In 'Lord Arthur Savile's Crime', Lord Arthur's reconciliation with a predicted murder comes from consciously attempting to commit it on his terms, adding to the comedy of the text by wildly subverting expectations.
In Oscar Wilde’s short story 'Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime', Lord Arthur is initially troubled by a palmist's prediction that he would commit a murder. The comedy in the text arises from his unconventional approach to resolving this conflict. Instead of dismissing the prediction or feeling guilty, he decides to fulfill it strategically by attempting to murder an old woman, which he deems as harmless as possible, given her age, to be able to live his life without the looming threat of unintentionally committing a crime.
This ironic response adds to Wilde’s satirical commentary, poking fun at the class dynamics, and creates comedy in the text. Lord Arthur’s determination to commit a murder that is prophesied to occur accidentally demonstrates the humorous inversion of expected behaviors.
#SPJ3
Students would be admired and well paid.
Students would have to follow strict procedures.
Teachers would be admired and well paid.
Teachers would have to follow strict procedures.
Answer:
The answer is C. Teachers would be admired and well paid.
Explanation: Answer on EDGE
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
My class teacher is Mrs Shelly Roy. Her first duty in the morning is to call the rolls. She maintains the attendance register. She ensures that students follow proper discipline. She teaches us English and History. She takes surprise tests and evaluates our understanding of concepts. She prepares the report cards and during the Parent Teacher Meeting, she tells our parents about our performance and behaviour in class. She is strict but I like her.
Explanation:
Sentence 2 should be revised to read, “After that I will stop at Lancer’s Diner for some homemade cherry pie.”
Sentence 3 should be revised to read, “My next stop will be old Mr. Butterworth’s for a chat with my favorite neighbor.”
Sentence 4 should be revised to read, “My last stop will be the house in which I grew up to see who lives there now.”
The revision that must be made to ensure that the given sentences contain a parallel structure would be as follows:
C). Sentence 3 should be revised to read, “My next stop will be old Mr Butterworth’s for a ch-at with my favorite neighbor.”
Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Revision" here:
In order to maintain the parallel structure sentence (3) should be revised to read, “My next stop will be old Mr. Butterworth’s for a chat with my favourite neighbour.”
In this passage each sentence starts in a similar way as the author has decided to list each activity he/she will do in his/her visit to the home town by using “My first stop….”, “My second stop….”, ““My next stop….” and “My last stop…” at the beginning of each sentence. In addition, the writer resorts to the simple future tense when he/she says what he/she will do in each stop and then he/she adds the purpose of theses action.
For example: “…., my first stop will be my uncle’s old gas station to fill the car”. In this fragment, the author starts his/her list of activities with the phrase “my first stop”, then he/she continues with a simple future tense to explain what he/she is going to do “will be my uncle’s old gas station” and finally he says the aim of this stop “to fill the car”. This grammatical structure is repeated in the subsequent sentences.
C i passed
Answer:
The main idea of the text 'The Case Against Torture' is that maltreatment is being carried out in the country against the Constitution of the country.
Explanation:
"The Case Against Torture" is a persuasive essay written by Alisa Solomon. The essay was written to bring to light the tortures being carried by the Government against the Constitution of the United States.
In her essay she asserts how the government non-citizens of America in jail and not only just keep them there but also how they torture them to get the information from the suspected criminals. They have used to mean of torture to get the information from them, which is also against the U.S. Constitution and also against thhe UN Convention.
The main critique against torture includes the human rights violations and constitutional breaches that occur during inhumane treatment of detainees, particularly in the context of the war on terror, which has damaged America's global standing and countered the ethical principles it upholds.
The main idea against torture is grounded in the protection of human rights and upholding constitutional principles. Instances such as the indefinite detention and inhumane treatment of suspects at Guantanamo Bay and the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison highlight the challenges faced during the war on terror. The ethical and legal disputes center on balancing national security concerns with individual rights, with critics arguing that such practices not only violate international law and the U.S. Constitution but also harm America's reputation globally and may inadvertently aid terrorist recruitment.
#SPJ3
B. the disappearing honeybee
C. why steroids should be banned for professional athletes
D. the growth of online learning in public schools
An argumentative research paper usually involves two sides and you are advocating for one side by using evidence. The answer choice C would most fit this description.
Please mark me as brainliest if it helped!
Answer:
C. Why steroids should be banned for professional athletes.
Explanation:
C is the only topic trying to convince rather than inform.