What is just or right is prior to and independent of any particular conception of the good life.
Thus, the correct option is C.
When referring to mental or emotional states, happiness is any positive or pleasurable feeling, from contentment to ecstatic delight.
Other types include eudaimonia, thriving, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, and well-being.
The pursuit of happiness, as defined by Thomas Jefferson and Aristotle, is the second one, which is eudaemonia, the good life. They did not mean to giddily smile a lot. Aristotle discusses the benefits of thoughtful reflection and enjoyable discourse.
Positive experiences, positive individual characteristics, and positive institutions are the three main pillars of positive psychology.
The excellent life, according to Aristotle, is a happy life. Happiness, he claimed, "is the whole aim and end of human existence, the meaning and purpose of life."
According to Epicurus, the secret to living well is avoiding pain, refraining from pointless wants, and being appreciative of your blessings.
Learn more about good life, here
#SPJ5
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The correct answer is "What is just or right is prior to and independent of any particular conception of the good life."
Answer:
1
Explanation:
According to Google, daily there are 17 meteors hit the Earth on average. In 25 minutes, there are almost no chance you and your friends can observe 52 meteors. Therefore, the probability is 1 (or 100%).
Answer:
your answer it 1
Explanation:
Answer:
C. increased transpiration
Explanation:
if i´m rong just let me know^﹏^^m^
Answer:
C. is your answer
Explanation
i hope im right sorry if im wrong:/
Answer:
The neo-colonial world is described by its existentialist approach where personal freedom is a vital component of human life.
Explanation:
Existentialism refers to the ideology that concerns the existence of man and the importance of individual choices. It lays particular emphasis on the individual's uniqueness in a toxic world, or example the colonial period. Intellectuals of the mid-twentieth century coined the word, which emphasized the personal freedom which to lead a productive life against the existential challenges in the world. in last fifty years the world become particular about the wrath of first fifty years of twentieth-century and thus adopted new methods to avoid such destruction in future.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options or any other reference, we can say that what most likely happened to cool their friendship was the fact that one of them had different expectations about the relationship, while the other did not aspire to reach to the next level and have a romantic relationship. One of them misunderstood the signals of the relationship and confused the fact that they both had so many similarities. That is why is so important to be clear about the role people play in a friendly relationship in order to avoid sending the wrong of confusing signals to the other individual.
In Andrea and Paul's story, the surprise confession of romantic feelings from one friend to the other led to a surprise and tension in their relationship. This shift changed the dynamics of their friendship, introducing caution and wariness where there was previously ease and mutual affection.
The cooling of Andrea and Paul's friendship most likely occurred due to one friend expressing romantic feelings, which was unexpected and perhaps unwanted by the other. The surprise and the addition of unanticipated romantic sentiment to their relationship made the recipient of the confession uneasy, which consequently led to a change, and likely a strain, in their previously uncomplicated friendship. This is a classic case of emotional misalignment in a friendship.
They both had a lot in common, as mentioned, they were even part of the same chess club and shared similar tastes in music. Yet this revelation of romantic interest would have introduced an aspect to their relationship that was not mutual. The cautiousness since the confession could stem from insecurity about how to continue a close friendship without leading on or hurting the one with unrequited feelings.
These sorts of situations call for open communication, respect for each other's feelings, and understanding to navigate the situation well. If not addressed properly, it could lead to the ending of a friendship.
#SPJ3
Big Brother is known as the state of mind based on belief in total obedience to someone else's authority and the administration of that way of thinking through the oppression of one's subordinates.
During his encounter with Julia, there is a brief episode in which he believes to understand the force that will destroy Big Brother. This force is none other than Love and Loyalty. These concepts can be considered as the antithesis of oppression when you compare the actions a leader may apply over his or her subordinates.
a) Sexual well-being
b) Attraction
c) Serial monogamy
d) Moral-normative perception
e) External constraints
Answer:
b) Attraction
Explanation:
The deep desire for each other and the sexual fulfillment in the relationship between Nina and Mitch point to both an emotional and physical attraction for each other. Furthermore, it points out that this attraction is being met, leaving both satisfied with the relationship that is being established.
The deep sense of commitment between Nina and Mitch is best characterized by moral-normative perception. Mitch regards their relationship as 'sacred,' reflecting an obligation based on personal beliefs and moral values, which represents the essence of moral-normative perception.
The commitment between Nina and Mitch, as depicted in the question, is best characterized by d) Moral-normative perception. While sexual well-being and attraction are crucial to their relationship, the question points out a deeper, more profound level of commitment. Moral-normative perception refers to the sense of obligation or duty to continue a relationship based on personal beliefs, moral values, or societal norms.
In this case, Mitch regards their relationship as 'sacred,' indicating a commitment that transcends physical attraction or convenience. This suggests a moral-normative viewpoint, as it encompasses the belief in the sanctity and importance of their partnership. Despite attraction and sexual well-being being parts of their relationship, the moral-normative perception is what defines their commitment.
#SPJ3