the answer is thesis !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
b) persuade Congress that going to war with the Japanese is necessary
c) engage the audience by providing examples of the violence of the attack
d) persuade Congress and the American people that becoming involved in the war is a bad idea in spite of the attacks on Pearl Harbor
2. Write down three examples that help support your answer to the purpose of Roosevelt's speech
Answer:
Knowledge is not always clear, certain, and absolute, and it is not solely provided by authorities. While authorities can provide valuable information, it is important to approach knowledge with critical thinking and skepticism. Our role as learners is to evaluate the information we receive, question it, and analyze it for its validity and reliability.
Here are a few key points to consider:
1. Knowledge is not always clear: Knowledge can be complex and multifaceted, and it may not always have a straightforward answer. It can be subject to interpretation, and different perspectives can exist on a given topic. It is important to be open to different viewpoints and consider various sources of information.
2. Knowledge is not always certain: Many fields of study, such as science, involve theories that are constantly evolving as new evidence emerges. What may be considered true today may be refined or even challenged in the future. It is essential to embrace a growth mindset and be open to updating our understanding as new information becomes available.
3. Knowledge is not always absolute: Absolute knowledge implies that there is no room for doubt or further exploration. However, knowledge should be seen as a continuous process of inquiry and discovery. It is important to engage in critical thinking and question the information we receive, even if it comes from authoritative sources.
4. Authorities are not infallible: While authorities can provide valuable insights and expertise, they are not immune to errors or biases. It is crucial to critically evaluate the credentials and reliability of the sources we rely on. This can involve cross-referencing information, seeking diverse perspectives, and considering the evidence and logic behind the claims being made.
5. Constructive skepticism is essential: It is healthy to question and critically examine information, even if it comes from authoritative sources. By doing so, we can deepen our understanding, identify potential biases or errors, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.
In summary, knowledge is not always clear, certain, and absolute, and it should not be accepted without question or criticism. Our role as learners is to approach knowledge with an open mind, engage in critical thinking, and evaluate the information we receive from various sources, including authorities. By doing so, we can develop a well-rounded understanding and contribute to the growth of knowledge.
Explanation:
Knowledge is not always absolute or only provided by authorities. Critical thinking, scientific inquiry, and the ability to analyze and assess information independently are equally important. Questioning authorities does not necessarily equate to being wrong, but can instead lead to progress and refinement of knowledge.
The assertion that knowledge is absolute, provided only by authorities, and must be accepted without criticism proposes a conventional perspective towards authority in education or governance. However, this viewpoint is debatable and not universally accepted. Indeed, authorities such as teachers or government officials do have an important role in disseminating knowledge, as they often possess expertise and credible information. Nevertheless, critical thinking – the ability to question, analyze, and assess information or arguments – is equally important.
Knowledge may not always be absolute, especially in disciplines that evolve and advance over time, like science. As we acquire more information and conduct further research, previously accepted premises or theories may be disproved or refined. For instance, centuries ago, accepted knowledge asserted that Earth was flat and the Sun circled around it. Through scientific inquiry and observation, however, these concepts were revised and corrected.
Moreover, whether a statement can be deemed true or credible does not only depend on who utters it, but also on whether it can be backed up by tangible evidence and sound reasoning. This can be seen in the scientific approach, which emphasizes experimentation, observation, and verification. Therefore, questioning or disagreeing with authorities does not necessarily equate to being wrong; it can instead lead to constructive debate, progress, and innovation.
#SPJ11
b. Experiences rooted in history
c. Collective experiences
d. Individual experiences
What kind of experience did the Romantics MOSTLY write about? d. Individual experiences
b. Raoul hasn't been able to keep up with his courses, because he took on too many extracurricular activities.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Which statement best describes how the author structures the passage?
He uses logos to convince the reader of his point.
He uses pathos to engage the reader emotionally.
He uses positive connotations to amuse the reader.
He uses negative connotations to frighten the reader.
Answer: He uses pathos to engage the reader emotionally.
In this excerpt, the author uses pathos in order to engage with the reader emotionally. His claim presents several different, but related, emotions, such as the "general appetite for procreation" and the "more exact sympathy." The author is trying to engage the reader emotionally by describing these feelings and trying to explain their origin.