How were women seen in Puritan society?as equal to men and responsible for preaching


as closer to God than men and responsible for making community rules


as examples of holiness and encouraged to say what they believed


as less important than men and expected to stay quiet























How were women seen in Puritan society?


as equal to men and responsible for preaching


as closer to God than men and responsible for making community rules


as examples of holiness and encouraged to say what they believed


as less important than men and expected to stay quiet





















How were women seen in Puritan society?


as equal to men and responsible for preaching


as closer to God than men and responsible for making community rules


as examples of holiness and encouraged to say what they believed


as less important than men and expected to stay quiet






















How were women seen in Puritan society?


as equal to men and responsible for preaching


as closer to God than men and responsible for making community rules


as examples of holiness and encouraged to say what they believed


as less important than men and expected to stay quiet






















how were women seen in purtains society

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Explanation:

less then men and expected to stay quiet


Related Questions

I’m which colonies was there a high concentration of Dutch people?
Explain a likely cultural effect of pilgrims on the location shown in image 1
Please Help Asap08.04 MC)Effects of the American Civil War Social Costs. Total Forces: Union, 1,556,678, Confederate, 1,082,119. Death from Wounds, Union, 110,070, Confederate, 94,000. Death from Disease, Union, 249,458, Confederate, 164,000. Wounded, Union, 275,175, Confederate, 100,000. Total Deaths, Union, 359,528, Confederate, 258,000. Total Wounded and Deaths, Union, 634,703, Confederate, 358,000.Look at the graph. What would be an example of a social cost stemming from this data? More deaths means more disease in the population. More deaths means more battles. More deaths means fewer national elections. More deaths means fewer workers.
This colony was Great Britain's first attempt at colonizing the continent. It failed andits inhabitants were never seen thereafter.
Compare and contrast the viewpoints historians have on industrialists of the Gilded Age. Based on your notes and knowledge, explain why one historian is more accurate than the other in their interpretations of the impact of industrialists on society during this time.“They were aggressive men, as were the first feudal barons; sometimes they were lawless; in important crises, nearly all of them tended to act without those established moral principles which fixed more or less the conduct of the common people of the community.... These men were robber barons as were their medieval counterparts, the dominating figures of an aggressive economic age.... Under their hands, the renovation of our economic life proceeded relentlessly; large-scale production replaced the scattered, decentralized mode of production; industrial enterprises became more concentrated, more ‘efficient’ technically, and essentially ‘cooperative,’ where they had been purely individualistic and lamentably wasteful.”Matthew Josephson, historian, 1934“What really lifted the giants above the rest was the ability to envision where the world, or their part of it, was going, and to act on that vision in a creative way.... From the days of Adam Smith, self-interest has been the acknowledged driving force of capitalism; the secret of the market system is that one person’s self-interest can simultaneously serve the interests of others. Buyers and sellers, producers and consumers, investors and entrepreneurs take reciprocal advantage of each other. Success rewards those who can discover or create areas of reciprocity; the larger the area, the greater the success. . . . They were captains of industry; but like officers of volunteer regiments, they held their posts at the sufferance of those they led.”H. W. Brands, historian, 1999

What did individual citizens gain or lose as a result of the great compromise

Answers

The Great Compromise was the deal of how representation for each state in Congress as written in the Constitution worked. Small states such as New Jersey wanted each state to have an equal amount of representatives regardless of their population.

Final answer:

Citizens gained fair state representation through a bicameral congress in the Great Compromise of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. However, it also included the Three-Fifths Compromise, which denied full human rights and representation to enslaved individuals.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise, resulted in two significant outcomes that impacted individual citizens. The primary gain was fair representation. The compromise established a bicameral congress with equal representation in the Senate (favoring smaller states) and proportional representation in the House of Representatives (favoring larger states).

However, there was also a loss entailed - the Three-Fifths Compromise. Enslaved individuals were counted as 'three-fifths' of a person when determining the population for representation and taxation purposes. This rule boosted the representation of slave-holding states, yet disregarded the rights and personhood of the enslaved individuals.

Thus, the Great Compromise allowed for an effective federal government while perpetuating the deep social injustice of slavery. It aimed to promote balance and unity among the states, yet simultaneously entrenched stark inequalities and paved the road for future conflict.

