Answer:
It was written in plain language.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Yangtze
Euphrates
Indus
Private companies and independent firms believe that the TVA is a government-run monopoly selling electricity in bulk at low rates making it difficult for them to compete with the TVA. Apart from that their low rates enable them to be spared from taxation.
c. Manipulativeness
b. Cunning
d. Mercifulness
b. Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature.
c. Established the Indian Territory east of the Mississippi in present-day Oklahoma.
d. Declared that the US government would honor the Cherokee Nation's constitution.
The Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it struck down the laws created by the Georgian legislature.
Further Explanation:
Worcester V Georgia (1832) abandoned the judgement of Samuel Worcester by Supreme Court. It also held the Georgia criminal statute which was forbidding non-Native Americans to live on Americans native land without license. It was unconstitutional.
Samuel Austin Worcester was translator of Bible, protector of the Cherokee'ssovereignty and a missionary to Cherokee He made collaboration with Elias Boudinot to establish the Cherokee Phoenix, first American newspaper in vernacular language. Migration of European American settlers from coastal areas towards Cherokee territory even after making land cessions to the US government became prevalent. Worchester and his sponsor plotted to fight against the encroachment through court. They even want to take the case to the Supreme Court to explain the relation between the federal and the state government to establish the sovereignty of Cherokee nation.
Ex- U.S Attorney General, William Writ argued their position in US Supreme court. Cherokee Nation was described as a domestic dependent nation with no authority binding on a state by Chief Justice Marshall.
Worcester along with other eleven missionaries protested and published a resolution against the Georgia Law in1830 forbidding white men from living on the land of America without state license. According to the Worcester by obeying this law they will be compromising their sovereignty. After implementation of the law, Worcester and many others were charged for disobeying the law. They refuse to get the license.
Learn more:
1. DoesSupreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had in Furman v. Georgia (1972)? brainly.com/question/2816742
2. The Supreme Court is best characterized as?brainly.com/question/407715
Answer Details:
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: Georgia Legislature
Keywords: Worcester V Georgia, Samuel Worcester, Supreme Court, Georgia, Native American, Samuel Austin Worcester, Cherokee’s sovereignty, Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Phoenix, U.S Attorney General, William Writ
Answer: B. struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands
Explanation: The decision in Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation because it struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands. Judge John Marshall wrote that the Indian Nations were independent political communities entitled to their own natural rights.
B. differences in the size of states.
C.opposition to the Louisiana Purchase.
D.differences in regional economies
The correct answer is D: Differences in regional economies:
The United States was primarily agricultural in the years before , during and immediately after the civil war. About three quarters of the population lived in rural areas, including farms and small towns. Nevertheless, the Industrial Revolution that had hit England decades before , established itself in the "former colonies".
While factories were built in the North and South, the vast majority of industrial manufacturing was taking place in the north. The South had almost 25% of the country's free population , but only 10% of the country capital in 1860. The North had five times the number of factories as the South and over ten times the number of factory workers. 90% of the nation's skilled workers were in the North.
In the North, labor was expensive and workers were mobile and active. The influx of immigrants from Europe provided competition in the labor market.
Te South economy, however, was built on the labor of African slaves, who were oppressed into providing cheap labor.
A critical economic issue that divided the south and the north was that of tariffs. Tariffs were taxes placed on imported goods, the money from which would go to the government. Whenever the federal government wanted to raise tariffs, Southern Congressmen generally opposed it and Northern Congressmen generally supported it . Southerners generally favored low tariffs because this kept the cost of imported goods low, which was important in the south's import- oriented economy.
In the North, however, high tariffs were viewed favorably because such tariffs would make imported goods more expensive. That way, goods produced in the North would seem relatively cheap, and Americans would want to buy American goods instead of European items. Since tariffs would protect domestic industry from foreign competition.
Americans in the West were divided on the issue . In the Southwest, where cotton was primarily a commodity , people generally promoted low tariffs . In the Northwest and parts of Kentucky, where hemp was a big crop , people supported high tariffs.