Answer:
Harsh living conditions and restricted civil liberties
Explanation:
Inflation was high, the food prices increasing every month, wages were low and products in shops were scares. People had to stand in long lines (often overnight ) just to get the basic supplies. The medical care was lacking the necessary equipment and medications, petrol was rationed and the private ownership was frowned upon or prohibited.
Workers were not allowed to form unions and fight for their rights, the press was not free, criticism of the government was forbidden and punishable. People were not allowed to travel freely, their assembly rights not respected and the elections not democratic.
The speaker of the House is the official who succeeds the president if he dies in office and the vice president is unable to assume the role. Option C is correct.
In the case that the president can no longer serve, the vice president would succed him.However, if the vice president is unable to serve, the line of succession falls to the speaker of the House, then to the Senate president pro tempore, and then to Cabinet members.
C. Speaker of the House
Answer:
+ No central leadership (executive branch)
+ Congress had no power to enforce its laws.
+ Congress had no power to tax.
I hope that this helps! have a nice day :)))
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Justice Goldber based his concurring opinion in the protection granted by the Constitution to the rights of people.
Explanation:
Griswold v. Connecticut was a major court decision in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protects the right to privacy. The ruling concerned a state law in Connecticut called Comstock Law that prohibited anyone from using "drugs, medical items or instruments to prevent conception". By a vote of seven votes to two, the Supreme Court invalidated this law by considering that it violated the right to marital intimacy.
In 1961, Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton opened a family planning center that welcomed many young women. They were sued by the state of Connecticut for violating the Comstock Law, which prohibited the delivery of any substance or material that may prevent fertilization. They were fined $ 100 each. Estelle Griswold appealed the decision of the Connecticut court to the Supreme Court, which in 1965 rendered a judgment in its favor, explaining that the Comstock Law violated the 5th, 9th and 14th amendments.
Justice Arthur Goldbert wielded a concurrent opinion based on the 9th Amendment and the protection it gives to the right to privacy.
B) Ottoman troops are numerically superior to European forces.
C) Ottoman forces are hardier and more disciplined than European forces.
D) Ottoman forces are better fed than European forces.
E) All these answers are correct.