Under the U.S. Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, if a firm has developed a strong ethics program, corporate executives found guilty of criminal activity may have their sentence:a. Decided by the company.
b. Reduced.
c. Increased.
d. Unaffected.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: may have their sentence reduced.

Explanation: The United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines are rules that set out policies for sentencing individuals and corporations. The rules support Various adjustments and depending on the gravity of the offence, there can be reductions in time to be served and Increase in time to be served.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

B. reduced

Explanation:

If an individual in a firm with strong ethics program is guilty of a criminal offence, under the US corporate sentencing guidelines, the individual may have his or her sentence reduced.


Related Questions

And the lord said he who's without sin cast the first stone
Why was gold and salt important to west Africa?
Nuclear power plants require a lot of water to operate. Please select the best answer from the choices provideda. True b. False
Today's scholars emphasize the transactional nature of communication, which means that _____. A. the elements of the process occur in a linear fashion B. the elements simultaneously influence and are influenced by the others C. there must be at least two people involved in the process D. the steps of the communication process occur in the same order
The four main systems of earth are

Families as a whole tend to resist change and strive to preserve what is normal. True or false?

Answers

First of all, it's not exactly clear what is "normal" - this changes from generation to generation and for example the traditional family used to be considered "normal" but now all other kinds of families are normal too.

Second, there is typically a big generational difference between family members, so it's hard to say that they function "as  a whole"

For these reasons I don't think this statement is true. 

Answer:

Actually its True

Normal explains the situation they're in. People don't like moving out there comfort zones so they resist change.

What are some advantages and disadvantages of living in the subarctic?

Answers

Disadvantages: Cold weather, might be in a remote spot, not connected with a lot of the world

Advantages: Spread out, Experience a different climate

Final answer:

The subarctic region offers abundant natural resources, unique flora and fauna, and a peaceful lifestyle. However, it poses challenges such as extreme weather conditions, isolation, limited accessibility, fewer job opportunities and high cost of living.

Explanation:

Living in the subarctic region has both advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is the abundant natural resources such as oil, gas, and minerals like gold and diamonds. It offers a quiet, peaceful lifestyle with stunning natural scenery that many people enjoy. Also, there is a unique blend of flora and fauna specific to this region.

However, this region has some disadvantages. Extreme weather conditions with harsh and long winters can be challenging. Life can be extremely difficult due to the isolation, limited accessibility, and scarcity of certain commodities. There are fewer job opportunities and high cost of living. Also, the survival of the indigenous communities and their lifestyles is under threat due to climate change.

Learn more about Life in Subarctic here:

brainly.com/question/33449162

#SPJ2

which of the following lists minerals in order of hardness from lowest to highest on the Mohs hardness scale?

Answers

The list of minerals in hardness from lowest to highest on the Mohs hardness scale is Talc and Gypsum with 1 and 3 levels of hardness respectively.

What is the Mohs hardness scale?

The technique used to assess the minerals is known as the Mohs Hardness scale. To determine the hardness of any mineral, scratching it to another substance having similar or more hardness on the Mohs Hardness scale.

Following is the list of minerals along with their level of hardness:

Mineral             Absolute Hardness

Talc                                 1

Gypsum                          3

Calcite                            9

Fluorite                          21

Apatite                           48

Orthoclase feldspar       72

Quartz                            100

Topaz                             200

Corundum                      400

Diamond                        1600

Therefore, Talc is having the lowest hardness, and diamond is having highest hardness according to the scale.

Learn more about Mohs hardness scale, here:

brainly.com/question/12516212

#SPJ2

Here is the list of Minerals in order of Hardness from lowest to highest on the Mohs Hardness Scale:

Mineral          Absolute Hardness
Talc                                1
Gypsum                         3
Calcite                           9
Fluorite                         21
Apatite                          48
Orthoclase feldspar      72
Quartz                          100
Topaz                            200
Corundum                     400
Diamond                      1600

Jacobi is visiting Sheila at her apartment while she is redecorating, and Sheila asks him if he would like to buy her two sofas that she is replacing. Sheila tells Jacobi that the sofas are in great condition and are the most comfortable she has ever had. She acknowledges that some of the fabric on the sofas is slightly worn but says that is their only issue. Jacobi buys the sofas on the spot, but once they are back at his house he finds that one of them is infested with bed bugs. Jacobi has to throw out the infested sofa and pay a special exterminator to come and get rid of the insects. Jacobi sues Sheila. Assume their jurisdiction follows the majority approach. How will the court rule?

Answers

Answer:    If Sheila had a reasonable belief that she was telling the truth, Jacobi can rescind the contract, but he cannot collect damages.

Explanation:  From the given text it can be concluded that Sheila did not intend to deceive Jacobi, that is, she was telling the truth when she claimed that the sofas were in good condition, except that the only issue was that the fabric on the sofas was slightly worn. Because this is an unintentional mistake, that is, Sheila's claim that everything else with the sofas is okay, Jacobi can rescind the contract but cannot collect damages.

Chloe voted for the first time in the 2016 elections. She was very motivated to understand campaign issues and to make an informed choice at the polls. She read the newspapers and watched the television debates between the candidates. Motivated and informed when she watched the presidential debates between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, Chloe was most likely to pay attention to __________.

Answers

Answer:

The candidate's disagreements on education issues

Explanation:

In the 2016 election, Chloe voted for the first time.

She was well informed about the issues and debates of the Presidential candidates. She reads newspaper regularly to keep her updated on election issues.

Chloe is highly motivated and she watches the presidential debates in the televisions between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. While watching and listening carefully to their debates, Chloe is more likely to pay attention to the candidate's disagreements on the education issues being a student herself.

Chloe, a student, is highly motivated about the education issues that candidates are debating.

Thus the answer is

The candidate's disagreements on education issues

Final answer:

Chloe likely paid attention to factors such as the candidates' policies, values, standpoints, and demographic traits during the 2016 presidential debates. The candidates' policies and previous public service were also important considerations due to her informed approach to the elections.

Explanation:

Given Chloe's high level of motivation and informed approach to the 2016 elections, it's very likely that she paid keen attention to factors such as the candidates' policies, the issues raised during the debates, and their respective values and standpoints. As someone reading newspapers and watching the debates, she was likely not just looking at their personality traits, but also at their proposed policies and their stand on issues important to her such as education, health care, economy, etc.

For instance, Chloe might have been guided by her own demographic, therefore, considering factors such as gender and age. Perhaps she felt drawn to Hillary Clinton as the first woman nominee from a major party. Alternatively, she might've focused on policies, considering elements like Bernie Sanders' promise for free college tuition. The candidates' background and previous public service also mattered quite likely: Donald Trump, a well-known business tycoon and TV personality, versus Hillary Clinton, a former First Lady, senator, and Secretary of State.

In conclusion, Chloe's approach indicates she was likely to pay attention to a combination of demographic traits, political values, and policy proposals when watching the 2016 presidential debates.

Learn more about Political Understanding here:

brainly.com/question/28484079

#SPJ11

A(n) _____ is a formal meeting between an employer and a job applicanta. background check
b. gatekeeper
c. interview
d. personality test

Answers

I believe the answer is: C. interview


Option A is wrong because Background check is being done by the HR by researching your information online. So you would not meet with HR face to face.


Option B is wrong because screening applicants' cv without meeting them is also considered as gatekeeper


Option D is wrong because personality test is often carried out through questionnaires,

This would be a job interview - the correct answer is c). A job interview is often a very formal meeting during which the employer examines the skills of the applicant.

It can be preceded by a background check of the applicant, but this is not always the case.