What outsiders traded with Southern Africans before the Europeans arrived?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

The first Europeans to enter Southern Africa were the Portuguese, who from the 15th century edged their way around the African coast in the hope of outflanking Islam, finding a sea route to the riches of India, and discovering additional sources of food. They reached the Kongo kingdom in northwestern Angola in 1482–83; early in 1488 Bartolomeu Dias rounded the southern tip of the continent; and just over a decade later Vasco da Gama sailed along the east coast of Africa before striking out to India. Although the voyages were initially unpromising, they marked the beginning of the integration of the subcontinent into the new world economy and the dominance of Europeans over the indigenous inhabitants.


Related Questions

Which of the following is a fossil fuel? a. copperb. cattlec. oild. aluminum
Urbanization of Europe in the High Middle Ages resulted in thebuilding of smaller churches rather than grand cathedralscanceling of barter agreements and feudal chartersdevelopment of medieval guild towns and citiesexpansion of feudalism into a patchwork of kingdoms
Whoch statement accurately describes the duomo in florence
President Wilson's Fourteen Points outlined a few general principles, some specific demands about national borders, and most importantly, _____.
In the early years of the Industrial Revolution, factory owners paid women _____.higher wages than menthe same wages as menlower wages than menin material goods and foodstuffs

how does the structure of the executive branch affect accountability in the system? (in the context of federalist no 70)

Answers

Answer:

The structure of the executive branch forces the country to rely and trust the decisions made by the president. The citizens of the United States have to trust that he’ll do what’s in our best interest. No one that plays a role in the executive branch can slack off or not do their work because everyone depends on each other.

Explanation:

Answer:

The structure of the executive branch forces the country to rely and trust the decisions made by the president. The citizens of the United States have to trust that he’ll do what’s in our best interest. No one that plays a role in the executive branch can slack off or not do their work because everyone depends on each other.

Explanation:

Why do you think the US wanted to contain communism? Why is communism being represented by a vulture? What is the vulture caring and what does it mean? How is the US Congress portrayed in the cartoon and why is congress being depicted that way?

Answers

The U.S. wanted to contain communism because they believed that Communism was the ultimate evil (citizens had no rights whereas in the U.S. we are free). Communism is represented as a vulture because vultures are not the friendliest animal is communism isn't the most friendly type of government. The vulture is carrying chaos because that is what people believed Communism would bring to Western Europe if the Soviet Union overtook that area. Congress is portrayed as a doctor who is rushing to save Western Europe from chaos. Congress did achieve this by issuing the Marshall Plan which helped Western Europe rebuild after the war so their governments wouldn't be tempted to join the Soviet Union.

The US Congress wanted to contain communism because free enterprise and the capitalist system were the cornerstones of the American economy and, by extension, the American way of life, the United States felt endangered by the development of communism.

1.) The USSR's communism was feared to spread from one nation to the next, destabilizing one, which would then destabilize the next and allow communist regimes to rule the region. This was especially the domino effect that the USSR dreaded.

2.) Americans may believe that the Soviet Union is malevolent or that it exploits the European countries' weakness for its own gain.

3.) In the manner that a stork typically carries a baby in cartoons, the vulture is carrying a child identified as chaos. According to the cartoonist, communism will destabilize Western Europe.

4.) The cartoons' primary objective is not to amuse but to persuade. An excellent political cartoon provokes discussion on current affairs while simultaneously attempting to persuade you to agree with the cartoonist's viewpoint.

Therefore, all four questions have been answered in the main answer.

Learn more about The US Congress here,

brainly.com/question/30185586

#SPJ6

100 pointsImagine that you are an adviser to either China’s emperor or Japan’s shogun. Write a letter advising the ruler whether you support a policy of isolation or engagement. Explain your reasons for supporting that policy. Your letter should be three paragraphs that are 5-7 complete sentences each and each paragraph should discuss one reason for supporting or opposing isolation. Be sure to discuss the pros or cons that we discussed in class.

PROS No War, Less Disease, No Fights, No Drama, Peace, Prosperity , Independent

CONS More Good Trades, More Money, More knowledge, Loss of culture, Higher Chance of War or conflicts

Answers

Answer:

To the Almighty Emperor of China:

I write to you as an imperial adviser in order to suggest to you to maintain the policies of commercial isolation that you have been carrying out against neighboring kingdoms.

As a first argument, I must tell you that we are in the middle of a political crisis, and it wouldn't be strange if it leads to a war. For this reason, nothing more accurate than isolate the economies of the potential enemies of the Empire.

In addition, the destination of goods for sale abroad has conditioned the supply within the country. We must take care of our people, offering more quantity of goods at a lower price, as established by the law of supply and demand.

Finally, I must emphasize that our economy is much more developed than that of neighboring kingdoms, so our commercial policy is not much more than an act of charity and solidarity. But at these times of crisis and tension, the only possible solidarity is respect to our people and our Empire.

For these reasons I consider maintaining and deepening the isolation policies will be the best option.

Long live to our Emperor.

Explanation:

Who led the Bolsheviks to revolution in Russia during World War I?a. Czar Nicholas II
b. Archduke Franz Ferdinand
c. Vladimir Lenin
d. President Woodrow Wilson

Answers

C. Vladimir Lenin led the revolution in Russia during WWI

Why is NATO still relevant today?

Answers

NATO is still relevant today because it serves as a vital platform for collective defense and cooperation among member states.

Why does NATO continue to be relevant in the modern world?

NATO's continued relevance in the modern world can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the alliance provides a framework for collective defense ensuring that member states can respond collectively to any aggression or security threats.

This serves as a deterrent and promotes stability in the Euro-Atlantic region. Also, NATO facilitates military cooperation, intelligence sharing, and joint training exercises which enhance interoperability and effectiveness among member forces.

Read more about NATO

brainly.com/question/4273334

#SPJ6

Allied nations should always be ready to respond to threats.

How were the French and American Revolutions similar and different?

Answers

 for being similar i will say they are the consequences of the "Lumières" (Enlightenment), with some ideals of constitution, liberty, self government, etc. 

BUT, there are also VERY different : 
-the American Revolution is more a revolt (against taxes) which became a war (it is a war of independence more than a revolution) 
-The French Revolution is really different and it is more the failure of a system, what we called "Ancien Régime" (Former Rule), a system which can not work anymore since the 1770's (the nobles do not pay taxes for example when there is a MAJOR deficit). A system which blew up in 1789 when the king called the Etats Généraux (States General, see wikipedia) to enact new taxes, but the deputies decided to not do that and create an Assemblée Nationale (National Assembly) to write a constitution. the result is a real mess for at least 10 years (in fact 1 monarchy and at least 5 different republic during this time) 

So yes they are a little bit similar (it is the Age of Enlightenment) but they are mainly different, because the American one is an uprising against something (the British) and the French is more the end of a system and the different experiences to find a new one.