What did the mccarthyism pattern reveal about the nature of American anxiety in 1950

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

The fact that McCarthyism was so widespread and powerful tells us that American anxiety was extremely strong back then. After the World War II, the U.S. were victorious, but so were the Soviets. So, the two great economic and political powers opposed each other from the ideological point of view: communist vs. capitalist propaganda took place. McCarthyism didn't just try to protect the American way of life and capitalist ideology. It ascertained that everyone who wasn't for it was in fact against it, thereby declaring enemies everywhere, instilling fear and paranoia into every citizen. In the course of establishing the cultural notion of "American dream", the red anti-capitalist discourse (which had already been present in popular culture) was unwelcome and had to be banished.

hope this helped,brainliest?

Related Questions

Please help ill mark brainlist the measures in the list below are examples of ways southern states weakened the effects of the- - poll taxes - literacy tests - Grandfather Clauses A ) Compromise of 1850 B ) Fifteenth Amendment C ) Treaty of Guadalupe HidalgoD ) Dred Scott v. Sanford Decision
What is the most likely reason why Southern colonies had such different exports from those of New England? New England colonists were not able to farm. The colonies had different growing seasons. New England colonies had limited access to waterways. Southern colonies did not have a plantation system.
according to the lesson what two events helped to redefine the social qnd economic characteristics of america during the latter half of the ninetennth century
The European Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries relied on colonies for: Group of answer choices raw materials, cheap labor, and markets in the colonial territories. competition to drive innovation. cheaply produced goods manufactured in the colonies. cheap immigrant labor to work in European factories.
What year was the Transatlantic slave trade?

6. Puritans, Huguenots, and Presbyterians all considered to be?Orthodox
Jewish
Catholic
O
Protestant

Answers

Catholic hope u do great sorry if I’m wrong

During World War I, the second phase in battles that crossed enemy lines and approached trenches was heavy bombardment. sniper fire. aerial bombing. infantry attack.

Answers

During World War I, the second phase in battles that crossed enemy lines and approached trenches was an infantry attack. The correct option is (D).

What do you understand by the infantry attack?

Infantry tactics referred to a set of military ideas and techniques pre-owned by infantry to attain tactical goals during battle.

The infantry's duty on the battlefield is usually to close with and combat the adversary, as well as to secure geographic goals; infantry tactics are the means by which this is accomplished.

The infantry's duty in battle is to capture or destroy adversary ground troops and repel enemy assaults. Members of the infantry are ground troops that fight with the adversary in close-range conflict.

Therefore, during World War I, the second phase in battles that crossed enemy lines and approached trenches was an infantry attack.

To know more about the infantry attack, visit:

brainly.com/question/438538

#SPJ7

Answer:It was an infantry attack

Explanation:

Recently there has been discussion in the news about taxing junk food (soft drinks, for example) in an effort to reduce the incidence of obesity in the U.S. Do you think the demand for junk food is elastic or inelastic with respect to price?Based on your knowledge of the price elasticity of demand, do you think the deadweight loss of a soda/junk-food tax would be relatively large or relatively small? Why? Do you think taxing junk food would be a good idea? Based on your analysis, would it really help reduce the number of obese people in the United States? Explain please give me details.

Answers

Answer:

Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.

Explanation:

Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.

Final answer:

The demand for junk food is typically inelastic, meaning a small price increase from a tax wouldn't significantly reduce demand. The deadweight loss would be relatively small. A junk food tax could potentially promote healthier choices, but it's not guaranteed to lower obesity levels alone.

Explanation:

The demand for junk food is generally seen as inelastic because these are often low-cost pleasure products that many consumers are willing to purchase even with a slight increase in price. The price elasticity of demand refers to how sensitive the quantity demanded of a good is to a change in its price. In the case of junk food, a small price increase may not significantly reduce demand.

The deadweight loss refers to the inefficient allocation of resources, in this case resulting from the imposition of a tax. For an inelastic demand good like junk food, the deadweight loss would be relatively small because the quantity demanded does not decrease significantly with an increase in price. However, the impact on obesity rates is not clear cut since it also depends on people's dietary choices and lifestyle habits.

Implementing a junk food tax could be a good measure in incentivizing healthier choices, but it's not the only solution. The overall effect would also heavily depend on supplementary measures, like education on healthy eating and promotion of physical activity. Therefore, simply taxing junk food might not significantly reduce the number of obese people in the United States.

Learn more about Junk Food Tax and Obesity here:

brainly.com/question/35137577

#SPJ3

Which of the following words has both a prefix and a suffix?A. Uniform
B. Unprofessional
C. Joyful
D. Smoothness

Answers

Among all the given words, that has both a prefix and a suffix is unprofessional. Hence, Option B is correct.

What is the meaning of the prefix?

An affix that comes before a word's stem is called a prefix. It creates a new word when it is added to the beginning of another word. For instance, adding the prefix un- to the word joyful results in the word unhappy.

Because it modifies the form of the words it is attached to, a prefix is also known as a preformative, especially in the study of languages.

Prefixes, like other affixes, can be either derivational or inflectional. Derivational prefixes create new words with new semantic meanings and occasionally new lexical categories while maintaining the original word's basic meaning and lexical category.

Therefore, Option D is correct.

Learn more about prefix from here:

brainly.com/question/14161952

#SPJ6

Answer:

Explanation:

How did a religious tolerance across the muslim empires help increase interconnectedness in afro eurasia?????