WITH GRAPHWhat is the y-intercept of this line? A. (-2,0) B. (0,-2) C. (0,1) D. (1,0)
WITH GRAPH What is the y-intercept of this line? A. - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

(0, -2) (Answer B)

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that the y-axis represents x = 0.  The blue line crosses (intercepts) the y-axis when x = 0.  The corresponding y-coordinate is -2.  Thus, the y-intercept is (0, -2), or just -2.


Related Questions

How to find the value of x
Line p is parallel to line q. Parallel lines p and q are crossed by lines a and b to form 2 triangles. At parallel line p, angle 4 is formed by line b and angle 5 is formed by line a. Angle 6 is the third angle. At parallel line q, angle 3 is formed by line 3 and angle 2 is formed by line b. Angle 1 is the third angle. Which set of statements about the angles is true? Angle 1 is congruent to angle 6, angle 5 is congruent to angle 4, angle 3 is congruent to angle 2 Angle 2 is congruent to angle 4, angle 3 is congruent to angle 6, angle 1 is congruent to angle 5 Angle 3 is congruent to angle 6, angle 1 is congruent to angle 2, angle 5 is congruent to angle 4 Angle 6 is congruent to angle 1, angle 5 is congruent to angle 3, angle 4 is congruent to angle 2
Divide and simplify to the form a+bi. 5+6i 5+6i 6+ i (Simplify your answer. Type an integer or a fraction. Type your answer in the form a+bi.)
Consider the matrix shown below:
A motorboat moves across a lake. It begins at 50km from shore after 9 minutes it is 14 km from shore. What’s it’s distance from shore in a function

Fill in the missing numbers to complete the linear equation that gives the rule for this table.

Answers

Answer:

y = -2x + -17

Step-by-step explanation:

Adrian shops for school clothes and spends a total of $93.42. If the local tax rate is 8%, how much was the cost without taxes?

Answers

Based on the amount that Adrian spent in total, the cost without taxes was $86.50.

The cost of the clothes was $93.42 including tax.

Assuming the original cost is x, the equation is:

Total cost = Original cost x ( 1 + tax)

Solving would give:

93.42 = x × (1 + 8%)

93.42 = 1.08x

x = 93.42 / 1.08

= $86.50

In conclusion, the cost without taxes was $86.50.

Find out more at brainly.com/question/17836987.

Answer:

85.95

Step-by-step explanation:

If the local tax was 8% and we want to know what is was without the tax then we need to do 93.42 times .92

93.42*.92=85.9464

Since money only goes to the hundredths place we need to round there

85.95

Arc Length and Radians question- please help! Will mark brainliest! Is 20pts!The answer is shown but please give me an explanation so I can show my work!

Answers

Answer:

59

Step-by-step explanation:

If we convert from degrees into radians, we can use the formula

s=r\theta, where s is the arc length, r is the radius and θ is the angle in radians.

To convert from degrees to radians, we multiply by (\pi)/(180)

So (140 \pi)/(180) is our angle in radians, and we have the radius - we can now plug in these two values into our equation.

s=24*(140 \pi)/(180) =58.64

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

length of arc= (arc angle/360) * 2πr

length= 140/360 *2*22/7*24

length=58.88 feet ~59 feet(approx)

Find the distance between the two numbers on the number
line.

Answers

Answer:

3 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

|-7| - |-3 1/2| = 3 1/2

Freida drove 18 miles in 24 minutes. At this rate, how many miles did she drive in 6 minutes?

Answers

Answer:

4.5

Step-by-step explanation: you divide 24 by what you do  to get 6 which is 4 then you use 4 to divide 18 which is 4.5 or 4 and a half. Have A Great Day!

In the 1980s land prices in Japan surged upward in a ""speculative bubble."" Land prices then fell for 11 straight years between 1990 and 2001. What can we safely assume happened to land rent in Japan over those 11 years? Use graphical analysis to illustrate your answer.

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the supply of land is perfectly inelastic, the drop in prices must have resulted from decreased demand for land. The demand for land would fall if there were less of a return on the land (i.e., rent), so we can safely assume that land rent fell in Japan between 1990 and 2001. The shifts from D3 to D2 to D1 demonstrate graphically what happened in Japan.