The temperature at 6 a.m. was −12°F. At 11 a.m. the temperature was 0°F. Which of the following shows the temperature change from 6 a.m. to 11 am?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The temperature change is:  12°F

How to calculate the temperature change?

The temperature change from 6 a.m. to 11 a.m. can be calculated by subtracting the initial temperature from the final temperature.

In this case, the initial temperature at 6 a.m. was -12°F and the final temperature at 11 a.m. was 0°F.

Therefore, the temperature change is 0°F - (-12°F) = 12°F. So, the correct answer is C) 12

Read more about Temperature Change at: brainly.com/question/25677592

#SPJ2

Complete question is:

The temperature at 6 a.m. was −12°F. At 11 a.m. the temperature was 0°F. Which of the following shows the temperature change from 6 a.m. to 11 am?

A −12

B 0

C 12

D 24

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

+12 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

You never showed a picture, but im pretty sure this is correct

I hope this helped, please mark Brainliest, thank you!


Related Questions

What are 567 times 3
=Initial Knowledge CheckSolve for x.- 10= -6+ 2xSimplify your answer as much as possible.x=
A king company requires 20 hours of labor to produce a standard table, and a chair requires 12 hours of labor. The labor available is 565 hours per week. The company can produce at most 35 chairs per week.The goal is to find the region that shows the number of tables and chairs that the company can produce in a week, based on the given restrictions. The first step is to represent the situation with a system of inequalities. Let x be the number of tables and y be the number of chairs.Which system of inequalities best represents this situation?please help and thank you!!
There are 11 students in your class. In how many ways a group of 4 students will beselected to participate in a social campaign such that you will always be included inthe group to lead the event?
Pls help with hw I’m not good at this and I really need answers

Suppose you were exploring the hypothesis that there is a relationship between parents’ and children’s party identification. Would we be correct in inferring that such a relationship also exists in the population? Explain your answer. What is the probability that any relationship we found is due to pure chance?

Answers

Answer:

No

It could be purely due to chance.

Step-by-step explanation:

A population is defined as the whole group which has the same characteristics. For example a population of the college belongs to the same college . But a sample may be an element of a population.

So it is not necessary for a population to have the same characteristics as the sample.

But it is essential for the sample to have at least one same characteristics as the population.

So we would not be correct in inferring that such a relationship also exists in the population.

It is a hypothesis which can be true or false due to certain conditions or limitations as the case maybe.

For example in a population of smokers some may be in the habit of taking cocaine. But a sample of cocaine users does not mean the whole population uses it.

It could be purely due to chance if we find out that there is a relationship between parents’ and children’s party identification in the population.

The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical​ trial, results could be analyzed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of pgreater than​0.5,which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a​ girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than 0.5. If you have an interest in establishing the success of the​ method, which of the following​ P-values would you​ prefer: 0.999,​ 0.5, 0.95,​ 0.05, 0.01,​ 0.001? Why?

Answers

Answer:

0.001

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, the aim is to support the null hypothesis, Ha. Where Ha: p > 0.5. Which means we are to reject null hypothesis H0. Where H0: p = 0.5.

The higher the pvalue, the higher the evidence of success. We know If the pvalue is less than level of significance, the null hypothesis H0 is rejected.

Hence the smallest possible value 0.001 is preferred as the pvalue because it corresponds to the sample evidence that most strongly supports the alternative hypothesis that the method is effective

HELP ME PLEASE IF YOU DO YOU WILL GET BRAINLESS AND PLEASE EXPLAIN THE BEST YOU CAN

Answers

Answer:

<3=75°

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle 3 and angle 2x+95 are supplementary( supplementary angles add up to 180°)

So <3+2x+95=180

<3+2x=180-95

<3+2x=85( let's call this equation 1)

Next, angle 5 and angle 8x+71 are opposite angles (opposite angles are equal) therefore <5=8x+71

Now, <3 and <5 are co-interior angles(co-interior angles are supplementary)

So <3+8x+71=180

<3+8x=180-71=109

Thus, <3+8x=109(let's call this equation 2)

Now solving equation 1 and 2 simultaneously:

Make <3 the subject of equation 1

<3=85-2x

Put <3=85-2x into equation 2

85-2x+8x=109

6x=24

x=24/6=4

Now, remember that angle 2x+95 becomes

2(4)+95

8+95=103°

Therefore<3=180-105=75°

How do you graph this helppp and explain

Answers

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  bottom graph shown

Step-by-step explanation:

It can be helpful to rearrange the equation to either of the equivalent forms ...

  f(x) = |3(x -2)|

or ...

  f(x) = 3|x -2|

_____

The first of these forms represents a horizontal compression of the absolute value function by a factor of 3, then a right-shift by 2 units. This matches the bottom graph shown.

__

The second of these forms represents a horizontal right-shift by 2 units, and a vertical expansion by a factor of 3. This matches the bottom graph shown.

__

The attached graph shows the function given here along with the absolute value parent function.

_____

Additional comment

The transformations we're usually interested in are ...

g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . vertically scaled (stretched) by a factor of k

g(x) = f(kx) . . . . .horizontally compressed by a factor of k

g(x) = f(x) +k . . . shifted up by k units

g(x) = f(x -k) . . . . shifted right by k units

In many cases, as here, horizontal scaling and vertical scaling are indistinguishable as to which caused a given effect.

Answer:

bottom graph

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = |3q-6|

because you have absolute value there are 2 possibilities

y= +(3q-6) and y= -(3q-6)

to find where the graph intersects the x-axis make y=0 because there the y coordinate is 0, so we have...

3q-6 =0 and -3q+6 =0

3q= 6 and -3q =-6

q=2 and q=2

the bottom graph has the intersection with x-axis only at 2, so is the correct one

WILL GIVE MEDAL AND FAN! you invest $5,175.00 in a stock plan. it increases 9% the first year and then loses 5% of it's value the second year. what is your gain compared to your original investment?

Answers

Answer:

$183.7125

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Original investment, A = $ 5,175.00

In first year,

Thetotal investment = $ 5,175.00

The amount is increased by 9 %,

Thus, the final amount at the end of first year,

A_1=5,175(1+(9)/(100))^1

=5175(1+0.09)

=5175(1.09)

=\$ 5640.75

In Second year,

The total investment = $ 5640.75,

The amount is decreased by 5 %,

Thus, the final amount at the end of second year,

A_2=5640.75(1-(5)/(100))^1

=5640.75(1-0.05)

=5640.75(0.95)

=\$ 5358.7125

Hence,

\text{Total Gain}=A_2-A

=5358.7125-5175

=\$183.7125

5,175 + 9% = 5640.75

5640.75 - 5% = 5302.305

Original investment = 5,175
Gain                          = 5,302.305

Subtract them both and get = 127.305

DOES ANYONE PLEASE KNOW? ANSWER IF YOU KNOW PLEASE

Answers

Answer:

The first equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

m = -12.50, b = 1,500; The first option.

Step-by-step explanation:

To figure out the slope I used the equation, y1 - y2 / x1 - x2, to get the answer -12.50.

For the y-intercept ( b ), I just looked at the data table and where there was a zero in the X side of the Y there would be the, b, or y-intercept.