Agreement and disagreement among economists Suppose that Edison, an economist from an AM talk radio program, and Hilary, an economist from a university in Massachusetts, are arguing over saving incentives. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: Hilary: I think it's safe to say that, in general, the savings rate of households in today's economy is much lower than it really needs to be to sustain an improvement in living standards.
Edison: I think a switch from the income tax to a consumption tax would bring growth in living standards.
Hilary: You really think households would change their saving behavior enough in response to this to make a difference? Because I don't.

The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to ______.

(A) differences in values
(B) differences in perception versus reality
(C) differences in scientific judgments

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: The difference between the two economist are "differences in perception versus reality". That means option B is most correct.

Explanation: The difference in their perception versus reality, means how their want to interpret things against how things really are.

Harry interpret his understanding, that the way people save their house hold is becoming lower than what it use to be, to improve the standard of living. Though he doesn't believe consumption of household product is the factor to be controlled to achieve an improvement in the standard of living. While Edison interprets his that, if tax is applied more in consumption, it will help reduce the rate of consumption of households products, which will help them to save more, thereby increasing their standard of living.

Harry views household consumption as a real factor of standard of living that has been affected due to a cause. While Edison views household consumption as the real cause, which has to be worked on, to achieve a growth in standard of living.


Related Questions

In interpreting a dream, a psychoanalyst would attempt to discover the dream's _______________. manifest content symbolic content psychological content latent content
Carefully read the Evaluation of Arguments" section of the instructions before answering questions Is the Argument Strong or Weak? Question: Should the United States Department of Defense keep the public informed of its anticipated scientific research programs by publicizing ahead of time the needs that would be served by each program? Argument: No; some become critical of the government when widely publicized projects turn out unsuccessfully. Question: Should the United States Department of Defense keep the public informed of its anticipated scientific research programs by publicizing ahead of time the needs that would be served by each program? Argument: Yes; only a public so informed will support vital research and development activities with its tax dollars. Question: Should the United States Department of Defense keep the public informed of its anticipated scientific research programs by publicizing ahead of time the needs that would be served by each program? Argument: No; it is essential to keep certain military developments secret for national security and defense reasons. Question: Do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor? Argument: No; because rich people are more likely to settle their cases out of court. Question: Do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor? Argument: No; most jurors are more sympathetic to poor people than to the rich, and the jurors' sympathies affect their findings.
An import is a good that isA. brought into a country.B. cheap to produce.C. shipped to overseas markets.D. made only in one place.
Who is the first president of Nepal?​
What issue did the Three Fifths Compromise address?

How does the creation of the Department of Homeland Security affect resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations? Are there too few resources to fight both terrorists and traditional criminals? Who should pay the burden for investigating, apprehending, prosecuting, convicting, sentencing, and incarcerating terrorists? Should Osama Bin Laden have been taken alive? What are the due process protection questions in light of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security? Should these due process protections matter in the fight against terrorism?

Answers

Answer:

Throughout the settings page beneath, the definition including its represents the path is defined.

Explanation:

(1)

  • DHS becomes willing to take responsibility for counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, airport security, security policies, international security, management and compliance of certain immigration laws, the safety of our heads of government, vital infrastructure safety underneath the direction of the President, the United states department of defense seems to be the U.S. Federal Administrative Agency resp.
  • "The justice department must have been established after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, 2001, which slaughtered a" maximum of 2,977 civilians in New York City, from defending the President but stemming the influx of drugs across the border to stopping acts of violence but instead supporting neighborhoods recovering from natural calamities, all aspects of DHS become united throughout their attempt to promote the Homeland Security project. Including anywhere outside the villa in Shanks, Pennsylvania.

(2)

  • The U.S and the world organizations employ both military force and criminal enforcement devices during counterterrorism to work out their freedom of self-defense including, if conditions permit, to put the profession into disrepute. The latter aim seems to have been responsible for creating the multinational counter-terrorism alliance.
  • If captured, suspected terrorists could not be given concentration camp status, while formally recognized organized Taliban groups in Afghanistan would possibly apply for prison camp conditions.

(3)

  • The idea of violence as something of a means of political action originally came throughout the terror including its French Revolution, while the terrors of warfare but also criminal activity were already recognized since the beginning of human life.
  • By some of the end of the 19th century, "terrorism" applied almost entirely to something like the antigovernment brutality of organizations such as that of the Russian Narodnaya Volya, originally a term for both the barbaric abuses of power of a communist government. Since then, national expectations and priorities have differed in the classification of individual individuals and acts as terrorists.

(4)

Whether he is captured and tortured or becomes a live Muslim martyr, a sure kill towards him eventually getting out.

(5)

The due process seems to be the fundamental obligation that almost all of the fundamental rights granted to an individual must be upheld either by state. It safeguards and defends the private citizen from the force of the rule of the country.

Due process has often been viewed as prohibiting legislation as well as judicial prosecutions.

Final answer:

The Department of Homeland Security's creation strained resources for local crime-fighting but is vital in balancing threats. Investigations of high-profile terrorists like Osama Bin Laden involve many considerations. Lastly, due process protections are contentious in counter-terrorism efforts but are vital to uphold in the fight against terrorism.

Explanation:

The creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) affected resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations since a portion of funding had to be redirected toward combating terrorism. It's a balancing act to allocate resources between fighting terrorism and handling traditional crimes. Although it may strain resources, it is crucial to prioritize both. The federal government, through entities like the FBI and the DHS, typically bears the responsibility of investigating, apprehending, and prosecuting terrorists.

Concerning individuals such as Osama Bin Laden, decisions about their capture are complex and must take into account various elements like potential intelligence value, the risk to US forces, and international laws.

The creation of DHS raised due process protection questions because of the expanded powers it has to investigate and detain suspects of terrorism. Regardless of the severity of the crime, protecting due process rights is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. legal system. These protections should not be negated in the fight against terrorism; maintaining our principles is part of the fight against terrorism.

Learn more about Impact of Department of Homeland Security here:

brainly.com/question/32446016

#SPJ3

How does it feel to learn that God knows us?​

Answers

It feels amazing he created us so he knows us in and out

Answer:

Strange

Explanation:

Its weird "knowing" that this potentially fictional character knows us. its so mindbogglingly to me that this God knows everything about me, yet I seem to not know everything about my self.  

Nina and Mitch, a cohabiting couple, have been deeply attracted to each other since their college years. This gives them both a deep and fulfilling sense of sexual well-being. After graduating from college, Nina has been able to find a good deal for an apartment for them, and have agreed to share the rent. Seeing that they are extremely cooperative and committed to each other, Mitch has come to believe that the thread that binds them together is sacred. The deep desire for each other and the sexual fulfillment in the relationship between Nina and Mitch points to which characteristic of commitment?

a) Sexual well-being
b) Attraction
c) Serial monogamy
d) Moral-normative perception
e) External constraints

Answers

Answer:

b) Attraction

Explanation:

The deep desire for each other and the sexual fulfillment in the relationship between Nina and Mitch point to both an emotional and physical attraction for each other. Furthermore, it points out that this attraction is being met, leaving both satisfied with the relationship that is being established.

Final answer:

The deep sense of commitment between Nina and Mitch is best characterized by moral-normative perception. Mitch regards their relationship as 'sacred,' reflecting an obligation based on personal beliefs and moral values, which represents the essence of moral-normative perception.

Explanation:

The commitment between Nina and Mitch, as depicted in the question, is best characterized by d) Moral-normative perception. While sexual well-being and attraction are crucial to their relationship, the question points out a deeper, more profound level of commitment. Moral-normative perception refers to the sense of obligation or duty to continue a relationship based on personal beliefs, moral values, or societal norms.

In this case, Mitch regards their relationship as 'sacred,' indicating a commitment that transcends physical attraction or convenience. This suggests a moral-normative viewpoint, as it encompasses the belief in the sanctity and importance of their partnership. Despite attraction and sexual well-being being parts of their relationship, the moral-normative perception is what defines their commitment.

Learn more about Moral-normative perception here:

brainly.com/question/32472150

#SPJ3

How do we use fossil fuels to heat buildings

Answers

Answer:

Furnances

Explanation:

Fossil fuels can be use to heat building by burning coals or woods in the furnance which will provide heat all over the building

How is water important to you?

Answers

Answer:

survival

Explanation:

we need it to live

Answer:

They keep us hydrated and alive.

Explanation:

after going inside for a midnight snack, you and your firends go back outdoors for a 25 minute sky gazing session. the probability that you observe no more than 52 meteors during this sky gazing session is

Answers

Answer:

1

Explanation:

According to Google, daily there are 17 meteors hit the Earth on average. In 25 minutes, there are almost no chance you and your friends can observe 52 meteors. Therefore, the probability is 1 (or 100%).

Answer:

your answer it 1

Explanation: