b. the United States should invade and capture all of Mexico.
c. slavery should extend westward beyond the South.
d. Native Americans had a right to the land they lost.
Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States should own most or all of North America.
Further Explanation:
manifest destiny:
The conviction or teaching, held predominantly in the center and last piece of the nineteenth century, that it was the fate of the U.S. to grow its domain over the entire of North America and to broaden and upgrade its political, social, and monetary impacts.
Thought of Manifest Destiny:
In straightforward terms, Manifest Destiny was the possibility that Americans were predetermined, by God, to administer the North American mainland. This thought, with all the going with changes of scene, culture, and religious conviction it inferred, had profound roots in American culture.
manifest destiny is significant:
manifest Destiny, an expression authored in 1845, communicated the way of thinking that drove nineteenth century U.S. regional extension. Show Destiny held that the United States was predetermined—by God, its backers accepted—to grow its territory and spread majority rule government and private enterprise over the whole North American mainland.
caused Manifest Destiny:
Show fate was brought about by the way that the American individuals were verifiably associated with English development. This gave them a feeling of predominance over different people groups who lived in North America. In view of the way that they were white and cultivated, the Americans felt better than the Indians.
Subject: history
Level: High School
Keywords: manifest destiny, Thought of Manifest Destiny, manifest destiny is significant, caused Manifest Destiny.
Related links:
Learn more about evolution on:
Legal Aid Society
Japanese American Citizens League
none of the above
B Trade with North America
C Diplomatic missions
D Waging war
c. diplomatic missions
Answer:
Ellise Island
Explanation:
B.They were small nations with small populations.
C.There was a lack of unity among members of various groups.
D.They were resigned to the fate of being ruled by foreigners.
E.They were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades.
I believe the answer is:
A.They did not have the most advanced military equipment.
C.There was a lack of unity among members of various groups.
E.They were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades
The difference in millitary equipment made the colonised country unable to defend themselves in the face of Europeans threat
. When this happen, some people decided to surrender to the European while some of them decided to fight, which divide the unity among them. Not only that, if the majority of people refuse to follow the colony, they would be given with restrictions and blockades which hurt their economy.
Non-European regions are the countries, which are not controlled by the European authorities. However, their weaknesses made the Europeans control and colonize them.
The correct answer is:
Option A. They did not have the most advanced military equipment.
Option C. There was a lack of unity among members of various groups.
Option E. They were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades.
The inefficient military and equipment made the colonized country unable to defend themselves in European threat.
Some of the non-European regions decided to fight, while some surrendered to the European authorities. This led to the division of unity amongst them.
Thus, the majority of the populace refuse to follow the colony, and they would be given restrictions and blockades which hurt their economy.
To know more about non-European regions, refer to the following link: