Answer:
Explanation:
Not always. In fact, there have been
four presidential elections in which
the winner did not receive a majority
of the popular vote. The first of these was
John Quincy Adams in the election of 1824, and the
most recent occurred in 2000 in the presidential race
between george w. Bush and Al gore.
How does this happen?
The answer lies in the “Electoral College.” The
drafters of the U.S. Constitution sought to create a
system that balanced the interests of the (then) 13 states
and those of the American people. voters chose the
members of the House of representatives, but state
legislatures (also elected by the people) elected
U.S. senators. And states sent delegates to a body—
the Electoral College—that chose the president and Americans later amended the Constitution
to make the system more democratic. Beginning
in 1913, U.S. senators were elected directly by the
people. And while the Electoral College still officially
elects the president, the people choose the Electoral
College members.
Here’s how it works.
After the nationwide presidential election is held
in November, the Electoral College meets in december.
In most states, electors cast their votes based on how
the majority of voters in their state voted. The electors
vote in their states on december 15, and Congress
officially counts the results in January.
Each state has a number of electors equal to the
number of its members in the U.S. House of representatives—determined by a census of the the state’s population, plus its two senators. The district of Columbia,
which is not a state and has no voting representation
in Congress, has three Electoral College votes.
There are 538 electors in the Electoral
College; 270 electoral votes are needed to
win the presidential election.
most states award electoral votes on a
winner-take-all basis. The presidential ticket that
gets the most citizens’ votes receives all that state’s
electoral votes. Two states—Nebraska and maine—have experimented
with awarding their electoral votes proportionately
based on citizens’ votes. presidential election strategy
consists of “carrying” a combination of states that
adds up to 270 electoral votes. Election results can
turn on the electoral votes in a handful of competitive
state races.
one consequence of the winner-take-all system
is that a candidate can win the most votes nationally
but lose the election.
Imagine that a candidate wins a state by a small
margin and that state has a lot of electoral votes. That
candidate would still receive all of the electoral votes.
So if a candidate wins in California by a small margin,
they get all 55 of California’s electoral votes. That same
candidate may lose in other, smaller states by large
margins and receive fewer popular votes than his
or her opponent. But that candidate would still have
the edge in the Electoral College. I hoped it's helps .
A presidential candidate can win the most popular votes but not win the election due to the operation of the U.S. Electoral College. In most states, whoever wins the most votes secures all of that state's electoral votes (winner-take-all system).
The reason why a presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes might not win the election is due to the operation of the U.S. Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of people known as electors who are indirectly selected to vote for the president. The winning candidate only needs to secure a majority of these electoral votes, not the majority of a nationwide popular vote.
For example, in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, garnering over 2.9 million more nationwide votes than Donald Trump. However, Trump won more electoral votes because he received the majority of votes in several key states, a reflection of the winner-take-all system employed by most states. This system means the candidate with the most votes in a state wins all of the state's electoral votes.
U.S. elections are based on plurality voting, a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes wins. A candidate does not necessarily need to receive 51% (a majority) of the total votes. Cases also exist where votes for third party candidates draw sufficient votes away from a major candidate, altering the distribution of electoral votes. In sum, the U.S. Electoral College and the winner-take-all voting system can result in scenarios where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the popular vote.
#SPJ2
Civic rights, seemed fair because they formulated the rights that protect individual freedoms from their illegal breakdown (repression) by the power (be it that of governments or any other public or private political agent), and guarantee the citizen's capacity to participate in the civil and political life of the State in conditions of equality, and without discrimination.
Answer:
The Puritan argued that the selection of the date was an early Christian hijacking of a Roman festival, and to celebrate a December Christmas was to defile oneself by paying homage to a pagan custom.
Explanation:
Sorry for the lame explanation ;)
Answer:2.6 million years ago to 8000BC
Explanation:
Answer:
The Paleolithic coincides almost exactly with the Pleistocene epoch of geologic time, which lasted from 2.6 million years ago to about 12,000 years ago.
Explanation:read in a history text book
One of the effect of the British threatening to hang leaders of southern communities and destroy their land was the Benin Expedition of 1897.
The Britishers were the European people who came to another country in order to trade and acquire the political power. They were the immigrants to a new area with the support of the government. They are also referred as the settlers in the new region.
The British policy that led American colonists to create their own country was because Great Britain did not let colonists participate in administration.
The Benin Mission of 1897 was a disciplinary expedition led by Sir Harry Rawson with a force of 1,200 troops in reaction to the assault of a previous British group led by Acting Consul General James Phillips of the Niger Coast Protectorate.
Rawson's men conquered and sacked Benin City, thereby ending the Kingdom of Benin, which was later annexed by colonial Nigeria.
Therefore, it can be concluded that The Benin Expedition of 1897 was one of the consequences of the British vowing to hang leaders of southern towns and destroy their land.
Learn more about Britishers here:
#SPJ2
Answer: King philip's war
Explanation:
Prince henry the navigator. Glad to help :)