Which idea from this excerpt further complicates matters conflict

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Option D. The fact that the coach does not support Neto, Jesse and the other teammate complicates even further Neto's conflict.

Explanation:


Related Questions

What is one way to make the introduction interesting to the reader?​
Whet is his (her,their) job?
Please use execute in a SHORT AND EASY sentencelike even elementary kids can understandexecute = to do ; to put in effect ; to carry outBTW ITS VERB
WhAt does mastodon matrix mean
write an opinion paragraph or essay of weather kids should have curfews or should they have curfew choose whichever side as long u do it correct but not perfect

Oración en inglés con la palabra got

Answers

i wasn't able to understand what she said but as soon as i understood her i shouted in excitement, "Got You!!"

"I got a sudden pain in my left eye"

"I got the impression that she wasn't happy"

"he got very worried"
i got swag. is that a good one

Plz help this is due in 20 mins

Answers

Answer:

it is B my dude

Explanation:

what reaction is shelley most likely hoping to evoke in the reader A.)disgust, b.)apathy,C.)frustration, D.)apprehension

Answers

Excerpt: "I[the monster] grasped his throat to silence him[William], and in a moment he lay dead at my feet. I gazed on my victim, and my heart swelled with exultation and triumph: clapping my hands, I exclaimed "i too can create desolation."

The answer is option D

By describing such act of violence, performed by the monster to someone else, and how the monster relishes to do it, the author is trying to evoke within the reader a feeling of anxiety and fear that something bad and abominable is about to happen. And it happened. The last words of the monster insinuate that it may continue to cause damage, leaving the reader with the same feeling.

Answer:A

Explanation:

you already know I'm right

Based on the first passage, a reader can logicallypredict that Rainsford will
Abel
Passage 1
Passage 2
Based on the second passage, the reader must revise
the prediction because Rainsford
"Nerve, nerve, nervel" he panted, as he dashed
along. A blue gap showed between the trees
dead ahead. Ever nearer drew the hounds.
Rainsford forced himself on toward that gap. He
reached it. It was the shore of the sea. Across a
cove he could see the gloomy gray stone of the
chateau. Twenty feet below him the sea rumbled
and hissed. Rainsford hesitated. He heard the
hounds. Then he leaned far outi
-"The Most Dangerous Game"
he Most Dangerous Game."
Richard Connell
thought of a way to win the game
decided to give up and let the general kill him
hoped to swim to a passing boat

Answers

Answer: "Die in the rough waters" and "thought of a way to win the game"

Explanation: this is correct on the edge hope this helps! :>

An adverb can answer to the question of 'how' but never ___________.A) how many

B) when

C) in what manner

D) where

Answers

The answer is how many,as an adverb typically describes how things are done in a certain manner,the place,time,etc;

ANSWER:

(A) How many

EXPLANATION:

An adjective describes how something was done, about its manner or where it was done or when.

For Ex: The boy runs fast. In this case fast describes the manner in which he was running. Hence it is adjective.

Another Ex: She was selling fruits near the clock tower. here clock tower shows the place where it happened.

HOPE IT HELPS....

VocabularyAntonyms: Match each word with the word or phrase most nearly its opposite.


pedantic

A.
scholarly

B.
childish

C.
ignorant

D.
sophisticated

Answers

Bydefinition pedantic means ’a person who bothers people by making unintelligentcomments onto things or the one who show off knowledge to much. Among thechoices the best answer would be letter A: scholarly. It means that theknowledge shared is something well-searched, peer-reviewed or has concretebackup findings. Childish is of course, a premature understanding of thingsdealing with emotions alone. Ignorance is a bliss. And sophisticated is usingreasonable arguments or rather ‘sound arguments’ that basically feels right butare actually wrong.