Which of the following statements about organic farming is false

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Organic farming is a farming method of livestock and crop production that do not involve the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, GMOs and other chemical substances. They rather opt to use fertilizers that comes from biomass like manure, compost and bone meal.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

Organic farming is a farming method of livestock and crop production that do not involve the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, GMOs and other chemical substances.

Explanation:


Related Questions

Which of the following was a similarity between classical Mesoamerican and South American religions? A)They were not separated from civilizations’ governments. B)They contained elements of both monotheism and polytheism. C)They promoted peace and did not allow violence. D)They disappeared by the end of the classical era.
Jews were severely persecuted following the fall of this nation to the German army.
Which civilization built ziggurats and used cuneiform to record information?Indus ValleyEgyptChinaMesopotamia
Who was Francisco Franco?
With whom does congress share the foreign relations powers?a. President of the Senate c. Vice-President b. President d. Speaker of the House

The reaper was invented by:Cyrus Field
James Howe
Eli Whitney
Cyrus McCormick

Answers

Hello!

The correct answer is Cyrus McCormick.

The reaper is a farm implement invented in 1831 by Cyrus McCormick. This machine was used by farmers to harvest crops mechanically, this semi automated device made easier to harvest wheat.

Hope this helps.


Answer: The reaper was invented by Cyrus McCormick.

Which empire did Hernando Cortés overthrow for Spain A.the Inca B.the Aztec C.the Maya D.the Toltec

Answers

the Aztec empire is the answer

Ronald Reagan appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court. What was her name?a. Ruth Bader Ginsburg
c. Sandra Day O Connor
b. Sonia Sotomayor
d. Elena Kagan

Answers

It is c.sandra day o Connor

What was the political significance of the great compromise and the three-fifths compromise?

Answers

Answer:

The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.

The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South. For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,

Final answer:

The Great Compromise proposed a bicameral congress to achieve political balance between small and large states, and the Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of enslaved persons for federal representation and taxation, giving extra political power to slave states. Both compromises significantly shaped the U.S. political landscape.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise had significant political implications for the formation and structure of the United States government. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, proposed a bicameral congress. It assuaged the fears of both small and large states by allowing for variable representation: equal representation for each state in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on state population.

The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's representation in the House of Representatives and its federal tax bill. This compromise effectively gave extra political power to slave states and had a profound impact on the political balance between the North and South. However, it also entrenched racial prejudice in the Constitution by implying that enslaved people were less than fully human.

Both compromises played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. political landscape. They determined how states were represented in the federal government and managed contentious issues like slavery, ensuring the preservation of the Union.

Learn more about Great Compromise and Three-Fifths Compromise here:

brainly.com/question/6839536

#SPJ3

Two days after Hitler s invasion of ____, Britain and France declared war on Germany.a. Poland
b. Slovakia
c. France
d. Austria

Answers

The answer is letter A. In 1939, After Hitler invaded Poland, Germany and France had declared war against Germany. During this war, Britain had suffered a great damage after Germany had made Athenia, a British ocean liner   sunk by one of its German submarines. The US remained neutral despite that death of 28 American who boarded in Athenia

MC)What was the main motivation for the U.S. to become involved in the completion of the Panama Canal? The canal would remove trade barriers between the United States and South America.
The United States would economically benefit from control of the canal zone.
Panama would become a protectorate of the United States.
The United States would eliminate the European financial presence in Central America.

(MC)Which of the following was a prominent argument used to support the United States’ acquisition of overseas territories during the late 19th century?

The United States had a divine destiny to dominate the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.
The United States needed access to raw materials and different regions for American-made goods.
The United States needed a colonial empire to provide men for military selection.
The United States was the only nation with the military power to stop the spread of communism in the developing world.
Points earned on this question: 0

Answers

1)  The United States would economically benefit from control of the canal zone.

2) A or B
The United States had a divine destiny to dominate the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.The United States needed access to raw materials and different regions for American-made goods.The United States needed a colonial empire to compete with the European colonial powers.The United States was the only nation with the military power to stop the spread of communism in the developing world.