Who led the argument before the supreme court in the brown v. Board of education case and later became a supreme court justice?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

Thurgood Marshall.

Explanation:

Thurgood Marshall was the first Supreme Court justice of African descend. He was a lawyer by profession and played an important role in bringing racial equality and liberty during the Civil Rights Movement.

Marshall became a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and it was during this time he served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. He successfully led the case and won a unanimous verdict against school segregation.

This case helped him gain lots of recognition and admiration. President Johnson appointed him as the first African-American Supreme Court justice in 1967.

Answer 2

Answer:

Answer:

Thurgood Marshall

Explanation:

I took the test

Related Questions

If the police arrive at Larrys office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, which amendment protects him from this type of search?
If you are caught speeding in a school or construction zone your fine could
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
What are the benefits and drawbacks of selecting judges through popular elections? Can a judge who considers herself or himself a Republican or a Democrat render fair and impartial justice?
As you approach an intersection blanks around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection

How has the supreme court’s original interpretation of the right to privacy changed because of griswold and roe?

Answers

Answer:

Hi im Sergeant von im here too help!!.The Supreme Court's original interpretation of the right to privacy has changed because of Griswold and Roe by increasing and expanding the right to privacy. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life. Hope this answer helps.

Answer: This was the sample response

The Supreme Court has increased or expanded the right to privacy. Originally, the right applied to the privacy of one's own thoughts and the freedom to be left alone. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life.

Explanation:

Which branch of government decides if a law violates the constitution?

Answers

The branch of government that decides if a law violates the Constitution is the Judicial branch. The Judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, has the power of judicial review, which allows it to determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. If the Supreme Court finds that a law violates the Constitution, it can declare the law unconstitutional and render it invalid.

The judicial branch is that branch of the governmentthat interprets the law, settles disputes and administers justice to all citizens. The judicial branch is considered the watchdog of democracy, and also the guardian of the Constitution. The judicial branch has the authority to render a law invalid if the law seems to violate the constitution.

To learn more about "Branch of the government" visit: brainly.com/question/8480333

#SPJ11

Answer: The correct answer is the Judicial Branch.

Explanation:

The Judicial branch of the government decides whether laws are unconstitutional, among other things.

Dr. Jones has a client who is of a different culture and faith. He is not comfortable dealing with this patient due to past negative feelings from childhood. What are his ethical and legal obligations? Why are these legal and ethical obligations in place?

Answers

Dr. Jones has both ethical and legal obligations when it comes to treating patients from different cultures and faiths. From an ethical standpoint, it is his duty to provide quality care to all patients, regardless of their background, and to respect their beliefs and values. He must ensure that his personal biases do not interfere with the care he provides.

From a legal perspective, Dr. Jones must adhere to laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, and culture. It is also essential for him to comply with patient privacy laws, ensuring that the patient's personal and medical information remains confidential.

These legal and ethical obligations are in place to ensure that all patients receive fair and equitable treatment regardless of their cultural or religious background. Discrimination can lead to substandard care and can have a negative impact on the patient's physical and emotional health. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals to understand and respect the diverse backgrounds of their patients to provide them with the best possible care.

To know more about cultures click this link-

brainly.com/question/30447976

#SPJ11

What is needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by shelly and tony?

Answers

COMPLETE QUESTION:

Which of the following is needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by Shelly and Tony?

a. That Mrs. Vogel made a false statement of a fact.

b. That Mrs. Vogel harmed the reputation of the car dealership.

c. That the statement was published to at least one person, other than those who worked at the car dealership.

d. All of these choices are needed.

Answer: d.) All of these choices are needed.

Explanation:

Culled from Constitutional Issues:

All of the stated options or are needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by Shelly and Tony. Hence, the correct answer is (d.)

who wrote: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” ?

Answers

It was Madison who wrote that

It was Maddison who answer

HELP ASAP!!!!! LIMITED TIME TEST!!!! COLLEGEColleges will sometimes include Expected Student Contributions in
their financial aid packages. This is a sample aid estimate from
Stanford University. How much is Stanford asking this student to
contribute toward their education by working a job during the
academic year?

Select one:

47, 331

5,568

2, 200

Answers

Answer: 5,568

Explanation:

Based on the given options, the answer is:

5,568

Other Questions

Your own thoughts about criminal justice system?

Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror. True or False

Teachers of young children have nothing in common with teachers of elementary and high school students. True or false

Project: Lulu the Runaway DogProject Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you. As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch. Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!" But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess? You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them. Marjorie's Questions: Who was involved in the accident? Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals? Which duties did you breach? Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both? For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they? Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer. Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire. To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire. The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire. You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case. Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below. Don the maintenance worker Cassie the camper Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee Pete the landowner Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.