You have stopped for a train at a railroad crossing that is marked with a Crossbuck sign. When the train has passed, A: You should wait until the departing train is at least 500 feet from the crossing before proceeding. B: You must not proceed until you are sure there are no other trains approaching on any of the tracks. C: You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing.

What is the first thing an evidence analyst is likely to be asked in court?

Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.

There arecolors used to produce seven different types of traffic signs,
a) 7
b) 8
c) 9
d) 10

Against utilitarianism, which of the following authors would object, “To maximize utility by imposing burdens on some individuals is to treat all of society like a single person. But society is not like a single person, and so utilitarianism is mistaken.

A mandatory airbag law ends up raising the number of traffic fatalities if it lowers fatalities per accident from 0.05 to 0.03 while raising the number of accidents per period from 25,000 to any more than around __________________ accidents per period. a.43,500
b.38,500
c.57,450
d.41,667

John owned an apartment and leased it to Steve. The lease agreement was for one year. After ten months, Steve told John that he was moving out of the apartment immediately. When John went to the apartment, he saw that Steve had put holes in the walls, ruined the carpets, and damaged the wiring. John was told that repairs would take at least two months. John sued Steve for damage to the apartment and for the rent payments for the last two months of the lease. Steve argues that the remaining rent owed should be offset by John's duty to find another tenant and mitigate his damages. The court would most likely rule in favor of(a) Steve, because John had a duty to mitigate his damages(b) John, because Steve argued against his recovery in their dispute(c) Steve, because John could have rented the apartment "as is"(d) John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to the damage