When Smirnov thanks Popova for her last word he is using ________.The Bear by Anton Chekov
A. Irony
B. Dramatic irony
C. Situational irony
D. Verbal irony

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:B

Explanation:

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

its c

Explanation:


Related Questions

I dont get analogies
What theme is common to the two excerpts below? 1.. . . His theory of running until he reached camp and the boys had one flaw in it: he lacked the endurance. Several times he stumbled, and finally he tottered, crumpled up, and fell. When he tried to rise, he failed. He must sit and rest, he decided, and next time he would merely walk and keep on going. As he sat and regained his breath, he noted that he was feeling quite warm and comfortable. He was not shivering, and it even seemed that a warm glow had come to his chest and trunk. And yet, when he touched his nose or cheeks, there was no sensation. Running would not thaw them out. Nor would it thaw out his hands and feet. Then the thought came to him that the frozen portions of his body must be extending. He tried to keep this thought down, to forget it, to think of something else; he was aware of the panicky feeling that it caused, and he was afraid of the panic. But the thought asserted itself, and persisted, until it produced a vision of his body totally frozen.(Jack London, To Build a Fire)2.Presently the boat also passed to the left of the correspondent with the captain clinging with one hand to the keel. He would have appeared like a man raising himself to look over a board fence, if it were not for the extraordinary gymnastics of the boat. The correspondent marvelled that the captain could still hold to it.They passed on, nearer to shore—the oiler, the cook, the captain—and following them went the water-jar, bouncing gayly over the seas.The correspondent remained in the grip of this strange new enemy—a current. The shore, with its white slope of sand and its green bluff, topped with little silent cottages, was spread like a picture before him. It was very near to him then, but he was impressed as one who in a gallery looks at a scene from Brittany or Algiers.He thought: "I am going to drown? Can it be possible? Can it be possible? Can it be possible?" Perhaps an individual must consider his own death to be the final phenomenon of nature."(Stephen Crane, The Open Boat)mysteries of life and deathfinding hope after tragedyhumanity's helplessness against naturefinding inner strengthchoosing between security and individualism
How many times can 3 go into 8
In London, Shakespeare was making his mark as an_____ and a writer.
Which is a sentence fragment? A.She asked me to, so I did.B.We bought milk, bread, and eggs.C.A pencil, four sheets of paper, and a ruler.D.This morning the sunrise was spectacular.Which is a sentence fragment? A.She asked me to, so I did.B.We bought milk, bread, and eggs.C.A pencil, four sheets of paper, and a ruler.D.This morning the sunrise was spectacular.

Can anyone help? I m not sure if my answer is right

Answers

Maybe... Or maybe the third one down - 'an encouraging tone'
No, you're right. :)

PLZ HELP FIRST ONE BRAINLIEST + 5 STARS ALSO 3-4 SENTENCES

Read this paragraph:

According to London School of Economics, kids get better test scores when devices are banned from school. Researchers Richard Murphy and Louis-Philippe Beland say, "We found the impact of banning phones for these students equivalent to an additional hour a week in school, or to increasing the school year by five days.” The schools' test scores improved by 6.4%. The impact on underachieving students was much more significant and their average test scores rose by 14%. This shows, students not having cell phones in the class room makes students pay attention, not get distracted, and get better grades.

What would be a good counter claim for this paragraph?

Answers

Devices also allow kids to easily access education material, which could be beneficial to them in the long term learning process. This is 2018, no child should have to walk to a library for God’s sake. (I do lol)

Which sentence uses possessive personal pronouns correctly? A.
The squirrel twitched it's tail back and forth.


B.
Their's is the one on the right, under the box.


C.
Stanley claimed that the papers were his'.


D.
Have you seen the cat and its kittens?

Answers

the only correct sentence from those you've provided is "their's is the one on the right, under the box" because it's the only sentence using the possesive form correctly.

first sentence -> it's = it is ; its is the possesive

third sentecne -> his' does not exist

fourth sentence -> no possesive form is used at all.

Which word in the sentence is the indirect object? My uncle handed me a box filled with old photographs. A. me B. box C. handed D. uncle

Answers

I believe the answer is A. me because you are receiving the direct object

Identify the italicized part of the sentence.The capital of Texas is Austin.

predicate noun
direct object
predicate adjective
subject
indirect object
predicate

Answers

Subject would be the correct answer! :)

Answer:

It would be subject!

Explanation:

In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. Which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “My opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. Many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. Yes, we have statistics to support that. However, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents!”

A.
false analogy
B.
red herring
C.
bandwagon
D.
fallacy of argument from ignorance

Answers

The type of special appeal the argument demonstrates is a): false analogy.

A false analogy is an informal fallacy, it applies to inductive arguments, like the one in this excerpt. It is an informal fallacy because the error is about what the argument is about, and not the argument itself.

The argument given by the opponent is a valid argument, but it is wrong in the context since the debate is focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, not on every action that causes driving accidents. It would be valid in other debate, but not in this one, although the subject "driving accidents" is common on both.