He defeated the forces left behind by Alexander the Great.
He was defeated by Alexander the Great's army.
He killed Alexander the Great during a battle.
According to the sentence, the relationship that Chandragupta Maurya have with Alexander the Great include option B: He defeated the forces left behind by Alexander the Great.
Maurya empire was ruled by the Maurya dynasty from 322 - 185 BCE, and by 316 BCE they had fully occupied northwestern India.
Chandragupta Maurya was the Mauryan ruler who defeated Alexanders general Seleucus indicator and received the territories of Kabul and Balochistan in 305 BC.
Therefore, correct option is B.
Learn more about Alexander, refer to the link:
Answer:
He defeated the Magadha ruler, who was known for cruelty.
Explanation:
i did the test
I always like to quote Rhett Butler (main character of Gone With the Wind). The valiant men were talking how glorious it would be to fight in the civil war. They asked him what he thought.
He answer, "The South will Loose." The other men there were horrified. Ashley, who had more sense than the rest, said "Why, sir, is that?"
Rhett said. "The south doesn't produce 1 cannon. It doesn't make one gun." He was saying the south was not prepared (industrialized enough) to fight a war. He could have also said that the transportation system did not serve the south well: all the north had to do was blockade the ports which they proceeded to do. That meant the south couldn't get it's cotton out to be sold to the Europeans.
The south was primarily an agricultural economy, which served them well in the beginning of the war. They had a vastly superior cavalry with exceptional generals. But Rhett's observation came to haunt them. They north could replace the number of men lost in battle. They could manufacture ships and cannons and guns. They could overcome the minus's by depending on a president who was patient and had a goal that he never deviated from.
Though the generals like McClelland sometimes frustrated him,he was patient and waited for people like Grant and Sherman came along who were ruthless leaders, but they were winners.
The northern states experienced an industrial and market revolution centered on manufacturing, while the southern states' economy was based on agriculture, specifically cotton production, and depended heavily on slave labor. The North was more technologically advanced, which facilitated a wide-reaching market and manufacturing economy. In contrast, the South, despite being wealthy due to cotton exports, faced challenges due to its dependence on slave labor and lack of industrialization.
In the early and mid 1800s, there were significant differences in the economies of the northern and southern states. The northern states had a thriving industrial sector, with a market economy largely centered on manufacturing and factory work advanced by the Industrial Revolution. They produced a variety of goods for domestic and international markets, facilitated by improvements in transportation such as railroads. On the other hand, the southern states relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production, which made the United States the world leader in this field. Slave labor was crucial to the southern economy, underpinning its massive cotton production. Although the South played a substantial role in the global cotton market, it also depended on the North for manufactured goods, food, and loans.
The prosperity of the North was greatly aided by their technological advances, increasing population, and far-reaching railway network, while the South, although wealthy from cotton exports, faced difficulties due to its dependency on slavery and relative lack of industrialization.
#SPJ12
Answer:
A is the answer
Explanation:
I took the quiz
Great Britain got huge gains in territory, and France gave up most of their land.
Wearing arm bands
1st amendment (freedom of speech), 4th, 2nd&5th
A high school student's sexual innuendo-laden speech during a school assembly was not constitutionally protected.