Which statement does not explain why the United States entered World War One

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The Japanese launched a surprise attack on the United States.

Explanation:


Related Questions

What was the general premise of this case?
What was the purpose of the harsh punishments under the Qin dynasty
How did queen Hatshepsut’s Policies affect the kingdom of Egypt?
Which of the following words has both a prefix and a suffix?A. UniformB. UnprofessionalC. JoyfulD. Smoothness
What role might discrimination play when it comes to punishing convicted criminals

Do you think the consequences of imperialism/colonialism are more positive or negative?

Answers

It had a negative impact

What was the very first tax imposed on the american colonists​

Answers

it would probably have to stamp act, if this is wrong sorry

Which of the following was the first instance or classifying cases as criminal or civil<br /><br />a-code of hammurabi<br />
b-mosaic law<br />
c-roman law<br />
d-common law​

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Roman Law.

Explanation:

Roman law is the law that was applied in ancient times, first in Rome and later in the entire Roman Empire. Since the sources of ancient Roman law collected in the Corpus iuris civilis were rediscovered in Bologna in the high Middle Ages, the effect of Roman law continued into the 19th century, as the sources were considered authoritative for the law in most European countries. The establishment of the Corpus Iuris Civilis as valid imperial law in the Holy Roman Empire led to codifications in today's Europe, which conceptually led to the reception of Roman law.  

Roman law was essentially not purely statutory law, but rather consisted of a triad of legal sources in which common law and legal law played a major role regulating both private relationships between individuals, as well as public law regarding crime and governmental issues.

Most of what scientists know about extinct species is form

Answers

What do you need there is nothing I can anwser

Short Answer Questions:Using the excerpt above, answer (a), (b), and (c)

a) Describe the conditions in America around 1840 that encouraged young women to seek employment outside of

their home.

b) List and explain three reasons Orestes Brownson used to oppose the employment of women as factory

"operatives."

c) Identify an argument from the "Lowell Offering" and explain how it countered the position of Orestes Brownson.

Answers

Answer :

Orestes Brownson was an intellectual writer from New England. He wrote many books on human labor and mainly focused on the social life and conditions of the American women.

Explanation:

a). Women in America could work in factories so that they can receive better wages or money which enables them to live a new dignified life and ideal life. They are able to receive good clothes, good houses and decent environment and conditions that encouraged them to work outside their homes. They were free form the domestic work and were independent.

b). The women got very little from the treatment and they die a tragic death. They die from harsh conditions and nobody marries them. To Orestes Brownson, this ruins or destroys the notion of virtuous girl.

c). It was very nice for the women of America and they got paid better wages. The women are also treated well and paid quite a bit. This contributed to the greater good to of the society and we should be happy about this.

Final answer:

The conditions in 1840 America encouraged women to work due to economic stress and industrialization. Brownson opposed this, citing health concerns, potential exposure to immorality, and disruption to gender norms. However, the 'Lowell Offering' countered by emphasizing women’s financial independence.

Explanation:

a) The conditions in America around 1840 that prompted young women to look for employment outside their homes included economic need, gradual industrialization, and the desire for personal and financial independence. Industrialization led to the rise of factories that needed a cheap source of labor, which was fulfilled by women and children. b) Orestes Brownson opposed the employment of women in factories, or as 'operatives', for three main reasons: health concerns, the fear of ungodly influences and the belief that it disrupted gender roles. He thought that the hard labor and long hours could damage a woman's health; that the factory environment could expose women to immoral influences; and that it broke traditional societal norms where the woman's place was in the home. c) An argument from the 'Lowell Offering' countered Brownson's position. One common theme was that working allowed women to gain financial independence and escape any potential poverty or dependence on men. This countered Brownson’s belief that women's work was destructive to societal norms.

Learn more about Women's Employment in 1840's America here:

brainly.com/question/32269888

#SPJ11

How are ancient Native American leaders similar to ancient Egyptians leaders

Answers

Answer:

How were ancient Native American leaders similar to ancient Egyptian leaders? Leaders of both cultures controlled the local economy. Leaders of both cultures used a system to control society Leaders of both cultures were elected by the people. Leaders of both cultures were worshipped as gods.

Explanation: