Bobby consumes only chocolate and vanilla ice cream and he is spending all of his income. For the last scoop of chocolate and vanilla ice cream that he bought, his marginal utility of chocolate is 100 and his marginal utility of vanilla is 250, and the price of chocolate is $1.00 per scoop and the price of vanilla is $2.00 per scoop. Bobby would maximize his utility by_____________________________________ ice cream. Assume that Bobby could buy any fraction of a scoop of (e.g., he could buy ½ scoop) of ice cream (continuous in quantity).

A. only purchasing vanilla ice cream, but no chocolate
B. purchasing more chocolate and less vanilla
C. purchasing more vanilla and less chocolate
D. not changing his purchases of chocolate and vanilla
E. only purchasing chocolate ice cream, but no vanilla

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

D. not changing his purchases of chocolate and vanilla


Related Questions

Automation of a process activity consists of moving work from the ________ of the symmetrical five-component framework.
You are not required to stop for a school bus traveling toward you separated by a median or barrier that is a minimum of____feet in width Two Five 10 50
The money you pay for an insurance policy is called your
Bankruptcy filings are given names according toA. their severity. B. the bankruptcy court district where the case is filed. C. the bankruptcy code chapter under which the case is filed. D. the dollar value of the assets owned by the debtor.
All of these are ways a society can improve its productivity EXCEPT

Market failure occurs when a free market is unable toa. distribute resources efficiently.
b. provide open opportunity
c. meet government regulations.
d. encourage innovation

Answers

The market failures can result in overproduction, underproduction, misallocation of resources, and negative externalities (such as pollution) address these failures and promote economic efficiency and societal well-being, governments may intervene through policies and regulations, such as taxes, subsidies, antitrust laws, and public provision of certain goods and services.

**Market failure occurs when a free market is unable to:**

**a. distribute resources efficiently.**

Explanation:

Market failure refers to a situation in which the free market system, left to its own devices without government intervention, fails to allocate resources efficiently.

Here's a breakdown of the options:

- **a. Distribute resources efficiently:** This is the correct statement. Market failure occurs when resources, such as goods and services, are not allocated in a way that maximizes societal welfare or efficiency.

Examples of market failure include externalities (positive or negative), public goods, information asymmetry, and monopolies, all of which can lead to inefficient resource allocation.

- **b. Provide open opportunity:** While providing open opportunity is an important aspect of a free market system, market failure is specifically related to inefficiencies in resource allocation, not necessarily a lack of opportunity.

- **c. Meet government regulations:** Market failure can occur in the presence of government regulations or in their absence.

Government regulations are often put in place to address market failures or prevent them, but market failures can still occur despite regulations.

- **d. Encourage innovation:** The role of market failure is not directly related to innovation.

However, innovation can be influenced by market conditions, and market failures may hinder or distort incentives for innovation.

For similar questions on Market failures

brainly.com/question/18958169

#SPJ6

In economics, market failure is a situation in which the allocation of goods and services by a free market is not efficient, often it leads to a net social welfare loss. (Wikipedia definition)

The answer is A. Distribute resources efficiently.

___________ typically refers to the promotion and sale of different versions of a media product across the various subsidiaries of a media conglomerate.

Answers

Answer: Synergy

Explanation:

Synergy is described as the intercommunication in between two or more entities in order to construct a collaborative effect. This effect is known to be greater than the effort that would have be in place , if they were acting alone. In comparison to the cross media concurrence, the synergy takes place when the media commodity is being advertised across the other platforms. Example, a commodity being promoted in a movie.

Which is a health benefit of receiving feedback?A) to gain insight about our health so we can improve it
B) to increase our trust in others
C) to increase our awareness of the life cycle
D) to form a new identity based on outside observation

Answers

your answer is A - To gain insight about our health so we can improve it

receiving feedback won't help  to form a new identity based on outside observation or  trusting others but can help trusting ourself

