since the abolition of the fairness doctrine who or what controls the amount of time given to opposing viewpoints

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The fairness doctrine was a former US policy that required TV and radio broadcasters to present opposing viewpoints on any controversial topic that was important to the public. The abolition of this rule allowed one-sided networks to gain prominence. Now, nothing controls the amount of time given to opposing viewpoints. Networks can independently control this. 

Related Questions

There are 12 cookies.3 cookies fill a snack bag .How many snack bags can be filled.
Whats the 5th amendment?​
A conclusion based on evidence is an example of???
Read the summary of Romeo and Juliet act 1 and explain the main events in the plot in your own words
A reference to a person, place, or thing outside of the text is a(n) a0.

Description about a fake super hero??

Answers

Your superhero name is:The Multiple CraniumYou are a professional thief who's just stolen a weird technological gizmo from a scientist – only to find that using the device transforms you in a bizarre and amazing way! You can now use your powers for good – if you can avoid being caught by the scientist responsible…Doppelganger - You have the ability to generate up to six identical copies of yourself enabling you to accomplish tasks faster and bewilder your opponents!and...Telepathy - You are able to read minds, communicate mentally, and even explore deep into another person's consciousness.Now, you protect Hillvalley from time-travelling bad guys, while also battling the evil plans of The Ellipse!

PLEASE HELP ASAP Why is it important to trace the connections between the practices of enslaved Africans and American culture?

Answers

Well not only is it away to learn about the history if what happened, but I agree with Luxy, and that the practices make us more aware about the future and what problems it will bring.

what is the only part of a sentence that can ever be implied in English? a. subject. b. predicate. c. direct object. d. object of a preposition

Answers

The only part of a sentence that can ever be implied in English is an Object of a Preposition.


The answer is d)  object of a preposition.

The subject tells what the sentence is about.

The predicate explains the subject.

The direct object receives the action of a verb or can show the result of the action done.

Hope it helps:)


As I stood on the beach, the warm sea breeze brushed my face softly as the fiery orange sunset cast ribbons of light across the surface of the ocean.

A. Antithesis
B. Pun
C. Irony
D. Imagery

Answers

Answer: D. Imagery.

Explanation: Imagery is a literary device used when writing and consists in using figurative language to represent objects, actions, and ideas in a way that appeals to our physical senses. The word imagery is associated most of the time with mental pictures. In the given sentence we can see a clear example of imagery, the speaker uses figurative language (like metaphors and personification) to create a mental picture of the place he is in.

I would mark this answer as D, imagery. Because you have a descriptive seen and they as painting an image of what is around the characters POV.

The fragment of an asteroid or any interplanetary material is known as a A. moon.
B. shower material.
C. meteoroid.
D. limestone dignitary satellite

Answers

It would always from today be called C : a Meteoroid plus A is wrong you could cancel that out the same with D , but B is reasonable but the answer is C
dose this help?
Please make my answer the Brainliest.
Meteoroids are fragments of planets or asteroids.

Let me walk three weeks in the footsteps of my enemy, carry the same burden, have the same trials as he, before I say one word to criticize.

Answers

If you're referring to the one who quote that sentence, it would be unknown, but it is a really famous quote.

If you wanted to restates the main idea of this quotation , it would be : it's not good to criticize others because we don't know that they face in life.

hope this helps

Answer:B.) It’s not good to criticize others because we don’t know what they face in life. The idea is first to try to understand what the motivations are before we engage in criticism.

The first option mentions the limit of three weeks, in the quotation three weeks can be understood as a period to have an understanding of the other's intentions, it is not a number to be interpreted literally.