Answer:
Nazi used the term 'Fatherland' as a region where the ancestor of their fathers came from. They often used as a propagandic term to ignite the feeling of nationalism between Aryan citizens and ignite hatred toward the Jewish population which they portrayed as the invaders of their fatherland.
When he said republic, he's referring to the new German government that was re-structure after Germany lost the world war I.
Answer:
No one really knows. It is just assumed he was born on Christmas
Answer:
a ship transporting slaves, especially one carrying slaves from Africa.
Explanation:
Slave ships were large cargo ships specially built or converted from the 17th to the 19th century for transporting slaves. Such ships were also known as "Guineamen" because the trade involved human trafficking to and from the Guinea coast in West Africa.
To pay for war debts
To prevent smuggling
To raise funds for the colonies
The primary reason for the Sugar Act of 1764 is to raise funds for the colonies. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What are the colonies?
A specific population that has migrated to a new location is referred to as "colonies." In the British colony where people dwell, America is a region. A nation that is politically under the control of another nation is known as a colony. Another nation is in control of the people. Aliens from that nation have settled here and are living among the people.
During the period of the 1764, was the established the Sugar act was the focuses on the rises of the fund of the colonies. The rising, the colonial money for the crown. The goods were the shipped for the colonial Crown. There was the French and the Indian War. There was the restricted to the smuggling.
As a result, the primary reason for the Sugar Act of 1764 is to raise funds for the colonies. Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on colonies, here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
C : 50 million
That's the answer you're looking for.
Explanation:
Edge 2020
Answer:
Because he was a conscious literary stylist, both his thought and his manner of expression gave life to his work. Greek historiography had defined ways of depicting history: one could analyze events in plain terms, set the scene with personalities, or heighten the dramatic appeal of human action. Each method had its technique, and the greater writer could combine elements from all three. The Roman “annalistic” form, after years of development, allowed this varied play of style in significant episodes. Tacitus knew the techniques and controlled them for his political interpretations; as a model he had studied the early Roman historiographer Sallust.
It is finally his masterly handling of literary Latin that impresses the reader. He wrote in the grand style, helped by the solemn and poetic usage of the Roman tradition, and he exploited the Latin qualities of strength, rhythm, and colour. His style, like his thought, avoids artificial smoothness. His writing is concise, breaking any easy balance of sentences, depending for emphasis on word order and syntactical variation and striking hard where the subject matter calls for a formidable impact. He is most pointed on the theme of Tiberius, but his technique here is only a concentrated form of the stylistic force that can be found throughout his narrative.
Tacitus’ work did not provide an easy source for summaries of early imperial history, nor (one may guess) was his political attitude popular in the ruling circles; but he was read and his text copied until in the 4th century Ammianus Marcellinus continued his work and followed his style. In modern scholarship Tacitus’ writings are studied seriously—with critical reservation—to reconstruct the early history of the Roman Empire. On the literary side they are appreciated as stylistic masterpieces.