Answer: Logical evidence
Explanation:
This whole section is very straightforward. There are a lot of statistics, numbers, and facts for the American people.
Thus, it can't be emotional evidence.
To continue, its not discussing ethics (people's behavior). It's just assigning funds to American families.
So, it has to be logical evidence, which makes sense because FDR describes the condition of the US and the moves he has to take to make sure that the country doesn't end up in economic difficulty.
Answer:
Now to cover the principles of the share-our-wealth society, I give them in order:
1. To limit poverty:
We propose that a deserving family shall share in our wealth of America at least for one third the average. An average family is slightly less than five persons. The number has become less during depression. The United States total wealth in normal times is about $400 billion or about $15,000 to a family. If there were fair distribution of our things in America, our national wealth would be three or four or five times the $400 billion, because a free, circulating wealth is worth many times more than wealth congested and frozen into a few hands as is America's wealth. But, figuring only on the basis of wealth as valued when frozen into a few hands, there is the average of $15,000 to the family. We say that we will limit poverty of the deserving people. One third of the average wealth to the family, or $5,000, is a fair limit to the depths we will allow any one man's family to fall. None too poor, none too rich.
–Huey Long,
February 5, 1934
Why does Long believe that distributing about $15,000 to each US family would increase the nation’s wealth to more than $400 billion?
It would create hope for the lower classes and inspire them to work harder.
It would make things more even for all Americans.
It would limit the depths of poverty that anyone can sink into.
It would increase cash circulation in the market because more people would be spending.
Explanation:
what is the answer? pls never mind the answer was d
Answer:
u r right
Explanation:
b. while facts do not pertain to history, historical fiction is based on historical events.
c. while facts usually tell about discoveries, historical fiction often includes details about the weather and setting.
D. while facts can be proven, historical fiction includes imagined details to add dramatic interest
“Never shall I forget those flames that consumed my faith forever.”
“A dozen or so Gypsies had come to join our guard.”
“I thought: This is what the antechamber of hell must look like.”
“Freed from the barbers’ clutches, we began to wander about the crowd
Answer:
The correct answer is “Never shall I forget those flames that consumed my faith forever.”
Explanation:
This excerpt comes from Elie Wiesel's Night book. Here he relates the horrors experienced during the holocaust. "Never shall I forget those flames that consumed my faith forever" speaks of the flames where the Jews were cremated and that is exactly what made him lose faith.
He lost that faith not only in himself, but also in humanity, because it is inconceivable that there have been people who could do these atrocities against other people just for having a different religion.
Given this information we can say that the correct answer is Never shall I forget those flames that consumed my faith forever.