Answer:
False
Explanation:
Answer:
The major principles of the United States Constitution - popular sovereignty, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review - are interconnected in a carefully designed system that aims to create a stable and just government.
1. **Popular Sovereignty**: Popular sovereignty is the idea that the ultimate authority rests with the people. It establishes that the government's power is derived from the consent of the governed. This principle is the foundational cornerstone of the entire Constitution because it empowers the citizens to participate in shaping their government.
2. **Federalism**: Federalism divides power between a central government and individual state governments. It creates a system of shared sovereignty where each level of government has distinct but interrelated roles. This principle prevents any one entity from amassing too much power and allows for localized governance to address specific regional needs.
3. **Separation of Powers**: The Constitution divides the federal government into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has separate powers and responsibilities to ensure that no single branch becomes too dominant. The legislative branch makes laws, the executive enforces them, and the judicial interprets them. This separation prevents tyranny and promotes accountability.
4. **Checks and Balances**: Checks and balances are mechanisms that each branch of government uses to limit the powers of the other branches. For example, the President can veto legislation passed by Congress,
Explanation:
Of course, let's simplify it further:
1. **Popular Sovereignty**: This means the government's power comes from the people. People elect leaders to represent them.
2. **Federalism**: It divides power between the big national government and smaller state governments. Both have their own jobs, like national defense and local laws.
3. **Separation of Powers**: The government is split into three parts - those who make laws, those who enforce laws, and those who judge if laws are fair. No one group can do everything.
4. **Checks and Balances**: Each part of the government can watch over the other parts and stop them from becoming too powerful. This makes sure they all follow the rules.
5. **Judicial Review**: Courts can say if something the government does goes against the rules in the Constitution. This keeps the government in line with the law.
So, these principles are like a set of rules that make sure the government works fairly, doesn't get too strong, and always listens to the people. They all fit together to create a balanced system of government in the United States.
men and children
women and children
men and women
Women and children Is the answer
violation of Free Speech.
The Sedition Act was indeed controversial because it restricted Free Speech during World War I. However, it was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, who reasoned that restricting speech during wartime is necessary for national security.
The Sedition Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1918 during World War I. This act made it illegal to speak or write anything critical of the government, the military, or the war effort. It was indeed controversial because it was seen as a violation of Free Speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the act was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v. United States in 1919. The court reasoned that during times of war, the government has the right to restrict speech that presents a clear and present danger to national security.
So, while the Sedition Act did limit Free Speech rights, it was considered acceptable under the circumstances of wartime. It was repealed in 1920 after the end of World War I and is often seen as an example of the tension between national security and civil liberties.
#SPJ6
The options of the question are, A) rules were established about how slaveholders could treat the enslaved workers. B) an enslaved person was defined as could be bought and sold. C) rules were established about how many hours enslaved people could work. D) an enslaved person was defined as someone that would work for a set number of years.
The correct answer is B) an enslaved person was defined as could be bought and sold.
An outcome of the slave codes in the Southern colonies in the 1600s was that an enslaved person was defined as could be bought and sold.
The fear of rebellion from the African American slaves made the white people pressure the Colonies to pass a law resctricting slaves actions. Those were the Slave Codes. These codes considered slaves as property, they were not allowed to own property, and could not assemble alone, just in the presence of a white person.
The United States would economically benefit from control of the canal zone.
Panama would become a protectorate of the United States.
The United States would eliminate the European financial presence in Central America.
(MC)Which of the following was a prominent argument used to support the United States’ acquisition of overseas territories during the late 19th century?
The United States had a divine destiny to dominate the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.
The United States needed access to raw materials and different regions for American-made goods.
The United States needed a colonial empire to provide men for military selection.
The United States was the only nation with the military power to stop the spread of communism in the developing world.
Points earned on this question: 0
Answer
Indentured servants and slaves were used.