Summary4
Choose the best summary for the entire passage
ОА.
In baseball history, one of the most famous games
took place between the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New
York Giants. It was a game to decide which team would
win the National League pennant in 1951. Throughout the
season, both teams had impressive winning records
However, by the end of the season, the two teams had
tied and had to play each other in a deciding three-game
In game 3 of the race for National League pennant, Bobby Thomson hit the winning homerun. That
homerun was called "The Shot Heard 'Round the World" because it led to the New York Giants
victory over the Brooklyn Dodgers
playoff
On October 3, 1951, the Dodgers and the Giants
played game 3. On that day, America witnessed the
homerun that would become known as "The Shot Heard
"Round the World." The homerun was hit by Giants'
Bobby Thomson. It was a three-run drive that would
eventually lead to a Giants' victory over the Dodgers. The
final score was 54
The game was a defining moment for baseball
because it was between rivals from across the town. It
was also an amazingly well played game. Most
importantly, the game determined who would play in the
World Series. The Giants ended up losing the series to
the Yankees Even so, the Giants win over the Dodgers
overshadowed the World Series that year
ОВ. The 1951 baseball game between the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants is one of most
famous games. It's legendary because it was an exciting game and decided which team would go to
the World Series. The Giants win the game with the Bobby Thomson's memorable homerun
Ос. The Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants played in 1951 so that the winner of National
League could be determined. There, Bobby Thomson hit a homerun that won the game for the
Giants. It was a three-run drive that made the score 5-4 in the favor of the New York Giants
OD. The game between the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants helped determine who would
play in the 1951 World Series. The winning team would Have to play the New York Yankees. The
Giants won two out of the three games. It was a very exciting game.

This question is incomplete because the options were not given; here is the complete question:

Which lines from Ovid’s "Pyramus and Thisbe" contain an example of characterization?

A. Ringed by the tall brick walls Semíramis had built—so we are told.

B. If you searched all the East, you'd find no girl with greater charm than Thisbe.

C. The wall their houses shared had one thin crack, which formed when they were built and then was left

D. When first light had banished night's bright star-fires from the sky and sun had left the brine-soaked meadows dry

The answer to this question is B. "If you searched all the East, you'd find no girl with greater charm than Thisbe"

Explanation:

In literature, characterization involves using details to explain the traits of characters, this includes their personality, physical traits, qualities, among others. This literary device can be seen in the excerpt "If you searched all the East, you'd find no girl with greater charm than Thisbe" because, in this, the narrator describes Thisbe, who is one main character of the story. Also, the narrator focuses on one important trait of this character, which is her greater charm that according to the narrator could only be found in Thisbe.

Answer:

The answer is B.

Explanation:

I just did it and got it right.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

"Teenagers" and "Car" are nouns. "Five", "Rode", "In", and "The" are not nouns.

The concluding statement can be seen in the sentence "Therefore, both myths show that their cultures may have valued children."

The other sentences can be related as follows:

1. Raven as a child is an important character because he creates light. - a connection back to the point
2. The Haida myth uses Raven, who takes the shape of a baby - the evidence
3. This shows the Haida myth largely depends on the work of a child. - the analysis of the evidence

What does each of these elements mean?

• A concluding statement represents the conclusion of a subject.
• The connection back to the point highlights the subject addressed in the text.
• Evidence proves the information that has been presented.
• Analysis of the evidence analyzes and interprets the justification of information.

All these elements are important to create a coherent text that encourages the reader to continue it and understand the information presented.

Learn more about textual evidence at the link:

brainly.com/question/375033

#SPJ1

Final answer:

Each sentence in the question pertains to distinct parts of a well-formed analysis: the evidence is 'The Haida myth uses Raven, who takes the shape of a baby', and the analysis of the evidence is 'This shows the Haida myth largely depends on the work of a child', the concluding statement is 'Therefore, both myths show that their cultures may have valued children' and a connection back to the point is 'Raven as a child is an important character because he creates light'.

Explanation:

The sentences can be matched to their purpose in a well-developed analysis as follows:

• This shows the Haida myth largely depends on the work of a child - the analysis of the evidence
• The Haida myth uses Raven, who takes the shape of a baby - the evidence
• Therefore, both myths show that their cultures may have valued children - a concluding statement
• Raven as a child is an important character because he creates light - a connection back to the point

Through the use of these sentences, a clear and structured analytical discussion about the Haida myth and its underlying themes can be articulated.

Learn more about Analysis Structure here:

brainly.com/question/32477593

#SPJ12

Answer: A conflict between the character and an outside force.

Explanation: External conflicts are between the character in question, and an outside antagonist. Examples would be like the character in a fight with another character, or a character being abused by another character. Internal conflicts are conflicts within the character, like if the character was having a panic attack or questioning themselves and/or their morals, values, etc.

Answer:

a struggle occurring within a characters kind

Explanation:

example: character vs society

two people inlove despite the families not getting along

Answer:

C

Explanation:

This is referring to the line where she said a dagger of the mind, which shows us that she’s either hallucinating or truly wished there was a dagger there, or has been hurt so badly mentally or physically that it feels like a dagger is digging into her.

Answer:

The answer is c hope it helps!

Explanation:

Answer:

Add more info on what to do exactly.....

Explanation:!!!

!!!

yx=5x=5x