The work done by stretching a certain spring increases by 0.13x joules per centimeter (where x is the displacement, in centimeters, beyond the spring's natural length). How much work (in Joules) must be done in order to stretch the spring from x?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

W = 0.06\cdot (x_(f)^(2)-x_(o)^(2))

Explanation:

The work done by stretching the spring is:

W = 0.13\int\limits^{x_(f)}_{x_(o)} x\, dx

W = 0.06\cdot (x_(f)^(2)-x_(o)^(2))


Related Questions

Which two of the following actions would result in a guitar string sounding a lower note when plucked? A Loosening the string B Tightening the string C Shortening the string D Using a heavier string
Which of the following do waves carry?a) matter b) energy c) matter and energy d) the medium
When it comes to our place in the solar system today which model do we accept
A box contains 9 new light bulbs and 6 used light bulbs. Each light bulb is the same size and shape. Meredith will randomly select 2 light bulbs from the box without replacement. What is the probability Meredith will select a new light bulb and then a used light bulb
Question #4 Multiple Choice Which of the following is a similarity between an industrial metrologist and a legal metrologist? Both are employed by private companies Both ensure confidence in the quality of measurements Both ensure adequate functioning of measurement instruments Both develop measurement standards based on research​

The cloud of interstellar dust and gas that forms a star is known as aA. white dwarf.
B. protostar.
C. red giant.
D. nebula.

Answers

D. nebula

Nebula is the cloud of interstellar dust and gas that forms a star. It is collborately shaped during colliding and collapsing of the interstellar mediums this is influenced by the gravitational attraction of the atoms and particles in the entites. Hence, there are three types of nebular namely, are classical nebula, diffuse nebula, planetary nebular and supernova remnants.

If all the components of a vector are equal to 1, then that vector is a unit vector. Group of answer choices True False

Answers

If all the components of a vector is equal to 1, then that vector is not a unit vector but [√(3)].

Answer: False

Explanation:

Unit Vector

A vector which defines the direction of a physical quantity is known as a Unit Vector. For a vector, the unit vector is the vector/ mod of the value. Since the mod of a unit vector is always 1, the value is simply represented as its vector form.

If we take all the components of a vector quantity as 1, then its mod will be,

√(1+1+1) i.e. √(3) which is not a unit vector.

Hence, the given statement is false.

Final answer:

All components of a vector being equal to 1 does not necessarily define a unit vector. A unit vector is defined by having a magnitude, or length, of 1. Unless it's a 1-D vector with its single component as 1, a vector with all components as 1 won't be a unit vector.

Explanation:

In mathematics, particularly vector algebra, a unit vector is a vector of length 1. The condition you've mentioned – all components of a vector being equal to 1 – does not generally define a unit vector. When the components of a vector are all 1s (in a 2D or 3D space, for instance), the resultant vector is not a unit vector. This is because the magnitude or length of a vector is calculated by the square root of the sum of the squares of its components.

Learn more about Unit Vector here:

brainly.com/question/34814688

#SPJ3

Any help is appreciated

Answers

image distance,di=10 cm

object distance,do=20cm

magnification, m=di/do

=10/20

=0.5

since the image is virtual, magnification is negative.

therefore m=-0.5

When evaporation occurs in a dish of water, the molecules left behind in the water: a) Are larger in size. b) Are more concentrated. c) Are less dense. d) Are transformed into gas.

Answers

Answer:

b) Are more concentrated.

Explanation:

Examine the false statement. Scientists can directly observe the half-life of all radioactive elements. What option rewords the statement so that it is true? Select all that apply. Scientists can calculate the rate of nuclear decay for all radioactive elements using half-life. Scientists can calculate the half-life of all radioactive elements using the rate of nuclear decay. Scientists cannot directly observe or calculate the rate of nuclear decay for all radioactive elements. Scientists can directly observe the rate of nuclear decay for all radioactive elements.

Answers

Answer:

Scientists can directly observe the rate of nuclear decay for all radioactive elements.

