Answer:
hi
Explanation:
A. He plans to get rid of the nose instead of giving it back to
Kovaloff.
In Nikolai Gogol's 'The Nose', the fact that Ivan Jakovlevitch turns in the nose to the police and immediately gets arrested is evidence that suggests he is often wrongfully blamed for things.
The statement that gives an inference that Ivan Jakovlevitch is often blamed for things that are not his fault in 'The Nose' by Nikolai Gogol is: 'He turns the nose into the police and is immediately arrested.' This choice suggests that he is wrongly blamed because even though he tries to do the right thing by handing in the nose to the police, he still ends up getting into trouble. Therefore, this incident implies that Jakovlevitch frequently becomes a victim of blame, even when he is not at fault.
#SPJ2
2.statistical
3.anecdotal
A. 1 only
B. 1 and 2
C. 2 and 3
D. 1, 2,and 3
The correct option is letter C. I am interested in drawing, painting, and making sculptures.
This is the best option as it follows the principle of parallelism in sentences which states all words within a listing should belong to the same word type. In this case, the original sentence stated two ideas as gerunds (drawing, painting) and a last one in the base form of the verb (make sculptures) which went against said principle.
5 However, we must take into consideration the claims that too many rules actually encourage shady promoters to arrange unsanctioned “no holds barred” matches. Serious injuries would increase. Without a doubt, fans are drawn to the battles. But most fans share an esprit de corps. They are interested in a fair fighting match to determine physical and strategic superiority. The thrill is cheering for the best fighter, the one who can adapt to any style the opponent uses. So, of course, common rules like addressing time limits and weight classes are important areas for continued regulation. This will help keep the fights fair.
A student read this passage and made the following assertion about section five:
Serious injuries occur during unsanctioned matches.
Therefore:
All injuries occur during unsanctioned matches.
Which BEST describes the student's reasoning?
A) The statements employ valid reasoning.
B) The statements employ sound reasoning.
C) The statements employ deductive reasoning.
D) The statements employ inductive reasoning.
Answer:
D) The statements employ inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Before explanation, let's first quickly define the given choices.
Valid reasoning is the correct conclusion made from correct premises.
Sound reasoning is the resoning that can be fairly easily understood and that follows some sort of logic.
Deductive reasoning is the reasoning from the general to the specific.
Inductive reasoning is the reasoning from the specific to the general.
Unlike deductive, inductive reasoning can lead us to wrong conclusions. It starts with a specific observations and from them conclude a general rule.
In this case, the observation is that serious injuries occur during unsanctioned matches. Using inductive reasoning, we could make the general rule that all the injuries occur during unsanctioned matches, however, it, obviously, might not be true.
Answer:
The answer for this problem is
C) Most fans want to witness the raw and brutal battles of "no holds barred" matches, and don't care about proper enforcement of the rules.
A.
your
B.
you'r
C.
you're
Answer:
My friends cheered as I scored the winning goal.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer: B
Hope this helps :D