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Merrill Lynch : Case study Summary of Case The case profiles the financial crisis at Merrill Lynch at the end of the last decade, which was acquired by Bank of America for $50 billion. B of A received government assistance during the financial crisis from (and was covered by) TARP (the Troubled Asset Relief Program). One initial consequence of TARP coverage was that some employees, including some high-level,high-revenue generating employees began to leave larger financial institutions like Merrill Lynch/Bank of America to go to so-called "boutique" financial services firms, which had not received TARP money and thus were not covered by TARP restrictions on compensation. Another initial reaction was an increase in base pay levels and a decrease in bonus levels, apparently in response to all of the negative publicity bonuses had received and as a way to get around TARP restrictions. Students are expected to analyze the decision of Merrill Lynch to change employee compensation just to get around TARP restrictions on compensation. However, now, that some time has passed, the economy has recovered (somewhat), and the stock market has bounced back, Merrill Lynch and other financial services companies are making money again. At Merrill Lynch, there is always a lot of action and discussion around compensation strategy. Merrill introduced a plan to expand its number of financial advisors by 8 % (about 1,200 people). Where would they come from? Other firms? How would Merrill get them to move? By offering unusually high up-front signing bonuses and decentralizing authority to make such offers. Traditionally, top brokers from other firms can receive 1.5X their pay at the firm they are leaving. Merrill was not the only firm looking to add top brokers. Indeed, what was described as a "bidding war" broke out, and signing bonuses were reported to have gone as high as 3X or 4X previous pay in some cases. Why the bidding war? "Wealth management firms make the bulk of their profits on the top 10 percent of their producers" according to compensation attorney Katten Muchin. And, very wealthy clients tend to be more loyal to their advisors than to the advisors’ firms. At Merrill, there are some concerns among financial advisors. First, in the non-Merrill part of Bank of America, brokers are under a discretionary bonus system rather than an (objective) incentive system where pay is based on a formula. Merrill financial advisors fear that Bank of America wants to extend that system to cover them. Second and likely related, non-Merrill brokers at B of A are expected to cross-sell—in other words, to push products sold by other parts of the bank. The opportunities for such synergies are typically seen as a source of competitive advantage for a large, diversified financial institution such as B of A. However, cross-selling performance (and cooperation) is difficult to assess objectively. Thus, subjective evaluations are likely necessary. Merrill brokers appear to be opposed to cross-selling, both because they are concerned it could undermine their relationships with their clients and because they prefer to have their pay determined by objective measures. 3. Should Bank of America change its compensation strategy to include more subjective assessments of performance and a greater emphasis on cross-selling? What effect might this have on its success in the bidding war for top brokers? 5 Marks

Answers

Bank of America should carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of changing its compensation strategy before making any decisions.

It should prioritize building a strong culture and brand, offering a fair and transparent compensation package, and fostering long-term relationships with clients and financial advisors.

What are the responses to other questions?

Bank of America may consider changing its compensation strategy to include more subjective assessments of performance and a greater emphasis on cross-selling, but it needs to weigh the potential impact of such changes on its success in the bidding war for top brokers.

Introducing more subjective assessments of performance may result in a fairer evaluation of financial advisors, as it would consider factors beyond just the numbers. It could incentivize advisors to focus more on long-term relationships with clients rather than short-term gains. Cross-selling could also increase revenue for the company and provide a competitive advantage in the market.

However, there are risks associated with these changes. Financial advisors may feel that their compensation is being unfairly influenced by subjective evaluations, leading to a loss of trust and motivation. This could lead to increased turnover and difficulty in attracting and retaining top talent. Furthermore, emphasizing cross-selling may alienate clients and erode their trust in the firm, ultimately leading to a decline in revenue.

In the bidding war for top brokers, Bank of America may need to consider the overall compensation package it offers. While signing bonuses can attract brokers, a more competitive overall compensation package, including a fair and transparent incentive system, may be more effective in attracting and retaining top talent. Bank of America may also need to focus on developing a strong culture and brand that aligns with the values of financial advisors and appeals to their desire for long-term success.

In summary, Bank of America should carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of changing its compensation strategy before making any decisions. It should prioritize building a strong culture and brand, offering a fair and transparent compensation package, and fostering long-term relationships with clients and financial advisors.

learn more about compensation strategy:brainly.com/question/30665272

#SPJ1

_______ segmentation is used when the firm can identify a group of consumers with common needs and wants that spans the entire globe.

Answers

Answer:

Global Segmentation

Explanation:

Global Segmentation - it is referred to that strategy in marketing that aside from the potential customer in one category or list that has the same behaviors for any products. it is done to focus on such customer and their products to meet their needs.

structure analysis has done for obtaining segmentation

- analyze the potential needs of customers

- then analyze the behavior of customers sharing the same characteristics

- then, at last, determine the potential customers who need it.

What is the difference between closed-end credit and open-end credit

Answers

Open-credit has no limit while closed credit has a finite limit.