Answer:
5.56%
Explanation:
Computation for holding-period return
Using this formula
Holding-period return =(Stock sales- Purchased Share + Dividend)/Purchased share
Let plug in the formula
Where,
Stock sales=92
Purchased Share=90
Dividend=3
Holding-period return=(92 - 90 + 3) / 90
Holding-period return=5/90
Holding-period return=0.0556×100
Holding-period return= 5.56%
Therefore the Holding-period return will be 5.56%
B) 2.66 million
C) 60.38 million
D) 8.18 million
Answer:
D) 8.18 million
Explanation:
EBIT=80-52
=$28 million
EVA=net operating profit after tax-(capital invested×WACC)
=$28 m (1-0.4)-($115 m ×.075)
=$8.18 million
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future value= $3,000
Number of periods= 15 years
I will assume an interest rate of 8% compounded annually.
To calculate the present value (PV), we need to use the following formula:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 3,000/1.08^15
PV= $945.73
Income from continuing operations is $61,011 $41,226
Current Year Previous Year
Revenues:
Admissions 20.28≅ 20.3 20.81 ≅20.8
Event-related revenue 29.61 ≅ 29.6 30.32≅30.3
NASCAR broadcasting revenue 43.80≅ 43.8 42.82≅42.8
Other operating revenue 6.31 ≅ 6.3 6.05≅6.1
Total revenues 100% 100%
Expenses and other:
Direct expense of events 21.01 ≅ 21.0 21.10≅ 21.1
NASCAR event management fees 29.61≅ 29.6 26.48≅ 26.5
Other direct expenses 3.94 ≅ 3.9 3.82≅3.8
General and administrative 35.84 ≅ 35.8 40.08≅40.1
Total expenses and other 87.72 ≅ 87.7 91.49≅ 91.5
Income from continuing operations 12.23% 8.51%
Vertical Analysis =(Income Statement Item/ Sales )*100
We prepared a comparative income statement for these two years in vertical form, stating each item as a percent of revenues.
Current Year Previous Year
Revenues:
Admissions $100,694 $100,798
Event-related revenue 146,980 146,849
NASCAR broadcasting revenue 217,469 207,369
Other operating revenue 31,320 29,293
Total revenues $496,463 $484,309
Expenses and other:
Direct expense of events $104,303 $102,196
NASCAR event management fees 133,682 128,254
Other direct expenses 19,541 18,513
General and administrative 177,926 194,120
Total expenses and other $435,452 $443,083
Income from continuing operations $61,011 $41,226
The complete question is Vertical Analysis of Income Statement The following comparative income statement (in thousands of dollars) for two recent fiscal years was adapted from the annual report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc., owner and operator of several major motor speedways, such as the Atlanta, Texas, and Las Vegas Motor Speedways. Current Year Previous Year Revenues: Admissions $100,694 $100,798 Event-related revenue 146,980 146,849 NASCAR broadcasting revenue 217,469 207,369 Other operating revenue 31,320 29,293 Total revenues $496,463 $484,309 Expenses and other: Direct expense of events $104,303 $102,196 NASCAR event management fees 133,682 128,254 Other direct expenses 19,541 18,513 General and administrative 177,926 194,120 Total expenses and other $435,452 $443,083 Income from continuing operations $61,011 $41,226 a. Prepare a comparative income statement for these two years in vertical form, stating each item as a percent of revenues. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. (Note: Due to rounding, amounts may not total 100%). Round your percentages to one decimal place.
To learn more about income statement refer to:
#SPJ4
The comparative income statement for Speedway motorsports Inc. over several fiscal years gives insights into revenue, costs, and profit trends. Increasing revenues coupled with increasing costs might indicate a need for cost efficiency, while a higher rate of profit growth compared to revenues could suggest effective cost management.
The question refers to a comparative income statement of Speedway Motorsports, Inc., a major operator of motor speedways. A comparative income statement compares the income statements of a company across several fiscal years. This can provide valuable insights into how revenues, costs, and profits are developing over time, and thus give indications of how the company's business model is working and where there might be room for improvements.
For example, if Speedway Motorsports' income statements show increasing revenues but also increasing costs, it might indicate that they need to work on cost efficiency. Alternatively, if profits are increasing faster than revenues, it could suggest that their cost management is effective.
#SPJ12
Answer:
b. debit to Loss on Bond Retirement of $1,000.
Explanation:
Options are "A. credit to Gain on Bond Retirement of $1,000. B. debit to Loss on Bond Retirement of $1,000. C. debit to Bonds Payable of $101,000. D. credit to Cash of $100,000."
When a bond is retired before maturity a gain or loss may arise. In such case if the price paid to retire the bonds is greater the carrying amount of bonds then the company need to record a loss on retirement in the book. On the other hand if the price paid is less than the carrying amount of the bonds at retirement, then the company records a gain on retirement of bonds.
Answer:
1998, 1999, 2000:
Index value : -4.840, -4.840, -4.840
Days Receivable Index : 0.7243, 1.0546, 1.2562
Gross Margin Index : 0.5640, 0.4513, 0.2463
Asset Quality Index : 0.4293, 0.4300, 0.3116
Sales Growth Index : 1.3594, 1.1446, 2.2413
Depreciation Index : 0.1160, 0.1151, 0.0908
Selling & Admin Expense Index : 0.1962, 0.1650, -0.0716
Leverage Index : -0.2720, -0.2453, -0.3656
Total Accruals to Total Assets: -0.1491, -0.0285, -0.2709
Probability using norms-dist: 1.8% , 1.86%, 8.05%
Explanation:
Beneish's earning manipulation model is used to ascertain the probability of manipulation in the financial data. In this model ratio are calculated and then their index is identified to know an indication of possibility of fraud. In the given scenario the probability of manipulation is too high. The data is assessed through applying beneish model to understand actual financial position of the company.
Answer:
If disposable income increases by $5 billion and consumer spending ... spending by $100 billion and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. ... Suppose investment spending increases by $50 billion, and as a result real GDP increases by $200 billion. ... deliberate changes in taxation and/or government spending.
Explanation: