Answer&Explanation:
The relationship is that a langauge always reflects where someone comes from , the way they pronounce certain words , some langauge is learned through certain beliefs that each culture has for example a person who is from Africa and a person who is from America will pronounce words differently or even speak the same langauge differently because all the words that they speak have been influenced by their background and upbringing.
A person's language comes majorly from his/her history, beliefs, values, background and environment. For example, if a person is born in America, the culture, background, beliefs he/she is exposed to is of America, so the human mind adopts the same and then the english language is also adopted by the person as that is prevalent in the background of the country.
The basis of any person's language is the culture, belief and background he/she comes from. For example, in India, there are multiple cultures, beliefs and chunk of people have different backgrounds and history. On the basis of these there are different languages in the country. People have different slangs and different way of saying the same thing in their own language. The culture, belief, background, values and the environment around a person makes the language of a person.
Answer:
The correct answer is - rewards.
Explanation:
The rewards or benefits of a relationship are those things that we see as positive such as desirable personality traits. In this case, the encoraging nature of Cassie is a reward, and similarly for Cassie, Danielle always helpful so for the Danielle so the reward is the reason they most likely friends for.
Thus, the correct answer is - reward.
The most likely reason Danielle and Cassie are friends is because Cassie provides positive encouragement and mutually beneficial help to Danielle, which are essential components in friendship formation.
The most likely reason Danielle and Cassie are friends is due to their positive interactions and mutual benefits. Cassie encourages Danielle, which uplifts her and fosters a positive environment. In return, Cassie helps Danielle with her yard work, hence showing beneficial reciprocation. In friendships, people often gravitate towards those who make them feel good about themselves and offer a balance of give-and-take. These aspects strengthen their bond and make their friendship more likely.
This relates to the concept of how proximity, similarities, reciprocal liking, and shared interests can influence the formation of friendships, as shown in Sam's case, who after moving to a new apartment building, is most likely to become friends with those he interacts with the most on a daily basis, or has shared interests with.
#SPJ11
Answer:
A coffin ship was any of the ships that carried Irish immigrants escaping the Great Irish Famine and Highlanders displaced by the Highland Clearances.
Explanation:
Congress
House of Representatives
• Lower chamber
• 435 representatives
?
• Upper chamber
100 representatives
Help me please hurry
Senate best completes the diagram showing the structure of the legislative branch of the U.S. government. Thus, option C is the correct option.
The House of Representatives and the Senate, which together make up the United States Congress, comprise the Legislative Branch, which was established by Article I of the Constitution. According to the Constitution, only Congress has the ability to pass laws and declare war, approve or reject numerous presidential nominations, and conduct extensive investigations.
There are 435 elected members of the House of Representatives, who are distributed among the 50 states in proportion to their populations. The District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and four additional American territories—American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Vir/gin Islands, and the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands—are represented by the six non-voting members who make up the body. The Speaker of the House serves as the chamber's presider, elected by the Representatives.
Learn more about the US legislative branch here:
#SPJ7
Answer:
Senate
Explanation:
Have a good day!
Answer:
Negligent hiring
Explanation:
A school hired a bus driver without conducting a multistate criminal background check; the school conducted a background check only in the state in which it is located. Subsequently, the driver was convicted of kidnapping one of the children who traveled in his bus. The prosecution in the case revealed that the driver had been convicted 10 years ago for a similar case in another state. In this scenario, the school is guilty of negligent hiring
Negligent hiring is a legal claim made against an employer which is based on the fact that the employer knew or should have known about the employee's background i.e,the employer should have known about the employee's background of violent behavior.In this scenario, the school is guilty of negligent hiring because they fail to do a proper criminal background check on potential employees and also check employment and personal references of the driver in order to validate his employment history
In interpreting a dream, a psychoanalyst would attempt to discover the dream's latent content.
A criticism of interest group pluralism is "its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources".
One of the criticisms of interest group pluralism centers around imbalances that may hold on, in this way discoloring popularity based goals.
Ideally, interest group pluralism alludes to the conflicting interest groups that work with the administration to make a social and law based parity for all. Be that as it may, interest group pluralism, as rehearsed, moves toward becoming discolored with cash and power. On the off chance that one gathering is favored among another gathering, the parity shifts. This can happen regularly with cash. On the off chance that the administration favors one gathering over another as a result of powers of cash or power, vote based system can come into inquiry. In this manner, there turns into a disparity in the portrayal of society overall. The incredible interest group can pressure the administration, and the legislature may start to settle on choices that don't support an equalization of sentiments and thoughts.
One criticism of interest group pluralism is its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources.
This critique suggests that interest groups with more money and resources have a greater ability to shape policy outcomes, potentially marginalizing the interests of less affluent individuals or groups. Critics argue that this creates an imbalance in the democratic process, as the influence of wealth can overshadow the voices of those with limited financial means.
Another criticism is that interest group pluralism favors the interests of large states over those of small states. This concern arises from the notion that interest groups with a larger membership or more resources may have a stronger impact on policymaking, potentially leaving the concerns and needs of smaller states underrepresented.
However, it is important to note that these criticisms do not reflect the views of all individuals or scholars, and there are varying perspectives on the impact and implications of interest group pluralism in democratic societies. The nature and effects of interest group influence can vary across different contexts, and debates continue about how best to balance the representation of diverse interests within democratic system
To know more about interest here
#SPJ6