Answer: D
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Debt from years of fighting wars
Explanation:
Fighting many expensive wars was the main cause for Britain's financial problems in the mid-1700s and their national debt.
The French and Indian War was especially costly, almost doubling Britain's debt. This led Britain to impose taxes on the colonists to get some money back.
Britain's financial problems in the mid-1700s were primarily caused by the massive debt incurred from the Seven Years' War - a costly global conflict. Maintaining colonies and military protection also added to the financial strain.
The primary cause of Britain's financial problems in the mid-1700s was the debt from years of fighting wars, specifically the Seven Years' War. This global conflict, also known as the French and Indian War, was expensive for Britain. Investing in this war resulted in the accumulation of massive debts. Besides the war expenses, Britain also had to maintain its colonies worldwide and the subsequent military protection they required. Additionally, the industrial progress during this period required resources, further straining the national treasury.
#SPJ3
Answer:
He was director of the antiradicalism division in the Department of Justice.
Explanation:
Apex "At the Berlin Conference of 1884"
b.driving up costs
c.increasing profits
d.combining resources
Answer: c.increasing profits.
Cartels, monopolies, trusts, as well as horizontal and vertical integration all share the goal of increasing profits, which is the main goal of almost any business strategy. However, they are slightly different in their approaches. Monopolies and horizontal and vertical integration try to decrease competition in order to increase the portion of the market that a producer has access to. Cartels operate in a similar way. However, they require cooperation with other producers, as opposed to individual action.
B. Locke largely rejected the principles of freedom and equality that were part of liberalism. C. Locke argued that people have the right to overthrow governments that violate their rights.
D. Locke suggested that people were naturally selfish and needed to be ruled by absolute monarchs.
The social contract was interpreted differently by John Locke and Thomas Hobbes in that, Locke argued that people have the right to overthrow governments that violate their rights.
The social contract, according to Locke and Hobbes, was an agreement made by individuals to establish a government. But according to Locke, a government can only be considered legitimate if,
It upholds a person's inherent rights, such as their right to life, liberty, and property. People have the right to overturn governments that violate these rights. Hobbes, on the other hand, held the view that the people had no right to remove the government since it had total control over them.
Therefore, The primary distinction between Thomas Hobbes' and John Locke's conceptions of the social contract is that Locke thought that people had the right to overturn governments that infringed their rights, whereas Hobbes thought that the government had unrestricted authority over the populace.
Learn more about social contract, here:
#SPJ4