Learn more about Great Compromise here:

brainly.com/question/19958240

#SPJ2

Who was not represented at the Berlin Conference?

Answers

Answer:

Africa

Explanation:

In 1884, fourteen European nations met in Berlin, Germany to make decisions about dividing Africa. And guess who was not invited to the meeting-- the African people. There was no political leader, no delegate, nor ambassador from Africa at the Berlin Conference. It was not even considered.

The largest group of whites in the South _______.owned no slaves
owned between one and nine slaves each
owned between ten and ninety-nine slaves each
owned over one hundred slaves each

Answers

The first one, owned no slaves.

Final answer:

The largest group of whites in the South during the slavery period in the United States did not own any slaves. Slave ownership was not common since slaves were a status symbol and a sign of wealth. Therefore, although there was a portion of whites owning slaves, the majority did not.

Explanation:

The largest group of whites in the South during the period of slavery in the United States owned no slaves. It is important to remember that ownership of slaves was not widespread among all whites in the South. The majority could not afford to own slaves since they were considered a status symbol and wealth indicator. While some whites did own between one and ninety-nine slaves each and a very small minority owned over one hundred slaves each, the prevalent group was non-slave owning whites.

Learn more about Slave ownership in the South here:

brainly.com/question/14206101

#SPJ3

HURRY AND ANSWER!!!!What was one effect of the Diaspora on the Jewish people?

Answers

"The destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, and the inability to get to Jerusalem freely, made animal sacrifice impossible. Animal sacrifice was the main way in which Jews could communicate with God and atone for sin. Without physical sacrifice, other ways had to emerge to draw closer to God, and prayer and deeds of lovingkindness were elevated to be the primary ways to connect to God."

HOPE THIS HELPS!!!! :)

<3333333333

Answer:

its B or D

behdssbhsbvhBVsHUKvgbdshzv

Read the excerpt from Flannery O’Connor’s “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” “My only,” the old woman said, “and she’s the sweetest girl in the world. I wouldn’t give her up for nothing on earth. She’s smart too. She can sweep the floor, cook, wash, feed the chickens, and h o. I wouldn’t give her up for a casket of jewels.” Which best describes the irony of the excerpt? Mrs. Crater asserts that Lucynell can sweep, cook, feed the chickens, and h o. but the girl also is very smart. Mrs. Crater is describing all of her daughter’s strengths to Mr. Shiftlet in the hopes that he will marry Lucynell. Mrs. Crater says she values her daughter more than anything in the world, but then she gives her away for a car. Mrs. Crater claims that she would not give her daughter away for anything, when in fact she gives her away for nothing at all.

Answers

The best answer is Mrs. Crater claims that she would not give her daughter away for anything, when in fact she gives her away for nothing at all.

Explanation

If you talk about the irony of a situation, you mean that it is odd or amusing because it involves a contrast. So when Mr. Crater says "I wouldn’t give her up for nothing on earth", she doesn't mean it because she even pays Mr. Shiftlet to marry her daughter.

The other answers does not demonstrate the true irony of the excerpt:

  1. Mrs. Crater asserts that Lucynell can sweep, cook, feed the chickens, and h o. but the girl also is very smart: This can be considered ironic but it is not the irony of the whole excerpt.
  2. Mrs. Crater is describing all of her daughter’s strengths to Mr. Shiftlet in the hopes that he will marry Lucynell: This is not an irony.
  3. Crater says she values her daughter more than anything in the world, but then she gives her away for a car: This is not true.

Answer:

D.)Mrs. Crater claims that she would not give her daughter away for anything, when in fact she gives her away for nothing at all.

Explanation:

Which of following areas is best known for its export of cash crops, especially bananas and other fruit?A.
the Caribbean
B.
Argentina
C.
Central America
D.
Venezuela

Answers

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

"Central American" or option C is best known for exporting bananas and other fruit which at the time were cash crops. Cash crops are crops that produce a good amount of profit for the farmer who grew it, that's why trading was always being made for different cash crops which they can use to make other products that the buyer can then sell for more money in hopes to make profit.

Hope this helps

Answer:

it C, Central America

Explanation:

The Answer is in Quizlet