20 points2. Which of the following pieces of key information is used in both
articles? *

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Wait...Where’s the other information?

Related Questions

Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote only in the sonnet form. a. True b. False
Part B Which quotation from the story helps the reader understand the meaning of the simile in Part A
75 is 10 less than my Number.55 Is 10 moré than my Number.what is my number?
Which kind of phrase are the underlined words in the sentence? Marvin, a friend I met last summer, takes guitar lessons. Underlined words: A friend i met last summer A.adverb phrase B.appositive phrase C.adjective phrase
HELPWho says the following and why? "Good riddance! Let the girl go roving to find herself a man from foreign parts. She only spurns her own— countless Phaeacians round about who court her, nothing but our best." * 1. Nausicaa is speaking for a hypothetical onlooker. 2. An "old salt" is mocking Nausicaa behind her back. 3. Nausicaa's mother is scolding her for wanting Odysseus as a husband. 4. Nausicaa's handmaidens are encouraging her to wed a local man.

How many independent clasues does this sentence have? Since I didn't have homework, I went to the mall with my friends, but I forgot to study for my test.

Answers

Answer:

3 independent clauses

Explanation:

Independent clauses is defined as a group of word that consists of a subject as well as a verb. And the group of words should always express a complete though. An independent clause is a full sentence with a meaning containing verb and a subject.

In the context, the sentence contains 3 independent clauses:

-- I didn't have homework

   Here, 'I' is the subject and 'didn't' is the verb.

-- Iwent to the mall

   Here, 'I' is the subject and 'went' is the verb.  

-- I forgot to study

   Here, 'I' is the subject and 'forgot' is the verb.

"Nonviolence: A Force More Powerful Than Electricity" by Peter M. Loveless1 In 1936, Mohandas Gandhi was asked if nonviolent resistance was a form of direct action. “It is not one form,” he answered. “It is the only form…It is the greatest…force in the world…It is.. a force which is more positive than electricity, and more powerful than ever ether.”



2 Nonviolence is a political force that has helped shape history. In many cases it receives less attention than violent conflict such as war or guerrilla activity. Yet is has often produced momentous change. Governments as entrenched as South Africa’s apartheid government, the British occupation of India, and communist Poland have crumbled in the face of ordinary, unarmed people.



3 How is it possible for people to bring about such change when confronting powerful opponents? There are various factors that contribute to the success of nonviolence.



4 First, it is important to understand how governments rule. Political power involves a relationship between the rulers and the workers. Local governments, schools, and businesses rely on the cooperation of the people to run smoothly. Even the most rigid states depend on this cooperation, although they may secure it through invisible forces such as fear or loyalty.



5 Sometimes people in a society are willing to obey the government due to a sense of helplessness or anxiety. Rulers can then behave as they wish. Subjects may withdraw their consent to be governed, however, and this can lead to the disintegration of power.



6 If there is widespread disobedience in a society, rulers will often inflict punishments. Maintaining control in this way requires that some citizens – often a police force or army willing to crush resistance – remain loyal to the government. In many cases, however, people refuse to give in to this kind of force.



7 Another important factor in nonviolence is the number of people willing to take action. Once a campaign of disobedience becomes widespread, it gains momentum and can become a significant force. As more people become involved in disobedience, it becomes harder for a government to control them with violence or imprisonment.



8 As author Gene Sharp writes, “The theory that power derives from violence, and that victory necessarily goes to the side with the greater capacity for violence, is false.” To attain victory

through nonviolence, however, people must understand the methods that are at their disposal. These tools can be divided roughly into three classes.



9 The first kind is symbolic or persuasive action. Protest marches, vigils, speeches, posters, banners, and the like may be used to gain support for a cause.



10 Another method is refusal to cooperate – a passive, but powerful, form of resistance. When citizens disagree with a law, they may disobey it. Workers may go on strike. This happened when Lech Walesa led the Polish people out of the grasp of Soviet control in the 1980s. By bringing an economy to its knees, strikes can result in the total collapse of a regime. Similarly, people can join boycotts or refuse to pay taxes, and government officials, police, and soldiers can all disobey orders. In the end, the entire system that props up a ruler’s power can be taken apart. Then the ruler is no more powerful than any other individual.



11 The third category of nonviolent action is intervention. People may intervene in order to disrupt a situation that they think is causing harm. Methods include sit-ins and peaceful direct action. People may act in ways that they know will lead to their imprisonment, which in turn focuses negative publicity on their opponents. One famous example of this occurred in 1955 in Montgomery, Alabama, when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white passenger.



12 It is often assumed that nonviolence methods take longer to succeed than violent approaches. In fact, the reverse may be true; in some cases, nonviolence has brought about change in a matter of weeks or days.



13 As Leo Tolstoy wrote, “Violence can never destroy what is accepted by public opinion. On the contrary, public opinion need only be diametrically opposed to violence to destroy its every action.”



14 Once a path of nonviolence is chosen, it is crucial to stick to that path. To shift to the use of violence is to adopt the tools of the oppressive regime. The use of violence can dissuade ordinary people from supporting a cause. Valuable allies may turn away. And, in the face of a heavily armed opponent, violence is unlikely to succeed. In contrast, nonviolent resistance has been described as “political jujitsu.” Nonviolence uses the force and weight of an opposing regime against itself in order to bring about the regime’s defeat.



1.
As it is used in paragraph 7, the word momentum most nearly means:

power

time

involvement

adherence

Answers

Answer: Power

Explanation: It's saying it's uprsising in power

When you connect what you already know to new information, you are ___________________ the two ideas.encountering

restating

associating

communicating

Answers

Answer:

3) Associating

Explanation:

The definition of associating is to connect (something) with something else. 

Based on City, what can be inferred about the technology of the ancient Romans?A.It was deceptive. b. It was laughable.
c. It was inferior.
d. It was advanced.

Answers

The correct answer is (d.) It was advanced. Based on City, the advancement of the technology can be inferred about the technology of the ancient Romans. Their technology supported the Roman civilization and as well as the Roman military to be possible.
It is D.............It was a complicated society 

Katie .

what is the subject of the following sentence? As she slalomed lightning-fast around the moguls, Jessica knew she would win the race

Answers

 I think she is the subject 

Answer: The answer is Jessica

Explanation: Jessica is the one that's running the race.

According to Renaissance philosophy, commoners often represent A. appetite.
B. love.
C. reason.
D. pride.

Answers

The answer is A. The assignment "Renaissance theory" is utilized by researchers of scholarly history to allude to the possibility of the period running in Europe generally in the vicinity of 1355 and 1650 (the dates move forward for focal and northern Europe and for zones, for example, Spanish America, India, Japan, and China under European impact).

According to the above we can infer that the  Renaissancephilosophy, commoners often represent A. appetite.

What does commoners represent in Renaissance philosophy?

In Renaissancephilosophy, the human psyche was often divided into three parts: appetite, reason, and will. Commoners, or the lower class, were associated with the "appetitive" part of the psyche. This aspect referred to desires, passions, and instinctual drives.

The commoners were considered to be driven by their material needs and bodily desires. They were associated with the lower, more basic aspects of human nature. In contrast, reason was associated with the intellectual and rational faculties, while will represented the higher, moral aspects of human nature.

So, in Renaissance philosophy, commoners were often symbolically linked to appetite (option a).

Learn more about Renaissance philosophy in: brainly.com/question/34217043
#SPJ6