Which of the following is true of social contract theory? It views the consent of the people as the source of legitimate governmental authority. It views political power as being held by a few individuals in leadership positions in large businesses. It argues that public opinion should have a minimal influence on government policy. It played no role in the thinking of the founders of American democracy.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

it views the consent of people as the source of legitimate governmental authority

Explanation:

social contract theory is a theory that a theory modeled to checkmate the legitimacy of authority a state or country might have over its citizens/individuals residing in the state. This theory was developed during the enlightenment era .

In other to achieve its purpose it employs the use of the consent of people as the source to verify the legitimate governmental authorities over individuals in the society.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Social contract theory posits that the authority of a government is legitimate only if it comes from the consent of the governed. It played a significant role in the formation of American democracy, contrary to one of the given statements. The theory does not view political power as being held by leaders in big businesses, and it does not suggest that public opinion should minimally influence policy.

Explanation:

The social contract theory posits that the authority of a government is legitimate only if it is derived from the consent of the people, who willingly relinquish some of their freedoms in exchange for an organized society. Thus, the statement 'It views the consent of the people as the source of legitimate governmental authority' is true regarding social contract theory. This theory immensely influenced the architects of American democracy, contrary to the assertion that 'It played no role in the thinking of the founders of American democracy.'

In direct contradiction to social contract theory is the claim 'It views political power as being held by a few individuals in leadership positions in large businesses', which is an accurate description of an oligarchy or plutocracy, not social contract theory. Similarly, 'It argues that public opinion should have a minimal influence on government policy' goes against the core tenant of the social contract, which calls for government legitimacy through the consent of the governed.

Learn more about social contract theory here:

brainly.com/question/1985106

#SPJ3


Related Questions

Hellooooo, are these the correct choices?! Check my answers please!
Which citation below is typed in the correct APA reference style? a) Riggio, H.R., & Garcia, A.L. (2009). The Power of Situations: Jonestown and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 108-112. b) Riggio, H.R., & Garcia, A.L. (2009). The power of situations: Jonestown and the fundamental attribution error. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 108-112. c) Riggio, Heidi, & Garcia, Amber (2009). The power of situations: Jonestown and the fundamental attribution error. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 108-112. d) Riggio, H.R., & Garcia, A.L. (2009). The power of situations: Jonestown and the fundamental attribution error. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 108-112.
Onomatopoeia is word that sounds like what it means?
Which of the following is also called concurrent power? shared power separation of power bicameral legislature limited government
Describe the impact of the electoral college system on the outcome of the 2000 & 2016 elections.

Bettina was raised in a home where she and her brother were treated as equals by their parents-and their parents treated each other as equals. In fact, Bettina's mother had a more prestigious job and earned more money than her father, contrary to what society might expect. And this did not ruffle her father's feathers. Bettina never thought about any differences in what a boy or girl can or cannot do until she hit school age. And in school-gradually-she realized that in general the United States follows the tradition of a) a caste system. b) ascribed status. c) matriarchy. d) patriarchy

Answers

Answer:

d) Patriarchy

Explanation:

A caste system is based on the division of society into different social classes, in a hierarchichal way.

Ascribed status refers to the status who is beyond the individual's control.  It's based on age, birth, race, etc.

Matriarchy is a social system where women have the main power and control and have predominance in more social roles.

On the opposite hand, patriarchy is the social system where men are the ones holding control and who have predominance in the social roles.

According to the question, Bettina's mother had a more prestigious job and earned more money than her father which didn't bother any of them. However, it is mentioned that this situation is contrary to what society might expect and that is because, in general, the United States follows the tradition of patriarchy, where men are the ones holding control and have a predominant role in work, family, etc.

Which of the following statements is true of emotions in the workplace?(A) They are physiological action rather than behavioral action.
(B) Emotions lasts for a longer periods than moods.
(C) Emotions are directed toward someone or somethings
(D) They are also referred as a moods of individuals.
(E) Emotions and moods are directed toward specific attitudes of others.

Answers

Answer:

A) Emotions are directed toward someone or something.                              

Explanation:

Emotions: In psychology, the term emotion is referred to as a complex state of an individual's feelings that leads to psychological and physical changes that influence or alters his or her behaviors and thoughts.

Five common types of emotions in the workplace include dislike, anger, feeling down, worry or insecurity, and frustration.

Human emotions related to the workplace can lead to creating pragmatic benefits, for example, a happier workplace and better collaboration in-between employees. It causes a particular organization to communicate with the outside world or within itself.

Final answer:

Emotions are often directed towards specific people or events in the workplace. They are intense, short-lived responses to perceived events, and unlike moods, they usually motivate behavioral responses.

Explanation:

The statement that is true of emotions in the workplace is: (C) Emotions are directed toward someone or something. Emotions can be defined as intense, discrete, and brief responses to a particular event that is important to the individual. Unlike moods, which are less intense and often not directed or attached to anything specific, emotions usually arise in direct response to a perceived event, are short-lived (lasting minutes to hours), and usually motivate behavioral responses.

Emotions in the workplace can play a critical role in how team members interact with each other and contribute to the work environment. For example, positive emotions such as happiness or satisfaction can lead to increased productivity and improved interpersonal relationships at work. Conversely, negative emotions, like anger or frustration, can potentially lead to conflict and decreased work performance.

Learn more about Emotions in Workplace here:

brainly.com/question/31830635

#SPJ3

When creating the Executive Branch, what was the correct major concern of the delegates?They were concerned with putting too much power in the hands of a single person.



They were concerned with putting too much power in the hands of state governors.



They were concerned with putting too much power in the hands of the Supreme Court.



They were concerned with putting too much power in the hands of the Congress.

Answers

Answer:

They were concerned with putting too much power in the hands of a single person.

Explanation:

When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention gathered together in 1787, one of their major concerns had to do with the Executive Branch, that is, the President of the United States. The Convention was creating a federal power out of scratch, and because of their experience fighting against what they considered British tyranny, they wanted to preserve the sovereignty of the states and freedom of individuals from an opressive government.

The executive power was a major concern for them, as they felt putting too much power in the hands of a single person might lead to abuses of power and the establishment of a tyranny. Their solution was to split the government powers among three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. Through a system of checks and balances they would ensure none of them would become more powerful than the others.

How does the creation of the Department of Homeland Security affect resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations? Are there too few resources to fight both terrorists and traditional criminals? Who should pay the burden for investigating, apprehending, prosecuting, convicting, sentencing, and incarcerating terrorists? Should Osama Bin Laden have been taken alive? What are the due process protection questions in light of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security? Should these due process protections matter in the fight against terrorism?

Answers

Answer:

Throughout the settings page beneath, the definition including its represents the path is defined.

Explanation:

(1)

  • DHS becomes willing to take responsibility for counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, airport security, security policies, international security, management and compliance of certain immigration laws, the safety of our heads of government, vital infrastructure safety underneath the direction of the President, the United states department of defense seems to be the U.S. Federal Administrative Agency resp.
  • "The justice department must have been established after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, 2001, which slaughtered a" maximum of 2,977 civilians in New York City, from defending the President but stemming the influx of drugs across the border to stopping acts of violence but instead supporting neighborhoods recovering from natural calamities, all aspects of DHS become united throughout their attempt to promote the Homeland Security project. Including anywhere outside the villa in Shanks, Pennsylvania.

(2)

  • The U.S and the world organizations employ both military force and criminal enforcement devices during counterterrorism to work out their freedom of self-defense including, if conditions permit, to put the profession into disrepute. The latter aim seems to have been responsible for creating the multinational counter-terrorism alliance.
  • If captured, suspected terrorists could not be given concentration camp status, while formally recognized organized Taliban groups in Afghanistan would possibly apply for prison camp conditions.

(3)

  • The idea of violence as something of a means of political action originally came throughout the terror including its French Revolution, while the terrors of warfare but also criminal activity were already recognized since the beginning of human life.
  • By some of the end of the 19th century, "terrorism" applied almost entirely to something like the antigovernment brutality of organizations such as that of the Russian Narodnaya Volya, originally a term for both the barbaric abuses of power of a communist government. Since then, national expectations and priorities have differed in the classification of individual individuals and acts as terrorists.

(4)

Whether he is captured and tortured or becomes a live Muslim martyr, a sure kill towards him eventually getting out.

(5)

The due process seems to be the fundamental obligation that almost all of the fundamental rights granted to an individual must be upheld either by state. It safeguards and defends the private citizen from the force of the rule of the country.

Due process has often been viewed as prohibiting legislation as well as judicial prosecutions.

