastern Africa are overcoming economic challenges?a. mortgage lending?
b. fishing?
c. ecotourism?
d. car manufacturing?

Answers

"c. ecotourism" is one way that economies in southern and eastern Africa are overcoming economic challenges, since more and more people want to experience the sights and activities in these regions for less money.

Will mark brainliest answer!! Please Help!!!!!!!!!!!What did Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson have in common?

Each acquired large territories of land for the U.S.
They both followed the same philosophy of government.
America built a strong navy when they were president.


How did Jackson respond to the close of the Bank of the United States?

He began to sell western land to foreign countries.
The Treasury began to print more money.
He established state banks.

Jackson was noted for his strong nationalistic foreign policy.

True
False

Answers

1.Each acquired large territories of land for the U.S.
2.He established state banks.
3. False

Answer:

1.Each acquired large territories of land for the U.S.

2.He established state banks.

3. False

Explanation:

During the American revolution,who were the loyalists and what were they fighting for ?

Answers

During the American Revolutionary War, loyalists were American colonists who remained devoted to the British Crown. The "Patriots," who supported the revolution, opposed them. They fought for a variety of reasons, including devotion to the British Crown.

The Loyalists, commonly referred to as Tories, were those who supported the British Crown and opposed the revolutionary movement for American independence during the American Revolution. They fought out of loyalty to the British Crown, the defense of pre-existing social and economic systems, attachments to their cultures and ethnic groups, and fear of reprisals.

The Loyalists were not a uniform group, and they had a variety of goals. While some Loyalists actively participated in the war alongside British soldiers, others supported them in non-combat capacities. Following the American Revolution, Loyalists encountered several difficulties, such as property expropriation and, in certain cases, forced emigration to areas governed by the British.

Learn more about loyalists, here:

brainly.com/question/11224663

#SPJ4

Answer:

Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War. They were opposed by the "Patriots", who supported the revolution.

They fought for the British not out of loyalty to the Crown, but from a desire for freedom, which the British promised them in return for their military service.

Brainliest PLSSS

How did the political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger? A. Voter Turnout was the same. B. Voter turnout was very high C. Voter turnout was lower. Or D. Voter turnout was 100%.

Answers

The correct answer is B. Voter turnout was higher when political parties were stronger. This is due, in part, to what are called "political machines" in some parts of the country where the Republican Party or Democratic Party was particularly strong and ensured that their members always showed up at the polls.

Answer:

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "B. Voter turnout was very high." The political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger by having a Voter turnout that was very high. It is considered an ideal election.

I hope I can help you have a beautiful weekend :)

Suppose you have read two different books on World War II, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Which of the following sources provides the best support for the authors' arguments?A. An article claiming that World War II was the most important war in history
B. A review of the two books written by a popular national newspaper columnist
C. A World War II history website made by high school students for a final project
D. A set of diary entries written by generals who planned strategies during World War II

Answers

Answer:

D. A set of diary entries written by generals who planned strategies during World War II

Explanation:

We take into account the prayers provided, we affirm that A set of diary entries written by generals who planned strategies during World War II, provides us with the best support for the authors' arguments, because it tells us in the first person their feelings and experiences about the War.

D. A set of diary entries written by generals who planned strategies during WW2