What is the length of AC?
What is the length of AC? - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The length of AC found using the Pythagorean Theorem is C) 120.

The length of AC can be found using the Pythagorean Theorem. The Pythagorean Theorem states that in a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. In this case, the hypotenuse is AC, and the other two sides are AB and BC.

AB = 60 units

BC = 80 units

Plugging these values into the Pythagorean Theorem, we get:

AC^2 = AB^2 + BC^2

AC^2 = 60^2 + 80^2

AC^2 = 3600 + 6400

AC^2 = 10000

AC = \sqrt{(10000)

AC = 100 * \sqrt{(10)

AC = 120 units

Therefore, the length of AC is C) 120.

To learn more about length here:

brainly.com/question/32060888

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer: B I think and I hope it’s right!

Related Questions

Please help me thank you so much. Just not sure of my answers
A regular octagon dividesinto how many triangles (drawn from a point in the center of the octagon)?
Ingredients •1 1/2cups all-purpose flour.• 31/2 teaspoons baking powder.• 1 teaspoon salt.1 tablespoon white sugar.• 1 1/4 cups milk.• 1 egg.• 3 tablespoons butter.1.) How much of each of the ingredients do you need to make 16 pancakes, 4 pancakes, 12pancakes? Explain which operations with fractions you used to obtain your answer.
Find the exact values of the six trigonometric functions of given the point (-4, 5) on the terminal side of in standard position.
Hattie is making fruit baskets, which includes apples and bananas, to send to some of her real estate clients. She wants each basket to have 12 pieces of fruit, but the fruit should weigh no more than 80 ounces total. On average, each apple weighs 5 ounces, and each banana weighs 7 ounces.

How do you graph this helppp and explain

Answers

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  bottom graph shown

Step-by-step explanation:

It can be helpful to rearrange the equation to either of the equivalent forms ...

  f(x) = |3(x -2)|

or ...

  f(x) = 3|x -2|

_____

The first of these forms represents a horizontal compression of the absolute value function by a factor of 3, then a right-shift by 2 units. This matches the bottom graph shown.

__

The second of these forms represents a horizontal right-shift by 2 units, and a vertical expansion by a factor of 3. This matches the bottom graph shown.

__

The attached graph shows the function given here along with the absolute value parent function.

_____

Additional comment

The transformations we're usually interested in are ...

g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . vertically scaled (stretched) by a factor of k

g(x) = f(kx) . . . . .horizontally compressed by a factor of k

g(x) = f(x) +k . . . shifted up by k units

g(x) = f(x -k) . . . . shifted right by k units

In many cases, as here, horizontal scaling and vertical scaling are indistinguishable as to which caused a given effect.

Answer:

bottom graph

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = |3q-6|

because you have absolute value there are 2 possibilities

y= +(3q-6) and y= -(3q-6)

to find where the graph intersects the x-axis make y=0 because there the y coordinate is 0, so we have...

3q-6 =0 and -3q+6 =0

3q= 6 and -3q =-6

q=2 and q=2

the bottom graph has the intersection with x-axis only at 2, so is the correct one

Please help me answer this In a game of chance, Scott can win in two different ways. One way is by rolling either a 1 or a 3 with a standard die. The second way is to land on a 4, 5, or 7 on the spinner with eight equally likely sections numbered from one to eight. Scott thinks he has a better chance with the spinner because he has three numbers that will win instead of only two. Is he correct? What is the probability of winning with the die? What is the probability of winning with the spinner? Which should he choose? Thank you if you are answering this is very hard

Answers

He is correct.The probability of winning with the die is while the probability of winning with the spinner is which is 0.375, slightly bigger than rolling the die!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

By 12 the ansewr is 1000%

Find the new amount if $65 increase 20/

Answers

Answer:

$85

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the new amount would be $85

Step-by-step explanation:

you do $65 and add 20 because it increased 20

can you please mark me brainlest I would mean a lot

Please help me with my math!!!!!!!!!

Answers

12.8 km per hour

51.2 km in 4 hours

Find the product of 2 5/6 and 3

Answers

Answer:

8.5 or 8 1/2.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the product of 2 5/6 and 3, you can multiply the two numbers together.

2 5/6 x 3 is equal to 8.5, therefore, the product of these two numbers is 8 1/2.

Heavy children: Are children heavier now than they were in the past? The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) taken between 1999 and 2002 reported that the mean weight of six-year-old girls in the United States was 49.3 pounds. Another NHANES survey, published in 2008, reported that a sample of 190 six-year-old girls weighed between 2003 and 2006 had an average weight of 46 pounds. Assume the population standard deviation is =σ17 pounds. Can you conclude that the mean weight of six-year-old girls in 2006 is different from what it was in 2002? Use the =α0.10 level of significance and the critical value method.

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

You have two surveys that measure the weight of six-year-old girls in the USA,

1) 1999-2002

μ= 49.3 pounds

(I'll take this mean as the population value since it can be considered "historical data" or point of comparison to make the test.)

2)2003-2006

sample n= 190

sample mean x[bar]= 46 pounds

population standard deviation σ= 17 pounds

Assuming that the study variable X" Weight of six-year-old girls between 2003 - 2006" (pound) has a normal distribution.

If you need to test that the children are heavier now (2003-2006) than in the past (1999-2002) the test hypothesis is:

H₀: μ ≤ 49.3

H₁: μ > 49.3

α: 0.10

The statistic is Z= (x[bar]-μ)   ~N(0;1)

                                (δ/√n)

The critical region is one-tailed to the right.

Z_(1-\alpha ) = Z_(0.90) = 1.28

So you'll reject the null hypothesis if the calculated statistic is equal or greater than 1.28.

Z=  46 - 49.3 = -2.67

     17/√190

Since the calculated value -2.67 is less than 1.28 you do not reject the null hypothesis. In other words, the six-year-old girls from 2003-2006 are thinner than the girls from 1999-2002.

I hope it helps!