Final answer:

The Department of Homeland Security's creation strained resources for local crime-fighting but is vital in balancing threats. Investigations of high-profile terrorists like Osama Bin Laden involve many considerations. Lastly, due process protections are contentious in counter-terrorism efforts but are vital to uphold in the fight against terrorism.

Explanation:

The creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) affected resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations since a portion of funding had to be redirected toward combating terrorism. It's a balancing act to allocate resources between fighting terrorism and handling traditional crimes. Although it may strain resources, it is crucial to prioritize both. The federal government, through entities like the FBI and the DHS, typically bears the responsibility of investigating, apprehending, and prosecuting terrorists.

Concerning individuals such as Osama Bin Laden, decisions about their capture are complex and must take into account various elements like potential intelligence value, the risk to US forces, and international laws.

The creation of DHS raised due process protection questions because of the expanded powers it has to investigate and detain suspects of terrorism. Regardless of the severity of the crime, protecting due process rights is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. legal system. These protections should not be negated in the fight against terrorism; maintaining our principles is part of the fight against terrorism.

Learn more about Impact of Department of Homeland Security here:

brainly.com/question/32446016

#SPJ3

Do you think that white collar crimes is a problem in society? Why or why not? What do you think should be done to reduce white collar crimes?please help!​

Answers

Answer:

Yes, white collar crimes are a problem in society.

Explanation:

  • White collar crimes are a major problem to the society as it increases corruption and inefficiency in the society. A large portion of the society are victims of white collar crimes as those who involve in such crimes use and siphon funds and opportunity for their own personal purposes.
  • Most of these crimes involve amassing public funds, embezzlement, fraud, bribery, etc by the higher authorities or those in higher positions.
  • In order to reduce such crimes, the public should be vigilant and should demand for transparency in the public offices and businesses. It is important to implement an efficient prosecuting machinery in each district and state to prevent and punish every white collar criminals.
  • The most effective way tor reduce white collar crimes would be recruiting or employing accountable individuals with proficient qualities so that they would not engage in such crimes but instead work for the common good and development of all.

Final answer:

White collar crimes are a problem due to their significant financial, societal and institutional consequences. Reducing these crimes requires stronger regulations, stricter penalties and resource-infused legal systems.

Explanation:

White collar crimes, broadly defined as non-violent crimes committed by individuals or organizations in business environments, are indeed a problem in society. The main reason for this is that white collar crimes often involve deception, fraud, or breach of trust and can result in significant financial loss for individuals, companies, and even countries. Moreover, these crimes can have wider societal impacts, eroding trust in institutions and causing social harm.

In terms of what can be done to reduce white collar crimes, several strategies can be effective. First, there needs to be stronger and more detailed regulation of business and financial practices to prevent fraudulent activities. Second, enforcing stricter penalties for those convicted of white collar crimes can act as a deterrent. Finally, there is a need to invest more in law enforcement agencies and legal systems to ensure they have the resources to detect and prosecute these crimes effectively.

Learn more about White Collar Crimes here:

brainly.com/question/34654183

#SPJ3

Explain the KISS principle. Give an example of an actual situation where the KISS principle was ignored and the resulting consequences. Give an example of a real situation when the KISS principle was followed and the consequences.

Answers

Answer:

The KISS principle.

Keep It Simple, Stupid.

Explanation:

The KISS principle states that most systems work best if they are kept simple (not simpler) rather than if they are made complicated. That is to say that, simplicity should be the most important thing (key goal) in design, and unnecessary complexity should be avoided.

For example to persuade someone, use simple and clear language rather than complex big grammar(erudition). Use words that people will easily understand. Keep sentences short and straight to the point. Use straightforward sentence construction. If speaking to a group, speak so the person least likely to understand that way you would use the simplest of languages, thus making it possible for everyone to understand you.

An example of where the KISS principle was ignored:

A politician who wants to reform both tax and local services, and use the message, 'You pay your tax, we alleviate your poverty'.

Consequences: People may not comply because they don't understand what alleviation of poverty means.

An Example of where the KISS principle was followed and its consequences:

A marketer that works to find a simple message for promoting toothpaste and might come up with 'For a cleaner, brighter, happier life'.

Consequences: He will have more sells and more customers because everyone understands what he is talking about.

Answer:

Keep It Simple Stu.pid

Explanation: