Answer & Explanation :
A dialectical tension is opposition / contradiction in behaviour of a couple.
Oppositions are antonym of each others, act as cancelation or undo to each other. They are mutually exclusive & mutually exhaustive. They can be related to their internal, external conflicting issues.
Examples :
Dialectical tensions reflect conflicting viewpoints during dialogue with an overarching goal of reaching an accurate reflection of the truth. Contrary to the initial understanding, these tensions are not confined to only external conflicts but can occur within relationships due to contrasting desires from both partners. The process of dialog, understanding, and learning from these tensions is as valuable as arriving at the 'truth'.
Dialectical tensions refer to conflicts within a debate or discussion between two people, and are not confined only to external conflicts. They are part of a dialogue process where individuals exchange ideas with the aim of shaping their beliefs and getting closer to the truth. This dialogue often involves a back-and-forth between different perspectives, with the goal of arriving at a viewpoint that reflects the truth most accurately.
In the context of relationships, dialectical tensions can often occur where there are clashes of desires between two partners. These tensions act as a conflict between differing views or opinions. As stated in the Conflict Theory from sociology, society is seen as a competition for limited resources, and these disparities can cause conflict within relationships as well.
However, it's crucial to note that dialectics is not solely about the creation of sophisticated knowledge. For instance, a deep conversation with a friend about life does not fail if you do not reach a concrete 'truth'. The process of reasoning, understanding and learning from the dialectic approach has as much value, indicating that dialectic tension can be a tool for growth and enhancement in a relationship.
#SPJ6
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The natural and probable consequence doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
Answer:
According to Edwin Lemert, secondary deviance occurs when social reaction intensifies with each act of primary deviance, and the offender becomes stigmatized, accepting the truth of the label.
Explanation:
Edwin Lemert in 1951 stated that secondary deviance is the process of a deviant identity, integrating it into conceptions of self, potentially affecting the individual long term.
According to Edwin Lemert secondary deviation occurs when social reaction intensifies with each act of primary deviance, leading to the stigmatization of the offender. This is a part of the larger theory namely labeling theory which emphasizes the social reaction to certain behaviors.
According to Edwin Lemert secondary deviance occurs when social reaction and societal labeling intensifies with each act of primary deviance leading to the stigmatization of the offender. This process results in the offender accepting the assigned deviant label as their truth. Primary deviance is a violation of norms that does not result in any long-term effects on the individual's self-image or interactions with others. An example of this would be speeding which is a deviant act, but receiving a speeding ticket generally does not cause others view you as a bad person or affect your self-image.
When secondary deviance occurs, the person's self-concept and behaviour begin to change after their actions are labeled as deviant by the members of society. The individual now identifies with the assigned label and this could influence future behaviour leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This concept is part of the broader labeling theory which explains how society's reaction to certain behaviours can actually lead to individuals engaging more in the deviant behaviour they have been labeled with.
#SPJ6
Answer:
Organizational context during learning
Explanation:
Learning process varies in individuals. There are also different types of techniques which a teacher follows to ensure the Students understand the subject topic. The way a solution is fixed and its suitability according to various scenarios is called the organizational context.
In the example above, the explanation in words is vague in long term memory experiences.Pictorial explanations are much better to grasp. This signifies the importance of Organizational context during learning.
Answer:
Van der Waals forces are very strongly repulsive to each other at short nuclear distances.
Explanation:
The Van der Waals forces are the short range forces which acts only for the order of intermolecular distances.
This force is attractive or repulsive between two molecules or atoms depending upon the distance of separation between them, it is repulsive for the distance of the order of size of the nucleus and attractive when the distance is short but larger than the order of size of nucleus.
Theses forces are comparatively weaker than the ionic or covalent bond. These forces are anisotropic in nature which means these do not depend on the orientation of the molecules.
Thus, the correct statement to fill the blank is "Van der Waals forces are very strongly repulsive to each other at short nuclear distances".