Answer:
Explanation: Reflexivity is the process by which the researcher reflects upon the data collection and interpretation process while white coat effect is defined as the transient elevation of office blood pressure induced by the alerting response to a doctor or a nurse. WCE can occur in both normotensive and hypertensive persons; and is not substantially influenced by reassurance and familiarisation. They are both important
Reflexivity is important in qualitative research because there are so many ways in which researcher bias could affect a study which starts from the creation of data, gathering of data, collection of the data, analysing and reporting the outcome.
Answer:
• difference between white coat effects and reflexivity in social research is;
White Coat Effect is the effects that researchers have on the very processes and relationships they are studying by virture of just being there.
Reflexivity in social research is the analyzing and critically considering our own role in, and the effect on, our research.
• important of white coat effect;
It helps employee in the organization to conform with the organization's policy.
• important of reflexivity;
Reflexivity is as an approach that promotes critical awareness of how knowledge is created.
Answer: Automation
Explanation: Automation is the act or process of converting the controlling of a machine or device to a more automatic system such as computer or electronic controls. An increase in home automation allows many household activities to be automated or controlled from a distance i.e. without external control or intervention.
Such activities would include: scheduling of tasks for example watering the garden, accessing surveillance cameras within and outside the house, opening doors, windows etc.
Answer:
Self-injury
Explanation:
Self-injury usually occurs when people face what seem like overwhelming or distressing feelings. It can also be an act of rebellion and/or rejection of parents' values and a way of individualizing oneself. Sufferers may feel that self-injury is a way of: Temporarily relieving intense feelings, pressure, or anxiety, Being a means to control and manage pain - unlike the pain experienced through physical or sexual abuse or trauma., Providing a way to break through emotional numbness (the self-anesthesia that allows someone to cut without feeling pain), Asking for help in an indirect way or drawing attention to the need for help, Attempting to affect others by manipulating them, trying to make them care, trying to make them feel guilty, or trying to make them go away
Self-injury also may be a reflection of a person's self-hatred. Some self-injurers are punishing themselves for having strong feelings that they were usually not allowed to express as children. They also may be punishing themselves for somehow being bad and undeserving. These feelings are an outgrowth of abuse and a belief that the abuse was deserved.
"A former slave, Sojourner Truth became an outspoken advocate for abolition, temperance, and civil and women's rights in the nineteenth century. Her Civil War work earned her an invitation to meet President Abraham Lincoln in 1864"
Answer:
Sojourner truth is a negroe that was a slave and she made the book "ain't i woman". Her kids have been sent off to other plantations and she heard about other female and what they get.
Explanation:
2. Given this evidence, the researcher should reject the null hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
3. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information . . .
4. Given this evidence, the researchers should reject the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
Answer:
1. False
2.True
3.True
4.false
Explanation:
Given that the difference surpasses the threshold level it means the experiment is highly significant according to statistics a p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) is statistically significant.
This shows that the null hypothesis is less than a 5% probability correct and the alternative is more than 95% correct.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis as the correct hypothesis
B. Participants are not exposed to the independent variable (IV).
C. Participants are exposed to the independent variable (IV).
D. Participants are hand-selected based on attributes that would disqualify them from the group.
Answer:
The correct answer is : option C. Participants are exposed to the independent variable (IV)
Explanation:
The control group is a group in a experimental setting that does not receive treatment or does not exposed to the any influence in a research by scientists and provide standers result that can be use for comparison or benchmark to the the subjects do in absence of influence.
Unlike the experimental group, is get the treatment by the researcher, the control group is not in influence or does not exposed to the independent variable under scientific research or experiment.
Thus, the correct answer is : option C. Participants are exposed to the independent variable (IV)
The correct answer is B. Participants in the control group are not exposed to the independent variable (IV) in a research study.
In a research study, the control group serves as a comparison group against the experimental group. The control group is not exposed to the independent variable (IV), which is the variable being tested in the study. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
#SPJ3
Chris McCandless is the main character of the book Into the Wild by John Krakauer.
In this book, we learn that McCandless is the product of his father's second marriage. However, McCandless also learns that his father had not yet divorced his first wife when McCandless and his sister were born. Therefore, the father led a double life. This realization profoundly affected McCandless. This knowledge made him felt betrayed and angry. To some extent, this sense of betrayal and anger explains why the choices in life of McCandless are so different from the choices his parents wanted him to make.