Answer:B
Explanation:
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
Read this paragraph:
According to London School of Economics, kids get better test scores when devices are banned from school. Researchers Richard Murphy and Louis-Philippe Beland say, "We found the impact of banning phones for these students equivalent to an additional hour a week in school, or to increasing the school year by five days.” The schools' test scores improved by 6.4%. The impact on underachieving students was much more significant and their average test scores rose by 14%. This shows, students not having cell phones in the class room makes students pay attention, not get distracted, and get better grades.
What would be a good counter claim for this paragraph?
The squirrel twitched it's tail back and forth.
B.
Their's is the one on the right, under the box.
C.
Stanley claimed that the papers were his'.
D.
Have you seen the cat and its kittens?
predicate noun
direct object
predicate adjective
subject
indirect object
predicate
Subject would be the correct answer! :)
Answer:
It would be subject!
Explanation:
A.
false analogy
B.
red herring
C.
bandwagon
D.
fallacy of argument from ignorance
The type of special appeal the argument demonstrates is a): false analogy.
A false analogy is an informal fallacy, it applies to inductive arguments, like the one in this excerpt. It is an informal fallacy because the error is about what the argument is about, and not the argument itself.
The argument given by the opponent is a valid argument, but it is wrong in the context since the debate is focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, not on every action that causes driving accidents. It would be valid in other debate, but not in this one, although the subject "driving accidents" is common on both.