Do you think it was moral for European nations to claim lands in the Americas that were already inhabited by natives???

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: No because they took land from the Natives without asking the Natives

Related Questions

What power did the pharaoh exercise?
How did the balance of power in Europe shift as a result of World War One
The northwest ordinance is considered a historicl milestone because
What is the meant by the expression "shot heard 'the world "?
What economic activity was most widespread in the United States in the early 1800s

Why do people support women rights

Answers

Answer:

Because people in the past didn't really care on what women cared about or their opinion so know that we are all equal more people want women to have more rights and stuff like that.

Describe Guatemala’s government and military today.

Answers

Government is Presidential Republic

In this type of  governmentthe Executive and Legislative branches maintain a very close relationship, as their areas of activity have many points of intersection. For that, there are different government systems. The main two are parliamentarism and presidentialism.

Answer: Guatemala elected a democratic government in 1996 and the military today is powerful.

Explanation: Possible answer for edge practice test.

Which amendment is," Freedom to hold meetings and to ask the government to hear complaints"?

Answers

i think it is amendment #1

The warming of the climate at the end of the Ice Age did not affect the move to Mesopotamia. A. True B. False

Answers

Answer:

B. False

Explanation:

Many historians and climate scientists believe strongly that among the factors that influenced the movement to Mesopotamia of the first humans that left Africa, this was because of the first heatwave that the end of the Ice Age was bringing, for geoscientist and historians this heatwave found in studies done on the Antartica and Greenland shows that the massive migration from Africa, through Mesopotamia and into Asia was mostly related to the end of the Ice Age.

well yes I t could be a) true

Why is Magellan not worth defending?

Answers

Magellan wasn't worth defending because he burnt down a village and he killed people. he was also bad to his fleet. he yelled at them and forced them to eat food that was bad for them and has been sitting there for days. So those are a few reasons to why he didn't deserve someone defending him. <br />

Final answer:

Ferdinand Magellan is sometimes seen as controversial due to his attempts to convert locals to Christianity, the failure of his mission after his death, and the competition between Portugal and Spain that his route to the Spice Islands stirred. However, he is still remembered today with monuments and other references.

Explanation:

Saying Ferdinand Magellan is not worth defending could be related to various reasons. He attempted to convert people to Christianity in territories he discovered, which not everyone finds commendable. He pledged to assist Rajah Humabon, the ruler of Cebu, in defeating a rival ruler, Lapulapu, and lost his life in the Battle of Mactan. After his death, his remaining crew abandoned their mission in the Philippines and returned to Spain, suggesting a failure to establish lasting connections with the locals.

In seeking an alternate route to the Spice Islands, Magellan's funding came from the Spanish king after being turned down by the Portuguese. Despite his initial dreams, Magellan’s expedition led to conflict and competition between Portugal and Spain, culminating in the signing of the Treaty of Zaragoza in 1529 to divide Pacific territories between the two nations.

Despite the controversies, Magellan's legacy persists in today's world. Monuments and references to him exist in the Philippines and elsewhere. However, his actions during his expeditions might cause some to question whether he is worth defending.

Learn more about Ferdinand Magellan here:

brainly.com/question/18332808

#SPJ3

What did the term bread and circuses refer to during the time of the Roman emperors.

Answers

Bread and Circuses or Bread and games refers to a political term called appeasement - the phrase is used to describe the generation of public approval.

Answer:

C. Free bread and entertainment for the poor.

Explanation:

When the slaves took up all the jobs for the poor, the poor were getting mad. So the got free bread and entertainment to cool them down.