Plush Corporation purchased 100 percent of Common Corporation’s common stock on January 1, 20X3, and paid $450,000. The fair value of Common’s identifiable net assets at that date was $430,000. By the end of 20X5, the fair value of Common, which Plush considers to be a reporting unit, had increased to $485,000; however, Plush’s external auditor made a passing comment to the company’s chief accountant that Plush might need to recognize impairment of goodwill on one or more of its investments.Prepare a memo to Plush’s chief accountant indicating the tests used in determining whether goodwill has been impaired. Include in your discussion one or more possible conditions under which Plush might be required to recognize impairment of goodwill on its investment in Common Corporation.In preparing your memo, review the current accounting literature, including authoritative pronouncements of the FASB and other appropriate bodies. Support your discussion with citations and quotations from the applicable literature.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Please refer the detail answer in the memo below

Explanation:

Date: 24 January 20XX

Subject: Review of Impairment of Goodwill

From: External Auditors

To: Chief Accountant, Plush Corporation

Upon review of the investment made by your company in Common Corporation, we believe that there are possible indications of the impairment of the goodwill initially recognized in the books upon acquisition.

At the time of Acquisition:

Consideration = $450,000

Fair Value of Net Assets = $430,000

Goodwill = $450,000 - $430,000 = $20,000

The new guidance issued by FASB, requires only a one-step quantitative impairment test, whereby a goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value.

However, if we follow the previous guidance of FASB, we have to test the impairment with the following three steps:

Step 1: We will compare the carrying amount of the net assets with the Fair value of Reporting Unit, and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, we will record the impairment.

Step 1: We will compute, implied value of goodwill by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with the fair value of the identifiable net assets, if FV of net assets are higher, then there is no impairment, otherwise we will jump to Step 3.

Step 3: If the calculated implied value of the goodwill is lower than the actual goodwill at acquisition, than the difference is the impairment loss, however in case the implied value of the goodwill is higher than the actual goodwill at acquisition, no impairment shall be recorded.

Apparently, since the fair value of Common had increased to $485,000, there is no need to recognize the impairment loss on goodwill; however we believe that the estimated fair value of Common is less than the $430,000 and therefore impairment should be recorded.


Related Questions

who bears the greatest risk of loss of value if a firm should fail? group of answer choices bondholders common stockholders all of the above bear equal risk of loss. preferred stockholders
Wellington Recycling recycles newsprint, cardboard, and so forth, into received packaging materials. For the coming year, Wellington estimates total manufacturing overhead to be $359,640. The managers are not sure if direct labor hours (estimated to be 9,990) or machine hours (estimated to be 7,982 hours) is the best allocation base to use for allocating manufacturing overhead. Wellington bids for jobs a 31 % markup over total manufacturing cost.After the new fiscal year began, Hollings Paper Supply asked Wellington Recycling to bid for a job that will take 1 ,975 machine hours and t ,700 direct labor hours to produce. The direct labor cost this will be $10 per hour, and the direct materials will total S25,500. Required: Compute the total job cost and price if Wellington decided to use direct labor hours as the manufacturing overhead allocation base for the year.
A category of assets that typically has zero in the Free Assets column in a Statement of Affairs is:
A department adds all raw materials to a process at the beginning of the process and incurs conversion costs uniformly throughout the process. For the month of January, there were no units in the beginning work in process inventory; 91300 units were started into production in January; and there were 20900 units that were 40% complete in the ending work in process inventory at the end of January. What were the equivalent units of production for conversion costs for the month of January?
Buerhle Company needs to determine if its indefinite-life intangibles other than goodwill have been impaired and should be reduced or written off on its balance sheet. The impairment test(s) to be used is (are) ______________. A. Both recoverability test and fair value test B. Recoverability test but not fair value test C. Not recoverability test but fair value test D. Neither recoverability test nor fair value test

Suppose Rita obtains 10 units of utility from the last dollar of income she receives and David obtains 6 units of utility from his last dollar of income. Assume both David and Rita have the same capacity to derive utility from income with identical marginal-utility-of-income-curves. Those who favor an equal distribution of income would____________.a. advocate redistributing income from David to Rita.b. advocate redistributing income from Rita to David.c. be content with this distribution of income between Rita and David.d. argue that any redistribution of income between them would increase total utility.

Answers

Answer:

a. advocate redistributing income from David to Rita.

Explanation:

Since David is getting a lower utility from his last dollar obtained (6) than Rita (10), the benefit that David gains from this last dollar is less than what Rita would gain if she was the one receiving this dollar. Therefore, those who favor an equal distribution of income would advocate redistributing income from David to Rita, since total utility would increase with this redistribution.