Scientists can calculate the half-life of all radioactive elements using the rate of nuclear decay

Explanation:

I just took a test and got it right

If you drop a stone into a hole drilled all the way to the other side of Earth, the stone will _____. A. speed up until it gets to the center of Earth B. slow down until it reaches the center of Earth C. speed up until it reaches the other side of Earth D. stop at the center of Earth

Answers

D. It would speed up, then go a little bit of the way to the other side, then it would come back to the centre. But if you do drop a stone down that hole, please put a GoPro on it.
If you live in the USA and you drill a hole all the way through the Earth
to the other side (don't try this at home), then the Indian Ocean will pour
into the hole before you have a chance to do any experiments with it.

But this is our "gedanken" (thought)-experiment, we own it, and we can
add any additional helpful rules to it that we need. So let's say that we got
the government of India to help us with our experiment, and all the time
we were drilling, they had ships out in the Indian Ocean building a wall
around the spot we're aiming for. The wall is a cylinder, 6-inches across
the open end and about 5 miles long ... whatever it has to be to reach the
bottom and settle 1 foot into the mud down there.  The wall is completed
2 weeks before the tip of our drill reaches the Earth's surface on the other
side, and the Indian Navy Corps of Engineers uses that 2 weeks to pump
all the water out of that cylinder, so that when the tip of our drill pops out
of the ocean floor, there's nothing but sunshine above it.

Now we start the experiment.  The President of The United States and
several hundred scientists, important people, celebrities and dignitaries
are all gathered around the hole in the ground.  The Chief Scientist on
the Project hands the stone to the POTUS, and she bends down and
gently drops it into the hole.

The stone falls into the hole, going deeper and deeper, down to where
the sun don't shine, and nobody can see it any more.  People wait around
for a while, staring into the hole, but there's nothing seen or heard. 
They get bored and start to leave, first one or two people at a time ...
those with the shortest attention spans.  Then in small groups, and
eventually everybody gives up and leaves.  There's nobody left there
86 minutes later.  The stone reappears in the hole, quietly, for just an
instant, rising to exactly the same height as the President's hand was
when she let it go, stopping for an instant, and then just as quickly and
quietly falling back down into the hole, to repeat the whole journey.

Here's what happened to the stone when it was dropped:

-- It fell straight down toward the center of the Earth.falling faster and faster,
gaining speed all the time but with less and less acceleration.

-- It reached its maximum speed as it reached the center of the Earth. 
I regret that just now I can't tell you what that speed was, because I don't
know it. But whatever it was, it depended only on the Earth's mass, and
it would have been the same speed for ANY stone that was dropped into
the hole and could fit through without scraping the sides.

-- As the stone passed the center of the Earth, it began to lose speed,
with small deceleration at first, but at a growing rate as it continued farther
from the Earth's center.

-- It arrived at the surface on the other side of the globe 43 minutes after
it was dropped into the hole.  As it approached the surface, its speed shrank
to zero, just as its acceleration peaked at 9.8 m/s², and it stopped, for just
an instant, at the surface.  In that instant, it was in exactly the same position
and situation as at the moment it was dropped from the hand in the USA, and
if there had been another hand there to grab it, it could have been grabbed
and placed on display in the Museum of Geology at Tech Mahindra's head-
quarters near Mumbai.  But there was no hand there, and no sooner had it
appeared at the mouth of the hole and hesitated briefly, than it began to fall
back into the hole, just as if it had been dropped from THIS side.

-- After another 43 minutes, the stone reappeared at the mouth of the hole
in the USA and stopped for an instant.  It was 86 minutes since the original
drop. The sound equipment and the lighting had all been taken down, the
technicians were gone, the reporters and their cameramen were all at the
bars, and there were only a few movers left at the scene, dismantling the
VIP bleachers and loading them into the rented trucks. One of them was
leaning against a truck, catching his breath and wiping his brow, when
something caught his eye. He noticed a stone slowly rising from under-
ground toward the mouth of the hole in the ground. Just as the stone
slowly reached the surface, he reached down, plucked it out of the hole,
dropped it into his pocket, climbed into the driver's seat of the truck, and
headed for the rental garage.

The stone did exactly the dance of a pendulum, but without the string ...
minimum speed with maximum potential energy and acceleration at the
ends, maximum speed and kinetic energy with minimum acceleration in
the middle, and a period of 86 minutes.

===>  Same period as a satellite in the lowest possible Earth orbit ...
one that skims the Earth's surface just above the mountain peaks, if
there were no atmosphere.  86 minutes.  Both for the same reasons,
but which I don't think I could explain like I used to, even if you wanted
to hear it.