Help Me! I don't understand this problem!
Help Me! I don't understand this problem! - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: A) -0.83

Without the actual numeric data coordinates, it is impossible to compute the true r value. Though we can estimate. The data points are negatively correlated in a fairly strong manner. We can draw a straight line close to all of these points, so the r value is going to be fairly close to -1. The closer r is to -1, the stronger the negative correlation. Having r = -1 exactly means all of the points fall on some single straight line that slopes downward.

Choice B is the next best choice, but its correlation isn't as strong. So that's why I ruled it out. Choices C and D are ruled out immediately since they are positive values.


Related Questions

The table gives the probability distribution of the annual rate of return on the stock of MNP Company, Inc. What is the expected value of the rate of return?
6th grade math :D....
Convert 5 feet 4 inches to centimeters. (2.54 cm = 1 inch) *PLEASE HELPPPP
Solve the equation9x² – 29x – 28 = 0Give your answers to 2 decimal places when appropriate
a bag contains 5 blue sticks,4 red sticks, and 3 orange sticks and you ask a friend to pick one without looking. what is probability that the stick will be blue?

Six college buddies bought each other Christmas gifts. They spent:________.1. $178.622. $247.583. $228.454. $176.645. $180.226. $268.45What was the mean amount spent? Round answer to the nearest cent.a. $243.96b. $213.30c. $319.95d. $255.96

Answers

Answer:

B. $213.30

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean amount spent on Christmas gifts = Σx / n

Where,

Σ= sum of

x= cost of each Christmas gifts

n= number of Christmas gift

Mean amount spent on Christmas gifts = Σx / n

= ( $178.622 + $247.583 + $228.454 + $176.645 + $180.226 + $268.45 ) / 6

= $1,279.98 / 6

= $213.33

Round to the nearest cent

= $213.30

Option b is the correct answer

Final answer:

The mean amount spent by six college buddies on Christmas gifts, They spent:  approximately $213.33 when rounded to the nearest cent.

Explanation:

The process is quite straightforward and involves the principles of statistics, particularly the calculation of the arithmetic mean. Here are the steps we can follow to solve this problem:

  1. First, we need to find the total amount spent. We do this by adding the amounts together: $178.62 + $247.58 + $228.45 + $176.64 + $180.22 + $268.45. When we add these values, we get a total of $1,279.96.
  2. Next, we need to calculate the mean, which in statistics is also commonly referred to as the average. Since there were six buddies, we divide the total amount ($1,279.96) by 6. When we do this, we find that the mean or average amount spent is approximately $213.33 (when rounded to the nearest cent).

Learn more about Mean Calculation here:

brainly.com/question/32703211

#SPJ3

Which is a simplified form of the expression 2c + 2 + 6c – 4?A. 8c + 2
B. 8c – 2
C. 4c + 6
D. 4c – 2

Answers

Answer:

A. 8c+2 that's the answer srr if it's not

Rewrite the following arguments using letters to represent the terms, reduce the number of terms and put the arguments in to standard form. Then test the new forms with Venn diagrams or by means of the five rules for syllogisms to determine the validity or invalidity of the original arguments.1. Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity, so some persons invulnerable to arrest and prosecution are foreign emissaries, because no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.

Answers

Answer:

P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.

P1--->P2--->C

This argument is valid.

Step-by-step explanation: using the syllogism rules.

Premises 1 (P1) = Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity,

Premises 2 (P2) = so some persons invulnerable to arrest and prosecution are foreign emissaries

Conclusion (C) = because no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.

From the argument:

P1 uses "some", that means it's not "all" foreign emissaries person that does not have diplomatic immunity. This means that some other foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity

P2 uses "some", that means it's affirms to that part of P1 which states that some foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity.

The conclusion is valid because the part of P2 which states that some foreign emissaries are vulnerable to arrest, which affirms with P1 which states that Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity. That means no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution. This conclusion literally means that if you don't have diplomatic immunity, you are vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.

Therefore;

P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.

P1--->P2--->C

This argument is valid.

Help plz due in 6 mins

Answers

here what i got
3
12
48
192

A person invests 4000 dollars in a bank. The bank pays 6.25% interest compoundedannually. To the nearest tenth of a year, how long must the person leave the money
in the bank until it reaches 9600 dollars?

Answers

Answer:

14.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Principal = 4000

Interest (r) = 6.25% compounded annually

Calculate time, t, if final amount A = 9600

Using the compound interest formula :

A = P(1 + r/n)^n*t

A = final amount

n = number of times interest is applied per period

9600 = 4000(1 + 0.0625)^t

9600 = 4000(1.0625)^t

9600/4000 = 1.0625^t

2.4 = 1.0625^t

Take the log of both sides

0.3802112 = 0.0263289t

t = 0.3802112/0.0263289

t = 14.440811

t = 14.4 ( nearest tenth)

There are 500 employees in a firm, 45% are female. a sample of 60 employees is selected randomly. the probability that the sample proportion of females is between 0.40 and 0.55 is

Answers

Let X be the number of female employee. Let n be the sample size, p be the probability that selected employee is female.

It is given that 45% employee are female it mean p=0.45

Sample size n=60

From given information X follows Binomial distribution with n=50 and p=0.45

For large value of n the Binomial distribution approximates to Normal distribution.

Let p be the proportion of female employee in the given sample.

Then distribution of proportion P is normal with parameters

mean =p and standard deviation = \sqrt{(p(1-p))/(n)}

Here we have p=0.45

So mean = p = 0.45 and

standard deviation = \sqrt{(0.45(1-0.45))/(60)}

standard deviation = 0.0642

Now probability that sample proportions of female lies between 0.40 and 0.55 is

P(0.40 < P < 0.45) = P((0.40 - 0.45)/(0.0642)  < (P-mean)/(standard deviation)  < (0.55- 0.45)/(0.0642) )

= P(-0.7788 < Z < 1.5576)

= P(Z < 1.5576) - P(Z < -0.7788)

= P(Z < 1.56) - P(Z < -0.78)

= 0.9406 - 0.2177

= 0.7229

The probability that the sample proportion of females is between 0.40 and 0.55 is 0.7229

Final answer:

To find the probability that the sample proportion of females is between 0.40 and 0.55, convert the sample proportions to z-scores and use the z-table to find the probabilities.

Explanation:

To find the probability that the sample proportion of females is between 0.40 and 0.55, we need to find the z-scores associated with these proportions and use the z-table to find the probabilities.

First, we need to convert the sample proportions to z-scores using the formula: z = (p - P) / √(P(1-P) / n), where p is the sample proportion, P is the population proportion, and n is the sample size.

Once we have the z-scores, we can use the z-table to find the probabilities. The probability that the sample proportion of females is between 0.40 and 0.55 is the difference between the probabilities associated with the z-scores for 0.40 and 0.55.

Learn more about Probability here:

brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ3