Scenario: Phillip and Joseph are two classmates who represented their college in a quiz competition as a team and won $500. However, the winning amount was handed over by the organizers to their professor who had accompanied them. The professor gave the money to Phillip and asked him to offer any amount he wants to Joseph. If Joseph accepts the offer, the money would be split in the decided proportion between them. However, if Joseph rejects the offer, the money would go to their college fund. Refer to the scenario above. If Joseph prefers fairness to money, ________. Phillip will offer the minimum amount of money to Joseph he will always accept any offer made to him he will accept the offer if offered an equal share of the money he will not accept any offer made by Phillip

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The correct answer is : he will accept the offer if offered an equal share of the money

Explanation:

It's just a matter of being fair-minded.  This trait helps people, in this case these two classmates, develop mutually supportive relationships for future competitions and it will make the friendship stronger.  Any of them would feel in a disadvantaged position.


Related Questions

What for did the God osiris play in Egyptian religious belief
Which of the following is not a way in which carbon sequestration can benefit soil?a. decreased erosion b. increased water quality c. increased water storage d. increased soil quality
During the Renaissance more Europeans became increasingly interested in
When trying to convince her friend to come to a party, Annette said, "You can either come to the party with me and have a great time, or you can stay home and have the most boring night of your life? Which is it going to be?" What kind of reasoning fallacy is Annette using?
What is the effect of the Caribbean Sea staying warm most of the year

Which of the following is a reasonable amount of time to wait before an officer forcibly enters the home after notifying the inhabitants of his presence? A. It depends on the nature of the offense in questionB. The amount of time varies with the circumstancesC. As much as 5 minutes 30 seconds

Answers

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The amount of time varies with the circumstances. Usually an officer must possess an warrant and announce who they are before entering a home either for arrest or search. However, an exception can occur where the officer can enter forcibly without warrant in order to prevent someone being killed or tampering with an evidence. The amount of resonable time to wait depends the type of exigent circumstances in question

The gobi desert sits on a __________ atop a high plateau.

Answers

The Gobi desert sits on a high, cold desert atop a high plateau

Answer:

B. Basin

Explanation:

I just took the test.

A utility company that provides electricity to a large portion of a county is an example of a

Answers

an organization that maintains the infrastructure for a public service public utilities are subject to forms of public control and regulations ranging from local comunnity-based groups to statewidegovernment monopolies

Answer:

Explanation: he’s right

yesterday the boys ? hurried, hurries, hurrys, hurry,. down the passage to get to get examination room on time​

Answers

Answer:

hurried

Explanation:

its in the past, which you can see with yesterday, so they cant be currently doing it. the only past tense of hurry is hurried

Studies on the big five factors of personality found that transition into late adulthood was characterized by increases in the aspects of impulse control, reliability, and conventionality. to which big five personality factor do these aspects belong?

Answers

The answer is "Conscientiousness".

Conscientiousness is the personality trait of being cautious, or careful. Conscientiousness infers a want to complete an assignment well, and to consider commitments to others important. Honest individuals have a tendency to be effective and composed rather than agreeable and messy.

What does it mean when your unemployment is in adjudication

Answers

Answer: Firstly, adjudication a judgment or a sentence. A decision upon the question of whether a claim is true or false.

So therefore, for an unemployment to be in adjudication, it means that the case about an unemployment issue has been returned to the original-decision making place to judge if the claim is valid.