What are the products of an effectively performed job analysis?

Answers

Answer:

The explanation including its single issue is outlined in the section below on theories.

Explanation:

Analysis of work environment or profession is also widely recognized as the analysis of jobs. That would be the first starting point throughout the staffing process.

It describes items as follows:

  • The work to be completed.
  • Performance predicted.
  • The instruments and procedures involved.
  • Working or Workplace conditions, including due salaries.

Kroger, a grocery store chain, sells thousands of products from hundreds ofdifferent producers that are shipped through a variety of shipping companies
and stored at various warehouses facilities. The coordinated efforts with each
channel partner at each touch point takes efficiency and communication. In
order for the process to run smoothly, which three functions do channel
partners need to perform to efficiently flow products and titles to the
consumer to get payments back to producers?
O transactional, logistical, and facilitating functions
o facilitating, commercial, and institutional functions
logistical, commercial, and transactional functions

Answers

Answer:

transactional, logistical, and facilitating functions

Explanation:

Suppose that Italy and Austria both produce fish and shoes. Italy’s opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 5 pounds of fish, while Austria’s opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 10 pounds of fish. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing shoes in the two countries, you can tell that _____ has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes, and ______ has a comparative advantage in the production of fish.

Suppose that Italy and Austria consider trading shoes and fish with each other. Italy can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than _______ of fish for each pair of shoes it exports to Austria. Similarly, Austria can gain from trade as long as it receives more than _______ of shoes for each pound of fish it exports to Italy.

Based on your answers to the previous question, which of the following terms of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of fish) would allow both Austria and Italy to gain from trade? Check all that apply.

(A) 8 pounds of fish per pair of shoes
(B) 1 pound of fish per pair of shoes
(C) 15 pounds of fish per pair of shoes
(D) 3 pounds of fish per pair of shoes

Answers

Answer:

Section 1..... Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes, and Austria has a comparative advantage in the production of fish.

Section 2.... 5 pounds of fish, ; 1/10 pairs of shoes

Section 3..... A and C.

Explanation:

The comparative advantage is known to be a term that is in use in the economic world,where a country or company has the ability of producing goods at extremely lower cost compared to that of its partners or competitors.

This is very important because, the country or company will be able to produce its goods by making use of fewer resources.

And thereby gives the country or company an edge in selling its goods at a reasonable lower price when compared with that of its competitors.

In this case, it is summarized or concluded that, Italy has a lower opportunity cost of producing shoes. So, Italy has a comparative advantage in shoes and Sweden has a comparative advantage in fish.

The company’s president has asked the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) to record an additional $75,000 of revenue at the end of the year without providing supporting documentation. What is the most ethical thing to do?

Answers

Answer:

It is unethical for the CFO to record the additional $75,000 without receipts and supporting documents

Explanation:

The company balance sheet needs to reflect the true financial position of the firm, hence the right thing to do is to ask for documentation and receipts before recording the additional $ 75,000.

Two firms, A and B, each currently dump 50 tonnes of chemicals into the local river. From now on both firms will require a pollution permit for each tonne of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives each firm 20 tonnes’ worth of pollution permits, which it can either use or sell to the other firm. It costs Firm A $100 for each tonne of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river, and it costs Firm B $50 for each tonne of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river. What is likely to happen?

Answers

Answer:

10 fewer tons of pollution into the river and Firm B will dump 50 fewer tons of pollution into the river.

Explanation:

Firm B will SELL ALL of its allotted 20 permits, and clean up all of its 50 units of pollution. The price per permit will be above $50 each. Firm A will BUY ALL 20 of B's permits. It will then dump 40 tons into the water, and will clean up its remaining 10. The price it pays for a permit will be under $100.

Answer:

Firm B will sell all its permits to Firm A  i.e ( lesser chemical dumps into the river )

Explanation:

Firm B will rather sell all its 20 tonnes worth of pollution permit to firm A because it would cause Firm B lesser than Firm A when they dispose off their wastes before it gets to the River hence they will rather dispose off their waste rather than paying/purchasing pollution permits while

Firm A will buy out all of Firm B's allotted pollution permits to reduce the number of tonnes they would dispose off before getting to the river. this is because it would cause them more when they dispose off their waste before getting it to the river. hence the End product of the whole arrangement will be  Chemical dumps into the River will be reduced drastically to 40 overall instead of 100 due to the cost of dumping permits.

Other Questions