Answer:
4all of the above are factors involved in judicial decision-making
Explanation:
The judge is the person who resolves a dispute or decides the fate of an accused, taking into account the evidence or evidence presented in a trial, administering justice. It is appropriate to distinguish the judge from the court, which is not legally a human being, but a judicial body composed of natural persons, who can rotate without violating this guarantee.
They are usually considered employees or public officials, although this will depend on the country in particular, are remunerated by the State (without prejudice to the figure of arbitrators and judges of peace), and integrate the so-called Judiciary. In general, they are characterized by their autonomy, independence and irremovability, without being able to be dismissed from their positions except for the causes established constitutionally or legally. They are also responsible for their ministerial, civil and criminal acts.
Answer:
By Providing legal aid to individuals filing civil rights laws
Explanation:
Answer:
By Providing legal aid to individuals filing civil rights laws
Explanation:
he was an antifederialist and opposed the constitution
Answer:
Pope Urban made a very public and urgent plea in 1095 to all of Christendom after receiving a letter from the Byzantine Emperor Alexis describing the increasing danger from the Seljuk Turks, Tartars from Asia, who had already conquered the caliphate of Baghdad in 1055 and now were seeking to expand their empire into the Holy Land. All of the history you have heard about the Crusades is so much hogwash:
from Seven Lies About Catholic History, by Diane Moczar
Unprovoked Muslim aggression in the seventh century brought large parts of the southern Byzantine Empire, including Syria, the Holy Land, and Egypt under Arab rule. Christians who survived the conquests found themselves subject to a special poll tax and discriminated against as an inferior class known as dhimmi. Often their churches were destroyed and other harsh conditions imposed. For centuries their complaints had been reaching Rome, but Europe was having its own Dark Age of massive invasion, and nothing could be done to relieve the plight of eastern Christians.
By the eleventh century, under the rule of a new Muslim dynasty, conditions worsened. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, site of the Crucifixion was destroyed, along with a large number of other churches, and Christian pilgrims were massacred. In 1067 a group of seven thousand peaceful German pilgrims lost two-thirds of their number to Muslim assaults. By this time the popes, including St. Gregory VII, were actively trying to rally support for relief of eastern Christians, though without success. It was not until the very end of the century, in 1095, that Pope Urban's address at Clermont in France met with a response-though not quite the one he had hoped for. But the response was what we now call the First Crusade.
"The general consensus of opinion among medievalists . . . is tha thte Crusades were military expeditions organized by the peoples of Western Christendom, notably the Normans and the French, under the leadership of the Roman Popes, for the recover of the Holy Places from their Muslim masters." This seems to sum up most neatly what the Crusades really were and how their participants actually viewed them. The Crusades were not colonialist or commercial ventures, they were not intended to force Christianity on Jews and Muslims, and they were not the projects of individual warlords. Their primary goal, in addition to the defense of the Eastern Empire, was the recovery of the Holy Land for Christendom, and they acknowledged the leadership of the Popes. As French historian Louis Brehier wrote, 'the popes alone understood the menace of Islam's progress for christian civilization.'"
Explanation:
No candidate won a majority of the popular vote.
B.
A third-party candidate won the election.
C.
The first African American president was elected.
D.
The first Catholic president was elected.
The state border between Arkansas and Mississippi
The state border between Texas and Oklahoma
The international border between Texas and Mexico
The international border between Montana and Canada
D. the international border between Montana and Canada
The international border between Montana and Canada is not defined by a natural boundary. The other borders are defined by rivers, thus representing natural boundaries.
A natural boundary is a geographic feature which separates different regions. When looking at the options given, the international border between Montana and Canada is not defined by a natural boundary. The other options — the state border between Arkansas and Mississippi, the state border between Texas and Oklahoma, and the international border between Texas and Mexico — are defined by natural boundaries (the Mississippi River, the Red River, and the Rio Grande respectively).
#SPJ2