Blitz Industries has a debt-equity ratio of .6. Its WACC is 9.1 percent, and its cost of debt is 6.4 percent. The corporate tax rate is 22 percent. a. What is the company's cost of equity capital?
b. What is the company's unlevered cost of equity capital?
c-1. What would the cost of equity be if the debt-equity ratio were 2?
c-2. What would the cost of equity be if the debt-equity ratio were 1.0?
c-3. What would the cost of equity be if the debt-equity ratio were zero?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: a. WACC = Ke(E/V} + kd(D/V)(1-T)

                            9.1 = ke(100/160) + 6.4(60/160)(1-0.22)

                            9.1 = ke(0.625) + 2.4(0.78)

                            9.1 = 0.625ke + 1.872

                  9.1-1.872 = 0.625ke

                        7.228 = 0.625ke

                              ke = 7.228/0.625

                               ke = 11.56%

                b. WACC = Ke(E/V)

                          9.1   = ke(100/160)    

                          9.1   = 0.625ke

                           ke = 9.1/0.625

                           ke = 14.56%

                 c-1.    WACC = Ke(E/V} + kd(D/V)(1-T)

                                 9.1  = ke(1/3) + 6.4(2/3)(1-0.22)

                                 9.1  = 0.3333ke + 3.328

                     9.1 - 3.328 = 0.3333ke

                            5.772   = 0.3333ke

                                 ke = 5.772/0.3333

                                 ke = 17.32%

   

                    c-2.     9.1 = ke(1/2) + 6.4(1/2)(1-0.22)  

                                9.1 = 0.5ke   + 2.496

                   9.1 - 2.496 = 0.5ke

                           6.604 = 0.5ke

                                ke = 6.604/0.5

                                ke = 13.21%

             

                   c-3.  9.1 = ke (0/0) + kd (0/)

                            ke = 0%

Explanation:

a. in the a part of the question, the debt-equity ratio was 0.6 ie 60/100. Thus, the value of the firm equals 160. The figures given in the question were substituted in the formula. Cost of equity was not provided, therefore, it becomes the subject of the formula. The variables are defined as follows:

ke = Cost of equity = ?

kd = Cost of debt  = 6.4%

 E = Value of equity = 100

 D = Value of debt = 60

 V = Value of the firm ie E + D = 100 + 60 = 160

 T = Tax rate = 22% = 0.22

b. In this part of the question, only equity would be considered since we are calculating unlevered cost of equity. The part of the formula that deals with debt will be ignored.

c-1.  In this case, the debt-equity ratio is 2. Therefore, debt equals 2 while equity is 1. The value of the firm becomes 3. There is need to substitute these values in the original formula while other variables remain constant.

c-2. In this scenario, the debt-equity ratio is 1. Thus, equity is 1 and debt is also 1. The value of the company changes to 2. These new values would be substituted in the formula in order to obtain the new cost of equity.

c-3. since the debt-equity ratio is 0, therefore, the cost of equity equals 0.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

a. The company's cost of equity capital is 8.6014%. b. The company's unlevered cost of equity capital is 5.8729%. c-1. If the debt-equity ratio were 2, the cost of equity would be 8.6788%. c-2. If the debt-equity ratio were 1.0, the cost of equity would be 8.8894%. c-3. If the debt-equity ratio were zero, the cost of equity would be 5.8729%.

Explanation:

a. The formula to calculate the cost of equity capital is: Cost of Equity = WACC - (Debt/Equity) * (WACC - Cost of Debt) * (1 - Tax Rate). So, by plugging in the given values, we get Cost of Equity = 9.1% - 0.6 * (9.1% - 6.4%) * (1 - 0.22) = 9.1% - 0.6 * 2.7% * 0.78 = 9.1% - 0.4986% = 8.6014%.

