When banks provide information about savings accounts, they typically quote the interest rates they offer (e.g. 1%) on a...A. Per day basis
B. Per month basis
C. Per six months basis
D. Annual basis

Answer:researchers should use caution when accessing information from Wikipedia, online forums and blogs.

In conducting research for homework or an academic paper, you are basically conducting a search for facts: little tidbits of truth that you will assemble and arrange in an organized fashion to make an original point or claim. Your responsibility as a researcher is to understand the difference between fact and fiction, as well as the difference between fact and opinion.

When beginning your next assignment that requires sources, consider the credibility of those sources before including them in your final project.

Here are some common sources to avoid; each of these may include opinions and works of fiction disguised as facts.

Blogs

As you know, anyone can publish a blog on the Internet. The problem with using a blog as a research source is there no way to know the credentials of many bloggers or to get an understanding of the writer’s level of expertise.

People often create blogs to give themselves a forum to express their views and opinions. And many of these people consult less than reliable sources to form their beliefs. You could use a blog for a quote, but never use a blog as a serious source of facts for a research paper.

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. ... Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.

Same also goes with online forum

Answer:

(A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers. - The Unfair-Competition Argument

Some Governments subsidise production for their companies which means that their companies are able to sell goods cheaper than the producers in the countries they export to. This is considered Unfair competition.

B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers. - National-Security Argument

Some goods produced by domestic producers need to be protected for national defense purposes and sometimes some of these producers exaggerate the importance of their goods so that the Government can protect them from foreign competition thus enabling them to charge consumers higher prices.

(C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs. - The Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument

Sometimes a country might threaten to impose restrictions for instance the United States on China which would make things more expensive for Americans and if they do not then it would look like China won the argument which would make the US lose face.

(D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living. - The Jobs Argument

David Ricardo's Comparative Advantage principle believes that free trade will lead to more jobs in the country because the country will be able to properly harness those goods it is better at producing.

The given rebuttals address the Unfair-Competition Argument, the National-Security Argument, the Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument, and the Jobs Argument in the debate over Restricting trade.

In this question, the student is asked to identify which arguments for restricting trade each of the given rebuttals is directed against. Here are the answers:

• (A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers. - This rebuttal directly addresses the Unfair-Competition Argument.
• (B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers. - This rebuttal directly addresses the National-Security Argument.
• (C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs. - This rebuttal directly addresses the Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument.
• (D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living. - This rebuttal directly addresses the Jobs Argument.

Learn more about Restricting trade arguments here:

brainly.com/question/32634922

#SPJ3

Answer:

Market sell order for 1,500 shares

Explanation:

The type of order that Marcos should place is Market sell order for 1,500 shares because he already owns 1,500 shares of the ABC stock in which the ABC stock shares was purchased at $44 per share.

Since the stock has been decreasing in value in which he wants to cut his losses now because the stock price may continue to decrease, the best thing for him to do is to use the Market sell order for the 1,500 shares in order to cut the losses that may arise and to avoid losing all the Total amount of the shares bought which is $66,000 ( 1,500 shares ×$44).

Answer:

Today, the investment is worth $31,997.29

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

An investment offers $5,900 per year for 15 years, with the first payment occurring one year from now. The required return is 6 percent

First, we need to calculate the final value, using the following formula:

FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i

A= annual pay= 5,900

n= 15

i= 0.06

FV= {5,900*[(1.06^15)-1]} / 0.06= $137,328.22

Now, we can determine the present value:

PV= FV/ (1+i)^n

PV= 137,328.22/ 1.06^25= $31,997.29

Answer:

The 90% confidence interval is c) $45.3637, $62.6363

Explanation:

Hi, since we need to find the Z value from the standard deviation table that would substract an equal area from both size of the normal distribution graph, we can tell that the probability that we have to rate into account is 5% (I mean,  10%, which we substract from both sides 5%), and the Z number for a probability of 5% is -1.645 which is the lower end of the interval, and due to symmetry, the higher end of the interval would be 1.645.

Now, we need to use the following formula in order to find the lower and higher ends of the interval.

Where:

C.L = Confidence Level

Mean = in our case, $54

StdDev = $21

n = sample sizes, in our case, that would be 16

So, the lower level would be

Therefore:

So, the interval in order to have 90% confidence is c. [$45.3637, $62.6363]

Two prominent sets of motives under regulatory focus theory are termed Promotion and prevention.

What is regulatory focus theory?

According to the regulatory focus hypothesis, people can work toward objectives with either a promotion or a preventive emphasis. People who aim for advancement interpret pleasure as the accomplishment of their aims, ambitions, and aspirations, and interpret suffering as their absence.

Motives assume that emotional trade-offs between both the coexisting motivational systems on promotion and prevention will always happen. Promotion-oriented people are opportunistic and look for real experiences as motivation to develop action-oriented objectives, which are necessary to getting outcomes.

People who have a prevention orientation are extremely optimistic and see keeping things as they are and preventing bad things from happening as their defining and overriding motives.

To learn more about regulatory focus theory

brainly.com/question/5896409

#SPj2