Answer:
False
Explanation:
Interpersonal communication can be used for mass communication, but mass communication cannot be used for interpersonal purposes. While interpersonal communication involves communication between individuals, mass communication involves communication to a large audience through various channels such as television, radio, and the internet. However, interpersonal communication can also intersect with mass communication, as individuals can use social media platforms to communicate with a large audience
Answer:
Speed limits is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Basic speed law tells about the speed which is safe for driving. It sets the maximum or minimum speed limit at which road vehicles can travel. They are meant to regulate public behaviours and regulate the unreasonable behaviour. They are mostly indicated on the traffic signs and reflect the maximum or minimum speed limits in kilometres per hour or miles per hour. Legislative or local government set the limits and are enforced by regional or national police. It is unlimited in some places such as autobahn in Germany.
The most challenging information for William, a 75-year-old active retiree, to remember is likely new, complex, or unrelated information. This is due to age-related cognitive decline, which affects memory retention and the ability to learn new things.
As individuals age, they may experience a decline in their cognitive abilities, particularly in the areas of working memory and episodic memory. Working memory is responsible for temporarily holding and processing information, while episodic memory is responsible for storing and recalling events from one's personal past. Both of these memory types are crucial for learning and retaining new information.
William's physical fitness is a positive factor, as it has been shown that staying active can help maintain cognitive health. However, his age still makes it more difficult for him to retain new information compared to younger individuals. Strategies that can help improve memory retention include repetition, relating new information to prior knowledge, and organizing information into meaningful categories or associations.
To know more about information click here
#SPJ11
Answer:
B.) White males who owned at least 50 acres of land
Male and female landowners of at least 18 years of age were permitted to vote in Assembly elections under Georgia's new legislature.
The answer to the question is option d. Male and female landowners of at least 18 years of age were permitted to vote in Assembly elections under Georgia's new legislature.
Prior to the 1820s, many state constitutions imposed property qualifications for voting, but as Federalist ideals fell out of favor, there was an increasing push for universal manhood suffrage. Over time, voting rights expanded to include all White male citizens regardless of property ownership. It wasn't until later, in 1920, that the 19th Amendment secured full suffrage for women.
This expansion of suffrage was influenced by various factors such as the abolition of property qualifications, recognition of voting rights regardless of race through the 15th Amendment, the fight for women's suffrage, and the lowering of the voting age to 18 with the 26th Amendment.
#SPJ11
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Instead of giving Congress additional powers, the Supremacy Clause simply addresses the legal status of the laws that other parts of the Constitution empower Congress to make, as well as the legal status of treaties and the Constitution itself. The core message of the Supremacy Clause is simple: the Constitution and federal laws (of the types listed in the first part of the Clause) take priority over any conflicting rules of state law. This principle is so familiar that we often take it for granted. Still, the Supremacy Clause has several notable features.
To begin with, the Supremacy Clause contains the Constitution’s most explicit references to what lawyers call “judicial review”—the idea that even duly enacted statutes do not supply rules of decision for courts to the extent that the statutes are unconstitutional. Some scholars say that the Supremacy Clause’s reference to “the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance [of the Constitution]” itself incorporates this idea; in their view, a federal statute is not “made in Pursuance [of the Constitution]” unless the Constitution really authorizes Congress to make it. Other scholars say that this phrase simply refers to the lawmaking process described in Article I, and does not necessarily distinguish duly enacted federal statutes that conform to the Constitution from duly enacted federal statutes that do not. But no matter how one parses this specific phrase, the Supremacy Clause unquestionably describes the Constitution as “Law” of the sort that courts apply. That point is a pillar of the argument for judicial review. In addition, the Supremacy Clause explicitly specifies that the Constitution binds the judges in every state notwithstanding any state laws to the contrary.