b. The unlevered cost of equity capital can be calculated using the formula: Unlevered Cost of Equity = Cost of Equity / (1 + (Debt/Equity) * (1 - Tax Rate)). So, by plugging in the given values, we get Unlevered Cost of Equity = 8.6014% / (1 + 0.6 * 0.78) = 8.6014% / 1.468 = 5.8729%.

c-1. If the debt-equity ratio were 2, the new cost of equity can be calculated using the same formula as in part a. By plugging in the new debt-equity ratio, we get Cost of Equity = 9.1% - 2 * (9.1% - 6.4%) * (1 - 0.22) = 9.1% - 2 * 2.7% * 0.78 = 9.1% - 0.4212% = 8.6788%.

c-2. If the debt-equity ratio were 1.0, the new cost of equity can be calculated using the same formula as in part a. By plugging in the new debt-equity ratio, we get Cost of Equity = 9.1% - 1.0 * (9.1% - 6.4%) * (1 - 0.22) = 9.1% - 1.0 * 2.7% * 0.78 = 9.1% - 0.2106% = 8.8894%.

c-3. If the debt-equity ratio were zero (meaning no debt), the new cost of equity would be the same as the unlevered cost of equity calculated in part b, which is 5.8729%.

Learn more about Cost of Equity Capital here:

brainly.com/question/33955975

#SPJ2


Related Questions

Many people have argued that the skills needed to be successful in today's workforce have changed. What skills do you feel an individual needs to be successful in a job today? Why do you feel these skills are most important? In an essay to be read by your instructor, identify the skills you feel are most needed by an individual to be successful at work and provide reasons to persuade your instructor that these are the most critical skills for success.
Dawson Corporation has the following information available for 2014: (in millions) Issued common stock $45 Retired common stock $65 Paid dividends $75 Net income $130 Beginning Common Stock balance $625 Beginning Retained Earnings balance $475 Based on this information, what is Dawson's Retained Earnings balance at the end of the year? a. $680 b. $530 c. $420 d. $605
In January, Knox Company requisitions raw materials for production as follows: Job 1 $936, Job 2 $1,690, Job 3 $767, and general factory use $667.Prepare a summary journal entry to record raw materials used:DEBIT CREDITWork in Process InventoryJan 31. Manufacturing OverheadRaw Materials Inventory
On January 1, Song Corp. receives a $100,000, two-year, note receivable from a customer in exchange for payment of goods. The note has a 12% effective interest rate. On December 31, when Song records interest for the year, Song will record
Mitchell, a calendar year taxpayer, is the sole proprietor of a fast-food restaurant. His adjusted basis for the building and the related land is $450,000. On March 4, 2013, state authorities notify Mitchell that his property is going to be condemned so that the highway can be widened. On June 20, Mitchell’s property is officially condemned, and he receives an award of $625,000. Because Mitchell’s business has been successful in the past, he would like to reopen the restaurant in a new location. a. What is the earliest date Mitchell can acquire a new restaurant and qualify for § 1033 postponement? b. On June 30, Mitchell purchases land and a building for $610,000. Assuming thathe elects postponement of gain under § 1033, what is his recognized gain?c. What is Mitchell’s adjusted basis for the new land and building?d. If he does not elect § 1033, what are Mitchell’s recognized gain and adjustedbasis?e. Suppose he invests the $625,000 condemnation proceeds in the stock market onJune 30. What is Mitchell’s recognized gain?

A company advertises that its products are environmentally friendly in order to sell to climate-conscious consumers at a higher price. What is this practice called?

Answers

Answer: Greenwashing

Explanation:

Greenwashing is the process of giving out a false impression or misleading the public about how the product of a company are more environmentally friendly. Companies have used greenwashing in commercials and press releases emphasizing their pollution minimization efforts and clean energy but in reality, the firm may not have a genuine commitment to environmental friendliness. Companies that make such claims are embroiled in greenwashing.

For example, a company might claim that their goods are made from recycled materials and this may be false. This is greenwashing.

On January 1, Year 1, Milton Manufacturing Company purchased equipment with a list price of $88,000. A total of $4,000 was paid for installation and testing. During the first year, Milton paid $6,000 for insurance on the equipment and another $2,200 for routine maintenance and repairs. Milton uses the units-of-production method of depreciation. Useful life is estimated at 100,000 units, and estimated salvage value is $8,000. During Year 1, the equipment produced 13,000 units. What is the amount of depreciation for Year 1?

Answers

Answer:

The depreciation expense for Year 1 is $9880

Explanation:

The cost of equipment to be recorded in the books is the price at which it was purchased and the cost incurred to bring it to intended use that is the installation cost. Thus, the cost of the equipment in the books will be recorded as,

Equipment = 88000 + 4000 = $84000

The insurance and maintenance are recurring expenses and are not capitalized.

The depreciation rate under units of production method is,

Depreciation rate = (cost - salvage value) / estimated useful life in units

Depreciation rate = (84000 - 8000) / 100000  =  $0.76 per unit

The depreciation expense for Year 1 = 0.76 * 13000 = $9880

Answer:

$10,920

Explanation:

Cost of equipment = List price of equipment + Cost of installation and testing

                     $88,000 + $4,000 = $92,000

Salvage value = $8,000

Depreciation cost of equipment = Cost of equipment - salvage value

              $92,000 - $8,000 = $84,000

Estimated unit of production = 100,000 units

Year 1 units produced = 13,000 units

Depreciation = $84,000 * 13,000 / 100,000

                    = $10,920

Fixed expenses are $521,000 per month. The company is currently selling 7,000 units per month. Management is considering using a new component that would increase the unit variable cost by $6. Since the new component would increase the features of the company's product, the marketing manager predicts that monthly sales would increase by 500 units. What should be the overall effect on the company's monthly net operating income of this change

Answers

Answer:

Increase in Variable costs= $45,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Fixed expenses are $521,000 per month. The company is currently selling 7,000 units per month. Management is considering using a new component that would increase the unit variable cost by $6. Since the new component would increase the features of the company's product, the marketing manager predicts that monthly sales would increase by 500 units.

Increase in Variable costs= 7500 * 6= 45,000

suppose the transfers of pillars to the lantern would reduce sales to outside customers by 15000. whats the lowest transfer price that would

Answers

Answer:

$1.20

Explanation:

Variable cost per pillar is $0.80, there is demand of pillar for 15000 by an outside customer. The selling cost is around $0.40. The total variable cost is $1.20, this is minimum transfer price that can be set by the supplier.

Landis received $90,000 cash and a capital asset (basis of $50,000, fair market value of $60,000) in a proportionate liquidating distribution. His basis in his partnership interest was $120,000 prior to the distribution. How much gain or loss does Landis recognize, and what is his basis in the asset received?a. $0 gain or loss; $30,000 basis.b. $0 gain or loss; $50,000 basis.
c. $0 gain or loss; $60,000 basis.
d. $20,000 gain; $50,000 basis.
e. $30,000 gain; $60,000 basis.

Answers

Answer:

a. $0 gain or loss; $30,000 basis.

Explanation:

Since the partnership is being liquidated, Landis doesn't have to recognize any gain or loss resulting from the liquidation because the cash amount that he is receiving is less than his partnership interest. The asset's basis = $120,000 - $90,000 (cash) = $30,000, regardless of its current market value or prior basis.

What insight does ROI give into investment performance? Is it acceptable to lose profit on one product, if that product is vital to the sale of an extremely profitable product? Why?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

Return on investment (ROI) can be defined as a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or to compare the efficiency of a number of investments.

The ability to calculate return on investment is particularly valuable for any business regardless of its size or industry. by calculating ROI, an individual can understand how well their business is doing and which areas needs improvement.

Every business decision requires knowldge of ROI, so as to optimize profitability. Yes it is acceptable to loose profit of one product for the sale of a profitable product because the gain that would be derived by selling an extremely profitable products is better for the company that the gain one product will derive. Afterall, every company wants to increase profitability.

Other Questions