Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Sherman's goal was to destroy the Army of the Tennessee, capture Atlanta and cut off vital Confederate supply lines. While Sherman failed to destroy his enemy, he was able to force the surrender of Atlanta in September 1864,boosting Northern morale and greatly improving President Abraham Lincoln's re-election bid.
A.
geography
B.
schooling
C.
character
D.
nationality
6. Which were major reasons that many people left England and came to the American colonies?
A.
a growing upper class and a shrinking population in America
B.
desire for adventure and interest in exploration
C.
interest in getting rich quickly and escaping arrest
D.
widespread poverty and a growing population in England
Presidential vetoes, some people from senate or the house of representatives might kill a bill and keep it from becoming law.
Explanation:
When a bill gets vetoed by the president, then the bill goes back to the congress. The congress for getting the bill passed has to over ride the bill by getting at least a majority vote of two thirds.
But the over riding of the veto is very difficult because getting so many votes in majority is very tough. So if the over riding does not take place, the bill dies and does not become a law.
Interest groups and individuals can kill a bill by lobbying lawmakers and targeting members of relevant committees.
Interest groups and individuals can play a role in killing a bill and preventing it from becoming law.
One way they can do this is by lobbying lawmakers who may consider introducing or sponsoring the legislation. Interest groups first target lawmakers who are likely to be receptive to their views and would be willing to support their cause.
In addition, interest groups can also target members of relevant committees who have a direct influence on the bill. By lobbying committee members, interest groups can indirectly inform other lawmakers who may defer to the expertise and opinions of their colleagues.
#SPJ12
Monarchs historically derived their power from the belief in the divine right, suggesting that their authority came directly from God. In addition to divine right, some monarchs also acquired power through wealth, military force, or hereditary rights. Modern constitutional developments have since curtailed the absolute power of many monarchs.
Historically, monarchs derived their power from the belief in divine right, which postulated that they were chosen by divine entities, such as gods, to rule. This belief system suggested that the authority of a monarch came directly from God, and as such, they were accountable to God alone, leading to unchecked power.
To illustrate, in the medieval period, European monarchs often claimed their power as a divine mandate, codified in the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings. In addition, some monarchs also derived power from their wealth, military force, or heredity.
However, over time, constitutional developments have severely limited the power of monarchs in many countries, relegating many of them to ceremonial roles while real political power rests with democratically elected representatives.
#SPJ6
please be specific